Loading…
Mitochondrial DNA barcoding of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand
The correct identification of mosquito species is important for effective mosquito vector control. However, the standard morphological identification of mosquito species based on the available keys is not easy with specimens in the field due to missing or damaged morphological features during mosqui...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0275090-e0275090 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63 |
container_end_page | e0275090 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0275090 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat Changbunjong, Tanasak Laojun, Sedthapong Nutepsu, Teerayoot Suwandittakul, Nantana Kuntawong, Kewarin Sumruayphol, Suchada Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn |
description | The correct identification of mosquito species is important for effective mosquito vector control. However, the standard morphological identification of mosquito species based on the available keys is not easy with specimens in the field due to missing or damaged morphological features during mosquito collections, often leading to the misidentification of morphologically indistinguishable. To resolve this problem, we collected mosquito species across Thailand to gather genetic information, and evaluated the DNA barcoding efficacy for mosquito species identification in Thailand. A total of 310 mosquito samples, representing 73 mosquito species, were amplified using mitochondrial cytochrome
c
oxidase subunit I (
COI
) primers. The average maximum intraspecific genetic variation of the 73 mosquito species was 1% ranged from 0–5.7%. While, average minimum interspecific genetic variation (the distance to the nearest neighbour) of the 73 mosquito species was 7% ranged from 0.3–12.9%. The identification of success rates based on the “Best Match,” “Best Close Match,” and “All Species Barcodes” methods were 97.7%, 91.6%, and 81%, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses of
Anopheles COI
sequences demonstrated a clear separation between almost all species (except for those between
An
.
baimaii
and
An
.
dirus
), with high bootstrap support values (97%–99%). Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses revealed potential sibling species of
An
.
annularis
,
An
.
tessellatus
, and
An
.
subpictus
in Thailand. Our results indicated that DNA barcoding is an effective molecular approach for the accurate identification of mosquitoes in Thailand. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0275090 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2716914087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A719015784</galeid><sourcerecordid>A719015784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkltvFCEUx4mxsbX6DUwk8aU-7MptYMYHk83Wtib18lCfCTCwS8PAFGZM_PaydjTWNDwcAr_zP1cAXmG0xlTgd7dpzlGF9ZiiXSMiGtShJ-AEd5SsOEH06T_3Y_C8lFuEGtpy_gwcU36QwO0J-PbZT8nsU-yzVwGef9lArbJJvY87mBwcUrmbKwLLaI23BZ6d-3GyWb2H2zl443tl30If4c1e-aBi_wIcORWKfbnYU_D94uPN9mp1_fXy03ZzvTKMsmnVtsyhXuuGKtQ4jVRHuSNcGYeZNcYRgZwlVjPeMMy00lh0RiOKrDKaKE5Pwet73TGkIpdmFEkE5h1mqBWV-LAQsx5sb2ycsgpyzH5Q-adMysuHP9Hv5S79kB1nhFJUBc4WgZzuZlsmOfhibKhl2jT_jiV4SxvaVfTNf-jjGS3UTgUrfXSpxjUHUbkRuEO4ES2r1PoRqp7eDt7UaTtf3x84sHsHk1Mp2bq_NWIkD4P-k4w87IpcdoX-AiJpshg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716914087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitochondrial DNA barcoding of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat ; Changbunjong, Tanasak ; Laojun, Sedthapong ; Nutepsu, Teerayoot ; Suwandittakul, Nantana ; Kuntawong, Kewarin ; Sumruayphol, Suchada ; Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn</creator><contributor>Yue, Bi-Song</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat ; Changbunjong, Tanasak ; Laojun, Sedthapong ; Nutepsu, Teerayoot ; Suwandittakul, Nantana ; Kuntawong, Kewarin ; Sumruayphol, Suchada ; Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn ; Yue, Bi-Song</creatorcontrib><description>The correct identification of mosquito species is important for effective mosquito vector control. However, the standard morphological identification of mosquito species based on the available keys is not easy with specimens in the field due to missing or damaged morphological features during mosquito collections, often leading to the misidentification of morphologically indistinguishable. To resolve this problem, we collected mosquito species across Thailand to gather genetic information, and evaluated the DNA barcoding efficacy for mosquito species identification in Thailand. A total of 310 mosquito samples, representing 73 mosquito species, were amplified using mitochondrial cytochrome
c
oxidase subunit I (
COI
) primers. The average maximum intraspecific genetic variation of the 73 mosquito species was 1% ranged from 0–5.7%. While, average minimum interspecific genetic variation (the distance to the nearest neighbour) of the 73 mosquito species was 7% ranged from 0.3–12.9%. The identification of success rates based on the “Best Match,” “Best Close Match,” and “All Species Barcodes” methods were 97.7%, 91.6%, and 81%, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses of
Anopheles COI
sequences demonstrated a clear separation between almost all species (except for those between
An
.
