Loading…
Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia (E.) coli have been widely described as the cause of treatment failures in humans around the world. The origin of human infections with these microorganisms is discussed controversially and in most cases hard to identify. Since they pose...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271317 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0271317 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Perestrelo, Sara Correia Carreira, Guido Valentin, Lars Fischer, Jennie Pfeifer, Yvonne Werner, Guido Schmiedel, Judith Falgenhauer, Linda Imirzalioglu, Can Chakraborty, Trinad Käsbohrer, Annemarie |
description | Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia (E.) coli have been widely described as the cause of treatment failures in humans around the world. The origin of human infections with these microorganisms is discussed controversially and in most cases hard to identify. Since they pose a relevant risk to human health, it becomes crucial to understand their sources and the transmission pathways. In this study, we analyzed data from different studies in Germany and grouped ESBL-producing E. coli from different sources and human cases into subtypes based on their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics (ESBL-genotype, E. coli phylogenetic group and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance pattern). Then, a source attribution model was developed in order to attribute the human cases to the considered sources. The sources were from different animal species (cattle, pig, chicken, dog and horse) and also from patients with nosocomial infections. The human isolates were gathered from community cases which showed to be colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli. We used the attribution model first with only the animal sources (Approach A) and then additionally with the nosocomial infections (Approach B). We observed that all sources contributed to the human cases, nevertheless, isolates from nosocomial infections were more related to those from human cases than any of the other sources. We identified subtypes that were only detected in the considered animal species and others that were observed only in the human population. Some subtypes from the human cases could not be allocated to any of the sources from this study and were attributed to an unknown source. Our study emphasizes the importance of human-to-human transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli and the different role that pets, livestock and healthcare facilities may play in the transmission of these resistant bacteria. The developed source attribution model can be further used to monitor future trends. A One Health approach is necessary to develop source attribution models further to integrate also wildlife, environmental as well as food sources in addition to human and animal data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0271317 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2690165498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710322297</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9ef9ceb995b2465b8790de1b941f54e9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A710322297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1GL1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgujDrk3SpMmLcC7rubBw4KlvEtJkupulbWrSivftze72jq3cg-QhYfKb_2QmM0nyEmVzRAr0YecG36p63rkW5hkuEEHFo-QcCYJnDGfk8cn5LHkWwi7LKOGMPU3OCOVEYEbPk58L13TK2-Da1FWp6jrvlN5CSCvn0xBjaEhV33tbDr09QsubT-tZ5MygbbtJlyHy3uqtVal2tU1tm16Bb1R7-zx5Uqk6wItxv0i-f15-W3yZra-vVovL9UwzgfsZcMqYoUAJ4JIQMIxVGWECDBaGaqWoyAXGJOdMsUIZUEWeG8O45pzxnJGL5PVRt6tdkGNlgsRMZIjRXPBIrI6EcWonO28b5W-lU1YeDM5vpPK91TVIAZXQUApBS5wzWvJCZAZQKXJU0RxE1Po4RhvKBoyGtveqnohOb1q7lRv3WwrMGeY0CrwbBbz7NUDoZWODhrpWLbjh8G6UxdB4n9mbf9CHsxupjYoJ2LZyMa7ei8rLAmUEYyyKSM0foOIy0Fgd26iy0T5xeD9xiEwPf_qNGkKQq5uv_89e_5iyb0_YLai63wZXHxosTMH8CGrvQvBQ3RcZZXI_BXfVkPspkOMURLdXpx9073TX9uQv9uABlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2690165498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Perestrelo, Sara ; Correia Carreira, Guido ; Valentin, Lars ; Fischer, Jennie ; Pfeifer, Yvonne ; Werner, Guido ; Schmiedel, Judith ; Falgenhauer, Linda ; Imirzalioglu, Can ; Chakraborty, Trinad ; Käsbohrer, Annemarie</creator><contributor>Kluytmans, Jan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perestrelo, Sara ; Correia Carreira, Guido ; Valentin, Lars ; Fischer, Jennie ; Pfeifer, Yvonne ; Werner, Guido ; Schmiedel, Judith ; Falgenhauer, Linda ; Imirzalioglu, Can ; Chakraborty, Trinad ; Käsbohrer, Annemarie ; Kluytmans, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia (E.) coli have been widely described as the cause of treatment failures in humans around the world. The origin of human infections with these microorganisms is discussed controversially and in most cases hard to identify. Since they pose a relevant risk to human health, it becomes crucial to understand their sources and the transmission pathways. In this study, we analyzed data from different studies in Germany and grouped ESBL-producing E. coli from different sources and human cases into subtypes based on their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics (ESBL-genotype, E. coli phylogenetic group and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance pattern). Then, a source attribution model was developed in order to attribute the human cases to the considered sources. The sources were from different animal species (cattle, pig, chicken, dog and horse) and also from patients with nosocomial infections. The human isolates were gathered from community cases which showed to be colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli. We used the attribution model first with only the animal sources (Approach A) and then additionally with the nosocomial infections (Approach B). We observed that all sources contributed to the human cases, nevertheless, isolates from nosocomial infections were more related to those from human cases