Loading…
Measuring user interactions with websites: A comparison of two industry standard analytics approaches using data of 86 websites
This research compares four standard analytics metrics from Google Analytics with SimilarWeb using one year's average monthly data for 86 websites from 26 countries and 19 industry verticals. The results show statistically significant differences between the two services for total visits, uniqu...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268212-e0268212 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23 |
container_end_page | e0268212 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0268212 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Jansen, Bernard J Jung, Soon-Gyo Salminen, Joni |
description | This research compares four standard analytics metrics from Google Analytics with SimilarWeb using one year's average monthly data for 86 websites from 26 countries and 19 industry verticals. The results show statistically significant differences between the two services for total visits, unique visitors, bounce rates, and average session duration. Using Google Analytics as the baseline, SimilarWeb average values were 19.4% lower for total visits, 38.7% lower for unique visitors, 25.2% higher for bounce rate, and 56.2% higher for session duration. The website rankings between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics for all metrics are significantly correlated, especially for total visits and unique visitors. The accuracy/inaccuracy of the metrics from both services is discussed from the vantage of the data collection methods employed. In the absence of a gold standard, combining the two services is a reasonable approach, with Google Analytics for onsite and SimilarWeb for network metrics. Finally, the differences between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics measures are systematic, so with Google Analytics metrics from a known site, one can reasonably generate the Google Analytics metrics for related sites based on the SimilarWeb values. The implications are that SimilarWeb provides conservative analytics in terms of visits and visitors relative to those of Google Analytics, and both tools can be utilized in a complementary fashion in situations where site analytics is not available for competitive intelligence and benchmarking analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0268212 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2687677820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A705119007</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d12ed9f4bb2147f38a95857afabe467c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A705119007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpfCP0AQCQnBocVfcRIOSNWKj0qLVuLrak1sp_UqjYPtUHrir-Nss1WD9oBycGQ_887Ma0-SPMVogWmO31zb3rXQLDrb6gUivCCY3EvOcUnJnBNE75_8nyWPvL9GKKMF5w-TM5pxQoqsOE_-fNbge2faddp77VLTBu1ABmNbn-5M2KQ7XXkTtH-bLlNptx04422b2joNOxt51fvg9qkP0CpwKoVY1D4Y6VPoOmdBbrSP2kMGBQGGwIIfVR8nD2povH4yrrPk-4f33y4-zS-vPq4ulpdzyUsS5oznVcmLEqFal7zkjHJVS6QUQzWwrKZKYsmQZEwqWiFVME6p4kgipnRZETpLnh90u8Z6MXrnRbQt53leRI9myepAKAvXonNmC24vLBhxs2HdWoCLfTVaKEy0KmtWVQSzvKYFlFmR5VBDpWOlMmq9G7P11VYrqdvgoJmITk9asxFr-0uUmCFS5FHg1Sjg7M9e-yC2xkvdNNBq2w9155jwjPOh7hf_oHd3N1JriA2YtrYxrxxExTJHGcbR2iHt4g4qfkpvjYwPrTZxfxLwehIQmaB_hzX03ovV1y__z179mLIvT9iNhiZsvG36m3c5BdkBlM5673R9NBkjMczJrRtimBMxzkkMe3Z6Qceg28GgfwFP9w9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2687677820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring user interactions with websites: A comparison of two industry standard analytics approaches using data of 86 websites</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jansen, Bernard J ; Jung, Soon-Gyo ; Salminen, Joni</creator><contributor>Suleman, Hussein</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bernard J ; Jung, Soon-Gyo ; Salminen, Joni ; Suleman, Hussein</creatorcontrib><description>This research compares four standard analytics metrics from Google Analytics with SimilarWeb using one year's average monthly data for 86 websites from 26 countries and 19 industry verticals. The results show statistically significant differences between the two services for total visits, unique visitors, bounce rates, and average session duration. Using Google Analytics as the baseline, SimilarWeb average values were 19.4% lower for total visits, 38.7% lower for unique visitors, 25.2% higher for bounce rate, and 56.2% higher for session duration. The website rankings between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics for all metrics are significantly correlated, especially for total visits and unique visitors. The accuracy/inaccuracy of the metrics from both services is discussed from the vantage of the data collection methods employed. In the absence of a gold standard, combining the two services is a reasonable approach, with Google Analytics for onsite and SimilarWeb for network metrics. Finally, the differences between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics measures are systematic, so with Google Analytics metrics from a known site, one can reasonably