Loading…

Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits

The collection of biographical information (biodata) through CVs and application forms has many advantages, namely easiness of collection, acceptable validity, less prone to faking, and the fulfilment of legal requirements. However, its systematic use among practitioners is scarce. Two of the mains...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0274878-e0274878
Main Authors: Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J, Fernández-del-Río, Elena, Castro, Ángel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73
container_end_page e0274878
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0274878
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J
Fernández-del-Río, Elena
Castro, Ángel
description The collection of biographical information (biodata) through CVs and application forms has many advantages, namely easiness of collection, acceptable validity, less prone to faking, and the fulfilment of legal requirements. However, its systematic use among practitioners is scarce. Two of the mains reasons is the overlap with other constructs like personality and the lack of validated biodata scales in articles and public repositories. Aimed to fill this gap, García-Izquierdo and colleagues developed an 8-item scale able to generate positive applicant reactions, but they did not provide empirical evidence that their scale is able to predict job performance. The present paper was developed for this purpose, investigating the scale's relationship with four different dimensions of job performance (i.e., task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive behaviors, and adaptive performance) and its incremental validity with respect to Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits. The study comprises 528 employees from different organizations (M.sub.age = 39.51, SD = 14.25; 52.8% women, M.sub.experience = 17.06, SD = 13.27) which voluntarily agreed to participate filling a questionnaire with the variables of interest. Results provide evidence of the predictive validity of the biodata scale in a multi-occupational sample; identify that these biodata contribute to predicting two specific types of job performance: contextual performance and adaptive performance; shows that a brief job-related biodata scale achieves results comparable to those of most personality traits in predictive models of job performance dimensions; and provide evidence of the incremental predictive validity of biodata over the Big Five and the Dark Tetrad. As a whole, these results provide support for the use of the scale in researcher and applied settings, and contributes to the advance the knowledge of biodata for personnel selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0274878
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2719689553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A720368108</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c22a532e3e5f4705b5ac5c620b212a78</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A720368108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12LEzEUhgdR3LX6DwQDguhFaz4m83Ej1NXVwsKCrt6GM_loU2cmNUmL_SH-XzN2lB3ZCwkk4eTJm5M3OVn2lOAFYSV5vXV730O72LleLzAt86qs7mXnpGZ0XlDM7t-an2WPQthizFlVFA-zM1aQsqpqcp79XCaNY7ABOYMANd5qgxrrFERAQUKrEYS0sPNaWRmdH7ita9BOe-N8B71MRK-QjQHZXnrd6T5Ciw7QWmXjEbmD9ihuNHpr1-jSHk74O_Df0I2OHtQgFVxKY6BTICk9zh4YaIN-Mo6z7Mvl-5uLj_Or6w-ri-XVXBZFHeeGcEoMMYpWwBpWVxwXijMsS1YAyXmySSuuJC0bJmVZYIaZaRjPdWPAqJLNsmcn3V3rghgdDYKWpC6qmnOWiNWJUA62YudtB_4oHFjxO-D8WoCPVrZaSEqBM6qZ5iYvMW84SC6T_Q0lFMoqab0ZT9s3nVYyGeWhnYhOV3q7EWt3EDWneZGyn2UvRwHvvu91iKKzQeq2hV67_ZA3xTnDVepm2fN_0LtvN1Lr9NDC9salc-UgKpZJixUVwUPeizuo1JTurEzfz9gUn2x4NdmQmKh_xDXsQxCrz5_-n73-OmVf3GI3Gtq4Ca7dR-v6MAXzEyi9C8Fr89dkgsVQPX_cEEP1iLF62C_aCAu2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2719689553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J ; Fernández-del-Río, Elena ; Castro, Ángel</creator><contributor>Mahmoud, Ali B.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J ; Fernández-del-Río, Elena ; Castro, Ángel ; Mahmoud, Ali B.</creatorcontrib><description>The collection of biographical information (biodata) through CVs and application forms has many advantages, namely easiness of collection, acceptable validity, less prone to faking, and the fulfilment of legal requirements. However, its systematic use among practitioners is scarce. Two of the mains reasons is the overlap with other constructs like personality and the lack of validated biodata scales in articles and public repositories. Aimed to fill this gap, García-Izquierdo and colleagues developed an 8-item scale able to generate positive applicant reactions, but they did not provide empirical evidence that their scale is able to predict job performance. The present paper was developed for this purpose, investigating the scale's relationship with four different dimensions of job performance (i.e., task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive behaviors, and adaptive performance) and its incremental validity with respect to Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits. The study comprises 528 employees from different organizations (M.sub.age = 39.51, SD = 14.25; 52.8% women, M.sub.experience = 17.06, SD = 13.27) which voluntarily agreed to participate filling a questionnaire with the variables of interest. Results provide evidence of the predictive validity of the biodata scale in a multi-occupational sample; identify that these biodata contribute to predicting two specific types of job performance: contextual performance and adaptive performance; shows that a brief job-related biodata scale achieves results comparable to those of most personality traits in predictive models of job performance dimensions; and provide evidence of the incremental predictive validity of biodata over the Big Five and the Dark Tetrad. As a whole, these results provide support for the use of the scale in researcher and applied settings, and contributes to the advance the knowledge of biodata for personnel selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274878</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36178891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cognitive ability ; Empirical analysis ; Employee performance ; Employee selection ; Evaluation ; Job performance ; Managers ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Performance prediction ; Personality ; Personality traits ; Personnel selection ; Physical Sciences ; Prediction models ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Social skills ; Validity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0274878-e0274878</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Ramos-Villagrasa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Ramos-Villagrasa et al 2022 Ramos-Villagrasa et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8640-4097</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2719689553/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2719689553?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mahmoud, Ali B.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-del-Río, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Ángel</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The collection of biographical information (biodata) through CVs and application forms has many advantages, namely easiness of collection, acceptable validity, less prone to faking, and the fulfilment of legal requirements. However, its systematic use among practitioners is scarce. Two of the mains reasons is the overlap with other constructs like personality and the lack of validated biodata scales in articles and public repositories. Aimed to fill this gap, García-Izquierdo and colleagues developed an 8-item scale able to generate positive applicant reactions, but they did not provide empirical evidence that their scale is able to predict job performance. The present paper was developed for this purpose, investigating the scale's relationship with four different dimensions of job performance (i.e., task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive behaviors, and adaptive performance) and its incremental validity with respect to Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits. The study comprises 528 employees from different organizations (M.sub.age = 39.51, SD = 14.25; 52.8% women, M.sub.experience = 17.06, SD = 13.27) which voluntarily agreed to participate filling a questionnaire with the variables of interest. Results provide evidence of the predictive validity of the biodata scale in a multi-occupational sample; identify that these biodata contribute to predicting two specific types of job performance: contextual performance and adaptive performance; shows that a brief job-related biodata scale achieves results comparable to those of most personality traits in predictive models of job performance dimensions; and provide evidence of the incremental predictive validity of biodata over the Big Five and the Dark Tetrad. As a whole, these results provide support for the use of the scale in researcher and applied settings, and contributes to the advance the knowledge of biodata for personnel selection.