than any of the other sources. We identified subtypes that were only detected in the considered animal species and others that were observed only in the human population. Some subtypes from the human cases could not be allocated to any of the sources from this study and were attributed to an unknown source. Our study emphasizes the importance of human-to-human transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli and the different role that pets, livestock and healthcare facilities may play in the transmission of these resistant bacteria. The developed source attribution model can be further used to monitor future trends. A One Health approach is necessary to develop source attribution models further to integrate also wildlife, environmental as well as food sources in addition to human and animal data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35839265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal species ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Bacteria ; Beef cattle ; Beta lactamases ; beta-Lactamases - metabolism ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Consortia ; Cross Infection ; Dogs ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Farms ; Food sources ; Genotypes ; Germany - epidemiology ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health care facilities ; Health risks ; Hogs ; Horses ; Hospitals ; Human populations ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Livestock ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microorganisms ; Modelling ; Nosocomial infection ; Nosocomial infections ; Pets ; Phylogeny ; Plasmids ; Salmonella ; Swine ; Wildlife ; β Lactamase</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271317</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Perestrelo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Perestrelo et al 2022 Perestrelo et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8370-7911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2690165498/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2690165498?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35839265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kluytmans, Jan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perestrelo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia Carreira, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiedel, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falgenhauer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imirzalioglu, Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Trinad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Käsbohrer, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia (E.) coli have been widely described as the cause of treatment failures in humans around the world. The origin of human infections with these microorganisms is discussed controversially and in most cases hard to identify. Since they pose a relevant risk to human health, it becomes crucial to understand their sources and the transmission pathways. In this study, we analyzed data from different studies in Germany and grouped ESBL-producing E. coli from different sources and human cases into subtypes based on their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics (ESBL-genotype, E. coli phylogenetic group and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance pattern). Then, a source attribution model was developed in order to attribute the human cases to the considered sources. The sources were from different animal species (cattle, pig, chicken, dog and horse) and also from patients with nosocomial infections. The human isolates were gathered from community cases which showed to be colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli. We used the attribution model first with only the animal sources (Approach A) and then additionally with the nosocomial infections (Approach B). We observed that all sources contributed to the human cases, nevertheless, isolates from nosocomial infections were more related to those from human cases than any of the other sources. We identified subtypes that were only detected in the considered animal species and others that were observed only in the human population. Some subtypes from the human cases could not be allocated to any of the sources from this study and were attributed to an unknown source. Our study emphasizes the importance of human-to-human transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli and the different role that pets, livestock and healthcare facilities may play in the transmission of these resistant bacteria. The developed source attribution model can be further used to monitor future trends. A One Health approach is necessary to develop source attribution models further to integrate also wildlife, environmental as well as food sources in addition to human and animal data.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Beta lactamases</subject><subject>beta-Lactamases - metabolism</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Cross Infection</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nosocomial infection</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>β Lactamase</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1GL1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgujDrk3SpMmLcC7rubBw4KlvEtJkupulbWrSivftze72jq3cg-QhYfKb_2QmM0nyEmVzRAr0YecG36p63rkW5hkuEEHFo-QcCYJnDGfk8cn5LHkWwi7LKOGMPU3OCOVEYEbPk58L13TK2-Da1FWp6jrvlN5CSCvn0xBjaEhV33tbDr09QsubT-tZ5MygbbtJlyHy3uqtVal2tU1tm16Bb1R7-zx5Uqk6wItxv0i-f15-W3yZra-vVovL9UwzgfsZcMqYoUAJ4JIQMIxVGWECDBaGaqWoyAXGJOdMsUIZUEWeG8O45pzxnJGL5PVRt6tdkGNlgsRMZIjRXPBIrI6EcWonO28b5W-lU1YeDM5vpPK91TVIAZXQUApBS5wzWvJCZAZQKXJU0RxE1Po4RhvKBoyGtveqnohOb1q7lRv3WwrMGeY0CrwbBbz7NUDoZWODhrpWLbjh8G6UxdB4n9mbf9CHsxupjYoJ2LZyMa7ei8rLAmUEYyyKSM0foOIy0Fgd26iy0T5xeD9xiEwPf_qNGkKQq5uv_89e_5iyb0_YLai63wZXHxosTMH8CGrvQvBQ3RcZZXI_BXfVkPspkOMURLdXpx9073TX9uQv9uABlg</recordid><startdate>20220715</startdate><enddate>20220715</enddate><creator>Perestrelo, Sara</creator><creator>Correia