generate the Google Analytics metrics for related sites based on the SimilarWeb values. The implications are that SimilarWeb provides conservative analytics in terms of visits and visitors relative to those of Google Analytics, and both tools can be utilized in a complementary fashion in situations where site analytics is not available for competitive intelligence and benchmarking analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35622858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Business intelligence ; Competition ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Data collection ; Data entry ; Digital marketing ; Engineering and Technology ; Industry standards ; Intelligence ; Intelligence (information) ; Internet service providers ; Mathematical analysis ; Media planning & buying ; Methods ; Normal distribution ; Online advertising ; Physical Sciences ; Research methodology ; Social aspects ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; User generated content ; Web analytics ; Web browsers ; Web sites ; Websites</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268212-e0268212</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Jansen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Jansen et al 2022 Jansen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6468-6609</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2687677820/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2687677820?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35622858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Suleman, Hussein</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bernard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Soon-Gyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salminen, Joni</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring user interactions with websites: A comparison of two industry standard analytics approaches using data of 86 websites</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This research compares four standard analytics metrics from Google Analytics with SimilarWeb using one year's average monthly data for 86 websites from 26 countries and 19 industry verticals. The results show statistically significant differences between the two services for total visits, unique visitors, bounce rates, and average session duration. Using Google Analytics as the baseline, SimilarWeb average values were 19.4% lower for total visits, 38.7% lower for unique visitors, 25.2% higher for bounce rate, and 56.2% higher for session duration. The website rankings between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics for all metrics are significantly correlated, especially for total visits and unique visitors. The accuracy/inaccuracy of the metrics from both services is discussed from the vantage of the data collection methods employed. In the absence of a gold standard, combining the two services is a reasonable approach, with Google Analytics for onsite and SimilarWeb for network metrics. Finally, the differences between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics measures are systematic, so with Google Analytics metrics from a known site, one can reasonably generate the Google Analytics metrics for related sites based on the SimilarWeb values. The implications are that SimilarWeb provides conservative analytics in terms of visits and visitors relative to those of Google Analytics, and both tools can be utilized in a complementary fashion in situations where site analytics is not available for competitive intelligence and benchmarking analysis.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Business intelligence</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data entry</subject><subject>Digital marketing</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Industry standards</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence (information)</subject><subject>Internet service providers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Media planning & buying</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Online advertising</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>User generated content</subject><subject>Web analytics</subject><subject>Web browsers</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpfCP0AQCQnBocVfcRIOSNWKj0qLVuLrak1sp_UqjYPtUHrir-Nss1WD9oBycGQ_887Ma0-SPMVogWmO31zb3rXQLDrb6gUivCCY3EvOcUnJnBNE75_8nyWPvL9GKKMF5w-TM5pxQoqsOE_-fNbge2faddp77VLTBu1ABmNbn-5M2KQ7XXkTtH-bLlNptx04422b2joNOxt51fvg9qkP0CpwKoVY1D4Y6VPoOmdBbrSP2kMGBQGGwIIfVR8nD2povH4yrrPk-4f33y4-zS-vPq4ulpdzyUsS5oznVcmLEqFal7zkjHJVS6QUQzWwrKZKYsmQZEwqWiFVME6p4kgipnRZETpLnh90u8Z6MXrnRbQt53leRI9myepAKAvXonNmC24vLBhxs2HdWoCLfTVaKEy0KmtWVQSzvKYFlFmR5VBDpWOlMmq9G7P11VYrqdvgoJmITk9asxFr-0uUmCFS5FHg1Sjg7M9e-yC2xkvdNNBq2w9155jwjPOh7hf_oHd3N1JriA2YtrYxrxxExTJHGcbR2iHt4g4qfkpvjYwPrTZxfxLwehIQmaB_hzX03ovV1y__z179mLIvT9iNhiZsvG36m3c5BdkBlM5673R9NBkjMczJrRtimBMxzkkMe3Z6Qceg28GgfwFP9w9Q</recordid><startdate>20220527</startdate><enddate>20220527</enddate><creator>Jansen, Bernard