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Employee performance</subject><subject>Employee selection</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Personnel selection</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social skills</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12LEzEUhgdR3LX6DwQDguhFaz4m83Ej1NXVwsKCrt6GM_loU2cmNUmL_SH-XzN2lB3ZCwkk4eTJm5M3OVn2lOAFYSV5vXV730O72LleLzAt86qs7mXnpGZ0XlDM7t-an2WPQthizFlVFA-zM1aQsqpqcp79XCaNY7ABOYMANd5qgxrrFERAQUKrEYS0sPNaWRmdH7ita9BOe-N8B71MRK-QjQHZXnrd6T5Ciw7QWmXjEbmD9ihuNHpr1-jSHk74O_Df0I2OHtQgFVxKY6BTICk9zh4YaIN-Mo6z7Mvl-5uLj_Or6w-ri-XVXBZFHeeGcEoMMYpWwBpWVxwXijMsS1YAyXmySSuuJC0bJmVZYIaZaRjPdWPAqJLNsmcn3V3rghgdDYKWpC6qmnOWiNWJUA62YudtB_4oHFjxO-D8WoCPVrZaSEqBM6qZ5iYvMW84SC6T_Q0lFMoqab0ZT9s3nVYyGeWhnYhOV3q7EWt3EDWneZGyn2UvRwHvvu91iKKzQeq2hV67_ZA3xTnDVepm2fN_0LtvN1Lr9NDC9salc-UgKpZJixUVwUPeizuo1JTurEzfz9gUn2x4NdmQmKh_xDXsQxCrz5_-n73-OmVf3GI3Gtq4Ca7dR-v6MAXzEyi9C8Fr89dkgsVQPX_cEEP1iLF62C_aCAu2</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J</creator><creator>Fernández-del-Río, Elena</creator><creator>Castro, Ángel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-4097</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits</title><author>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J ; Fernández-del-Río, Elena ; Castro, Ángel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Employee performance</topic><topic>Employee selection</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Personnel selection</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social skills</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-del-Río, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Ángel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J</au><au>Fernández-del-Río, Elena</au><au>Castro, Ángel</au><au>Mahmoud, Ali B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0274878</spage><epage>e0274878</epage><pages>e0274878-e0274878</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The collection of biographical information (biodata) through CVs and application forms has many advantages, namely easiness of collection, acceptable validity, less prone to faking, and the fulfilment of legal requirements. However, its systematic use among practitioners is scarce. Two of the mains reasons is the overlap with other constructs like personality and the lack of validated biodata scales in articles and public repositories. Aimed to fill this gap, García-Izquierdo and colleagues developed an 8-item scale able to generate positive applicant reactions, but they did not provide empirical evidence that their scale is able to predict job performance. The present paper was developed for this purpose, investigating the scale's relationship with four different dimensions of job performance (i.e., task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive behaviors, and adaptive performance) and its incremental validity with respect to Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits. The study comprises 528 employees from different organizations (M.sub.age = 39.51, SD = 14.25; 52.8% women, M.sub.experience = 17.06, SD = 13.27) which voluntarily agreed to participate filling a questionnaire with the variables of interest. Results provide evidence of the predictive validity of the biodata scale in a multi-occupational sample; identify that these biodata contribute to predicting two specific types of job performance: contextual performance and adaptive performance; shows that a brief job-related biodata scale achieves results comparable to those of most personality traits in predictive models of job performance dimensions; and provide evidence of the incremental predictive validity of biodata over the Big Five and the Dark Tetrad. As a whole, these results provide support for the use of the scale in researcher and applied settings, and contributes to the advance the knowledge of biodata for personnel selection.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36178891</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0274878</doi><tpages>e0274878</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-4097</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0274878-e0274878
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2719689553
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Behavior
Biology and Life Sciences
Cognitive ability
Empirical analysis
Employee performance
Employee selection
Evaluation
Job performance
Managers
Medicine and Health Sciences
Performance prediction
Personality
Personality traits
Personnel selection
Physical Sciences
Prediction models
Research and Analysis Methods
Social Sciences
Social skills
Validity
title Analysis of a brief biodata scale as a predictor of job performance and its incremental validity over the Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20a%20brief%20biodata%20scale%20as%20a%20predictor%20of%20job%20performance%20and%20its%20incremental%20validity%20over%20the%20Big%20Five%20and%20Dark%20Tetrad%20personality%20traits&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ramos-Villagrasa,%20Pedro%20J&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0274878&rft.epage=e0274878&rft.pages=e0274878-e0274878&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0274878&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA720368108%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-f1521f1fd28a3b398506d530c736a145371ed5dc27b3cc760303fb354ebfafd73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2719689553&rft_id=info:pmid/36178891&rft_galeid=A720368108&rfr_iscdi=true