Social stratification reflected in bone mineral density and stature: Spectral imaging and osteoarchaeological findings from medieval Norway

• Published in: PloS one 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275448-e0275448
• Main Authors: Brødholt, Elin T, Gautvik, Kaare M, Günther, Clara-Cecilie, Sjøvold, Torstein, Holck, Per
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 11th century; Age; Analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Bone density; Bone imaging; Bone mineral density; Bones; Children; Density; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Females; Human remains (Archaeology); Lifestyles; Living conditions; Males; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medieval period; Nutrition; Osteoporosis; People and Places; Poverty; Puberty; Risk factors; Sex differences; Social aspects; Social stratification; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomics; Young adults
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275448

This study presents skeletal material from five medieval burial sites in Eastern Norway, confined to one royal burial church, one Dominican monastery, and three burial sites representing parish populations. We combine osteological analysis and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, studying the remains of 227 individuals (102 females and 125 males) employing young, middle, and old adult age categories. The aim is to assess bone mineral density as a skeletal indicator of socioeconomic status including stature as a variable. We detected that socioeconomic status significantly affected bone mineral density and stature. Individuals of high status had higher bone mineral density (0.07 g/cm.sup.2, p = 0.003) and taller stature (1.85 cm, p = 0.017) than individuals from the parish population. We detected no significant relationship between young adult bone mineral density and socioeconomic status (p = 0.127 and 0.059 for females and males, respectively). For males, high young adult bone mineral density and stature varied concordantly in both status groups. In contrast, females of high status were significantly taller than females in the parish population (p = 0.011). Our findings indicate quite different conditions during growth and puberty for the two groups of females. The age-related pattern of bone variation also portrayed quite different trajectories for the two socioeconomic status groups of both sexes. We discuss sociocultural practices (living conditions during childhood and puberty, as well as nutritional and lifestyle factors in adult life), possibly explaining the differences in bone mineral density between the high-status and parish population groups. The observation of greater differences in bone mineral density and stature for females than males in the medieval society of Norway is also further discussed.