baimaii
and
An
.
dirus
), with high bootstrap support values (97%–99%). Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses revealed potential sibling species of
An
.
annularis
,
An
.
tessellatus
, and
An
.
subpictus
in Thailand. Our results indicated that DNA barcoding is an effective molecular approach for the accurate identification of mosquitoes in Thailand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36137118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anopheles ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Culicidae ; Cytochrome ; Cytochrome oxidase ; Cytochrome-c oxidase ; Cytochromes ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA barcoding ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic diversity ; Identification ; Identification and classification ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Molecular biology ; Morphology ; Mosquitoes ; People and Places ; Phylogeny ; Public health ; Research and analysis methods ; Sibling species ; Taxonomy ; Thermal cycling</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0275090-e0275090</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Chaiphongpachara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Chaiphongpachara et al 2022 Chaiphongpachara et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9585-4241</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2716914087/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2716914087?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Yue, Bi-Song</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Changbunjong, Tanasak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laojun, Sedthapong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nutepsu, Teerayoot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwandittakul, Nantana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuntawong, Kewarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumruayphol, Suchada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn</creatorcontrib><title>Mitochondrial DNA barcoding of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The correct identification of mosquito species is important for effective mosquito vector control. However, the standard morphological identification of mosquito species based on the available keys is not easy with specimens in the field due to missing or damaged morphological features during mosquito collections, often leading to the misidentification of morphologically indistinguishable. To resolve this problem, we collected mosquito species across Thailand to gather genetic information, and evaluated the DNA barcoding efficacy for mosquito species identification in Thailand. A total of 310 mosquito samples, representing 73 mosquito species, were amplified using mitochondrial cytochrome
c
oxidase subunit I (
COI
) primers. The average maximum intraspecific genetic variation of the 73 mosquito species was 1% ranged from 0–5.7%. While, average minimum interspecific genetic variation (the distance to the nearest neighbour) of the 73 mosquito species was 7% ranged from 0.3–12.9%. The identification of success rates based on the “Best Match,” “Best Close Match,” and “All Species Barcodes” methods were 97.7%, 91.6%, and 81%, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses of
Anopheles COI
sequences demonstrated a clear separation between almost all species (except for those between
An
.
baimaii
and
An
.
dirus
), with high bootstrap support values (97%–99%). Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses revealed potential sibling species of
An
.
annularis
,
An
.
tessellatus
, and
An
.
subpictus
in Thailand. Our results indicated that DNA barcoding is an effective molecular approach for the accurate identification of mosquitoes in Thailand.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anopheles</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Cytochrome</subject><subject>Cytochrome oxidase</subject><subject>Cytochrome-c oxidase</subject><subject>Cytochromes</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA barcoding</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Research and analysis methods</subject><subject>Sibling species</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Thermal cycling</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkltvFCEUx4mxsbX6DUwk8aU-7MptYMYHk83Wtib18lCfCTCwS8PAFGZM_PaydjTWNDwcAr_zP1cAXmG0xlTgd7dpzlGF9ZiiXSMiGtShJ-AEd5SsOEH06T_3Y_C8lFuEGtpy_gwcU36QwO0J-PbZT8nsU-yzVwGef9lArbJJvY87mBwcUrmbKwLLaI23BZ6d-3GyWb2H2zl443tl30If4c1e-aBi_wIcORWKfbnYU_D94uPN9mp1_fXy03ZzvTKMsmnVtsyhXuuGKtQ4jVRHuSNcGYeZNcYRgZwlVjPeMMy00lh0RiOKrDKaKE5Pwet73TGkIpdmFEkE5h1mqBWV-LAQsx5sb2ycsgpyzH5Q-adMysuHP9Hv5S79kB1nhFJUBc4WgZzuZlsmOfhibKhl2jT_jiV4SxvaVfTNf-jjGS3UTgUrfXSpxjUHUbkRuEO4ES2r1PoRqp7eDt7UaTtf3x84sHsHk1Mp2bq_NWIkD4P-k4w87IpcdoX-AiJpshg</recordid><startdate>20220922</startdate><enddate>20220922</enddate><creator>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat</creator><creator>Changbunjong, Tanasak</creator><creator>Laojun, Sedthapong</creator><creator>Nutepsu, Teerayoot</creator><creator>Suwandittakul, Nantana</creator><creator>Kuntawong, Kewarin</creator><creator>Sumruayphol, Suchada</creator><creator>Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9585-4241</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220922</creationdate><title>Mitochondrial