J</creator><creator>Jung, Soon-Gyo</creator><creator>Salminen, Joni</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-6609</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220527</creationdate><title>Measuring user interactions with websites: A comparison of two industry standard analytics approaches using data of 86 websites</title><author>Jansen, Bernard J ; Jung, Soon-Gyo ; Salminen, Joni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Business intelligence</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data entry</topic><topic>Digital marketing</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Industry standards</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence (information)</topic><topic>Internet service providers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Media planning & buying</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Online advertising</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>User generated content</topic><topic>Web analytics</topic><topic>Web browsers</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bernard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Soon-Gyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salminen, Joni</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, Bernard J</au><au>Jung, Soon-Gyo</au><au>Salminen, Joni</au><au>Suleman, Hussein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring user interactions with websites: A comparison of two industry standard analytics approaches using data of 86 websites</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-05-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0268212</spage><epage>e0268212</epage><pages>e0268212-e0268212</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This research compares four standard analytics metrics from Google Analytics with SimilarWeb using one year's average monthly data for 86 websites from 26 countries and 19 industry verticals. The results show statistically significant differences between the two services for total visits, unique visitors, bounce rates, and average session duration. Using Google Analytics as the baseline, SimilarWeb average values were 19.4% lower for total visits, 38.7% lower for unique visitors, 25.2% higher for bounce rate, and 56.2% higher for session duration. The website rankings between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics for all metrics are significantly correlated, especially for total visits and unique visitors. The accuracy/inaccuracy of the metrics from both services is discussed from the vantage of the data collection methods employed. In the absence of a gold standard, combining the two services is a reasonable approach, with Google Analytics for onsite and SimilarWeb for network metrics. Finally, the differences between SimilarWeb and Google Analytics measures are systematic, so with Google Analytics metrics from a known site, one can reasonably generate the Google Analytics metrics for related sites based on the SimilarWeb values. The implications are that SimilarWeb provides conservative analytics in terms of visits and visitors relative to those of Google Analytics, and both tools can be utilized in a complementary fashion in situations where site analytics is not available for competitive intelligence and benchmarking analysis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35622858</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0268212</doi><tpages>e0268212</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-6609</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268212-e0268212 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2687677820 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Business intelligence Competition Computer and Information Sciences Data collection Data entry Digital marketing Engineering and Technology Industry standards Intelligence Intelligence (information) Internet service providers Mathematical analysis Media planning & buying Methods Normal distribution Online advertising Physical Sciences Research methodology Social aspects Social networks Social Sciences Statistical analysis User generated content Web analytics Web browsers Web sites Websites |
title | Measuring user interactions with websites: A comparison of two industry standard analytics approaches using data of 86 websites |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A40%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20user%20interactions%20with%20websites:%20A%20comparison%20of%20two%20industry%20standard%20analytics%20approaches%20using%20data%20of%2086%20websites&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Jansen,%20Bernard%20J&rft.date=2022-05-27&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0268212&rft.epage=e0268212&rft.pages=e0268212-e0268212&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0268212&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA705119007%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-467b968900fe9696436dfc0dd40fa45f3dc1c40c44cd3b0d84633d60c04de9b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2687677820&rft_id=info:pmid/35622858&rft_galeid=A705119007&rfr_iscdi=true |