Carreira, Guido</creator><creator>Valentin, Lars</creator><creator>Fischer, Jennie</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Yvonne</creator><creator>Werner, Guido</creator><creator>Schmiedel, Judith</creator><creator>Falgenhauer, Linda</creator><creator>Imirzalioglu, Can</creator><creator>Chakraborty, Trinad</creator><creator>Käsbohrer, Annemarie</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-7911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220715</creationdate><title>Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany</title><author>Perestrelo, Sara ; Correia Carreira, Guido ; Valentin, Lars ; Fischer, Jennie ; Pfeifer, Yvonne ; Werner, Guido ; Schmiedel, Judith ; Falgenhauer, Linda ; Imirzalioglu, Can ; Chakraborty, Trinad ; Käsbohrer, Annemarie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Beta lactamases</topic><topic>beta-Lactamases - metabolism</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Cross Infection</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nosocomial infection</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>β Lactamase</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perestrelo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia Carreira, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiedel, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falgenhauer, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imirzalioglu, Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Trinad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Käsbohrer, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perestrelo, Sara</au><au>Correia Carreira, Guido</au><au>Valentin, Lars</au><au>Fischer, Jennie</au><au>Pfeifer, Yvonne</au><au>Werner, Guido</au><au>Schmiedel, Judith</au><au>Falgenhauer, Linda</au><au>Imirzalioglu, Can</au><au>Chakraborty, Trinad</au><au>Käsbohrer, Annemarie</au><au>Kluytmans, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-07-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0271317</spage><pages>e0271317-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia (E.) coli have been widely described as the cause of treatment failures in humans around the world. The origin of human infections with these microorganisms is discussed controversially and in most cases hard to identify. Since they pose a relevant risk to human health, it becomes crucial to understand their sources and the transmission pathways. In this study, we analyzed data from different studies in Germany and grouped ESBL-producing E. coli from different sources and human cases into subtypes based on their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics (ESBL-genotype, E. coli phylogenetic group and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance pattern). Then, a source attribution model was developed in order to attribute the human cases to the considered sources. The sources were from different animal species (cattle, pig, chicken, dog and horse) and also from patients with nosocomial infections. The human isolates were gathered from community cases which showed to be colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli. We used the attribution model first with only the animal sources (Approach A) and then additionally with the nosocomial infections (Approach B). We observed that all sources contributed to the human cases, nevertheless, isolates from nosocomial infections were more related to those from human cases than any of the other sources. We identified subtypes that were only detected in the considered animal species and others that were observed only in the human population. Some subtypes from the human cases could not be allocated to any of the sources from this study and were attributed to an unknown source. Our study emphasizes the importance of human-to-human transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli and the different role that pets, livestock and healthcare facilities may play in the transmission of these resistant bacteria. The developed source attribution model can be further used to monitor future trends. A One Health approach is necessary to develop source attribution models further to integrate also wildlife, environmental as well as food sources in addition to human and animal data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35839265</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0271317</doi><tpages>e0271317</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-7911</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271317 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2690165498 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Animal species Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Antimicrobial resistance Bacteria Beef cattle Beta lactamases beta-Lactamases - metabolism Biology and Life Sciences Cattle Consortia Cross Infection Dogs Drug resistance E coli Escherichia coli Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology Farms Food sources Genotypes Germany - epidemiology Health aspects Health care Health care facilities Health risks Hogs Horses Hospitals Human populations Humans Laboratories Livestock Medicine and Health Sciences Microorganisms Modelling Nosocomial infection Nosocomial infections Pets Phylogeny Plasmids Salmonella Swine Wildlife β Lactamase |
title | Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A54%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20approaches%20for%20source%20attribution%20of%20ESBL-producing%20Escherichia%20coli%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Perestrelo,%20Sara&rft.date=2022-07-15&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0271317&rft.pages=e0271317-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0271317&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA710322297%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e8566d5e53e2b33ed66f0369ed29d5caa5949223486a67adea744dd68c8868463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2690165498&rft_id=info:pmid/35839265&rft_galeid=A710322297&rfr_iscdi=true |