DNA barcoding of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand</title><author>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat ; Changbunjong, Tanasak ; Laojun, Sedthapong ; Nutepsu, Teerayoot ; Suwandittakul, Nantana ; Kuntawong, Kewarin ; Sumruayphol, Suchada ; Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anopheles</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Cytochrome</topic><topic>Cytochrome oxidase</topic><topic>Cytochrome-c oxidase</topic><topic>Cytochromes</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA barcoding</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Research and analysis methods</topic><topic>Sibling species</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Thermal cycling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Changbunjong, Tanasak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laojun, Sedthapong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nutepsu, Teerayoot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwandittakul, Nantana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuntawong, Kewarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumruayphol, Suchada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaiphongpachara, Tanawat</au><au>Changbunjong, Tanasak</au><au>Laojun, Sedthapong</au><au>Nutepsu, Teerayoot</au><au>Suwandittakul, Nantana</au><au>Kuntawong, Kewarin</au><au>Sumruayphol, Suchada</au><au>Ruangsittichai, Jiraporn</au><au>Yue, Bi-Song</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitochondrial DNA barcoding of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-09-22</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0275090</spage><epage>e0275090</epage><pages>e0275090-e0275090</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The correct identification of mosquito species is important for effective mosquito vector control. However, the standard morphological identification of mosquito species based on the available keys is not easy with specimens in the field due to missing or damaged morphological features during mosquito collections, often leading to the misidentification of morphologically indistinguishable. To resolve this problem, we collected mosquito species across Thailand to gather genetic information, and evaluated the DNA barcoding efficacy for mosquito species identification in Thailand. A total of 310 mosquito samples, representing 73 mosquito species, were amplified using mitochondrial cytochrome
c
oxidase subunit I (
COI
) primers. The average maximum intraspecific genetic variation of the 73 mosquito species was 1% ranged from 0–5.7%. While, average minimum interspecific genetic variation (the distance to the nearest neighbour) of the 73 mosquito species was 7% ranged from 0.3–12.9%. The identification of success rates based on the “Best Match,” “Best Close Match,” and “All Species Barcodes” methods were 97.7%, 91.6%, and 81%, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses of
Anopheles COI
sequences demonstrated a clear separation between almost all species (except for those between
An
.
baimaii
and
An
.
dirus
), with high bootstrap support values (97%–99%). Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses revealed potential sibling species of
An
.
annularis
,
An
.
tessellatus
, and
An
.
subpictus
in Thailand. Our results indicated that DNA barcoding is an effective molecular approach for the accurate identification of mosquitoes in Thailand.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36137118</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0275090</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9585-4241</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0275090-e0275090 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2716914087 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Anopheles Biology and Life Sciences Computer and Information Sciences Culicidae Cytochrome Cytochrome oxidase Cytochrome-c oxidase Cytochromes Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA barcoding Gene sequencing Genetic aspects Genetic diversity Identification Identification and classification Infectious diseases Laboratories Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Mitochondrial DNA Molecular biology Morphology Mosquitoes People and Places Phylogeny Public health Research and analysis methods Sibling species Taxonomy Thermal cycling |
title | Mitochondrial DNA barcoding of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitochondrial%20DNA%20barcoding%20of%20mosquito%20species%20(Diptera:%20Culicidae)%20in%20Thailand&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Chaiphongpachara,%20Tanawat&rft.date=2022-09-22&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0275090&rft.epage=e0275090&rft.pages=e0275090-e0275090&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0275090&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA719015784%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-884f0dbb53a05fb0a936f26acf14eccf270fe2eb465414bab179cb030eacb2a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716914087&rft_id=info:pmid/36137118&rft_galeid=A719015784&rfr_iscdi=true |