Loading…
Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic scoping review
The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has increased globally over the past decade since patient access to medicinal cannabis has been legislated across jurisdictions in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Yet, evidence relating to the effect of medical cannabis...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0269143-e0269143 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243 |
container_end_page | e0269143 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0269143 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Hallinan, Christine Mary Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh Conway, Mike Bonomo, Yvonne Ann |
description | The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has increased globally over the past decade since patient access to medicinal cannabis has been legislated across jurisdictions in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Yet, evidence relating to the effect of medical cannabis on the management of symptoms for a suite of conditions is only just emerging. Although there is considerable engagement from many stakeholders to add to the evidence base through randomized controlled trials, many gaps in the literature remain. Data from real-world and patient reported sources can provide opportunities to address this evidence deficit. This real-world data can be captured from a variety of sources such as found in routinely collected health care and health services records that include but are not limited to patient generated data from medical, administrative and claims data, patient reported data from surveys, wearable trackers, patient registries, and social media. In this systematic scoping review, we seek to understand the utility of online user generated text into the use of cannabis as a medicine. In this scoping review, we aimed to systematically search published literature to examine the extent, range, and nature of research that utilises user-generated content to examine to cannabis as a medicine. The objective of this methodological review is to synthesise primary research that uses social media discourse and internet search engine queries to answer the following questions: (i) In what way, is online user-generated text used as a data source in the investigation of cannabis as a medicine? (ii) What are the aims, data sources, methods, and research themes of studies using online user-generated text to discuss the medicinal use of cannabis. We conducted a manual search of primary research studies which used online user-generated text as a data source using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in October 2022. Editorials, letters, commentaries, surveys, protocols, and book chapters were excluded from the review. Forty-two studies were included in this review, twenty-two studies used manually labelled data, four studies used existing meta-data (Google trends/geo-location data), two studies used data that was manually coded using crowdsourcing services, and two used automated coding supplied by a social media analytics company, fifteen used computational methods for annotating data. Our review reflects a growing inter |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0269143 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2767424728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A733942800</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1523e0784e3b4a418544c5d89280ca74</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A733942800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QDgujFjE3SJqkXwrD4MbCw4Kq34TQ9ncnSSWaTdnX_vZmPXaayF9KWlvR53_ORnCx7SfMZ5ZJ-uPJDcNDNNt7hLGeiogV_lJ3SirOpYDl_fPR9kj2L8SrPS66EeJqdcCEEU5ydZvbSGwsdWWNjgTQ2mmQbkYBriHU9Boc9iQjBrMj1gMFiJN4RA85BbSOBdO_Exjr8SOYk3sYe19BbQ5LXxrolCXhj8ffz7EkLXcQXh_ck-_nl84-zb9Pzi6-Ls_n51IiK9dNGNKxVoi0r1kiWG2AiPSXQujVCSt4YSlVdSFqLpgaK1DCW59hSYNTUrOCT7PXed9P5qA9dippJIQtWyFT2JFvsicbDld4Eu4Zwqz1YvVvwYakhpAI61LRkHHOpCuR1AQVVZVGYslEVUyk1uY326RBtqFMbDLo-QDcyHf9xdqWX_kZXqlRKsGTw7mAQfGpw7PU6bQJ2HTj0wy5vxbjiQib0zT_ow9UdqCWkAqxrfYprtqZ6LjmvipR6nqjZA1S6Glxbk45Ua9P6SPB-JEhMj3_6JQwx6sXl9_9nL36N2bdH7Aqh61fRd0NvvYtjsNiDJvgYA7b3Taa53k7EXTf0diL0YSKS7NXxBt2L7kaA_wWaLwXK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767424728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic scoping review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hallinan, Christine Mary ; Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh ; Conway, Mike ; Bonomo, Yvonne Ann</creator><contributor>Grundy, Quinn</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Christine Mary ; Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh ; Conway, Mike ; Bonomo, Yvonne Ann ; Grundy, Quinn</creatorcontrib><description>The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has increased globally over the past decade since patient access to medicinal cannabis has been legislated across jurisdictions in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Yet, evidence relating to the effect of medical cannabis on the management of symptoms for a suite of conditions is only just emerging. Although there is considerable engagement from many stakeholders to add to the evidence base through randomized controlled trials, many gaps in the literature remain. Data from real-world and patient reported sources can provide opportunities to address this evidence deficit. This real-world data can be captured from a variety of sources such as found in routinely collected health care and health services records that include but are not limited to patient generated data from medical, administrative and claims data, patient reported data from surveys, wearable trackers, patient registries, and social media. In this systematic scoping review, we seek to understand the utility of online user generated text into the use of cannabis as a medicine. In this scoping review, we aimed to systematically search published literature to examine the extent, range, and nature of research that utilises user-generated content to examine to cannabis as a medicine. The objective of this methodological review is to synthesise primary research that uses social media discourse and internet search engine queries to answer the following questions: (i) In what way, is online user-generated text used as a data source in the investigation of cannabis as a medicine? (ii) What are the aims, data sources, methods, and research themes of studies using online user-generated text to discuss the medicinal use of cannabis. We conducted a manual search of primary research studies which used online user-generated text as a data source using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in October 2022. Editorials, letters, commentaries, surveys, protocols, and book chapters were excluded from the review. Forty-two studies were included in this review, twenty-two studies used manually labelled data, four studies used existing meta-data (Google trends/geo-location data), two studies used data that was manually coded using crowdsourcing services, and two used automated coding supplied by a social media analytics company, fifteen used computational methods for annotating data. Our review reflects a growing interest in the use of user-generated content for public health surveillance. It also demonstrates the need for the development of a systematic approach for evaluating the quality of social media studies and highlights the utility of automatic processing and computational methods (machine learning technologies) for large social media datasets. This systematic scoping review has shown that user-generated content as a data source for studying cannabis as a medicine provides another means to understand how cannabis is perceived and used in the community. As such, it provides another potential 'tool' with which to engage in pharmacovigilance of, not only cannabis as a medicine, but also other novel therapeutics as they enter the market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269143</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36662832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Cannabis ; Clinical trials ; Complications and side effects ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer applications ; Data collection ; Data sources ; Database searching ; Delivery of Health Care ; Digital media ; Health aspects ; Health services ; Health surveillance ; Humans ; Influence ; Internet ; Internet/Web search services ; Keywords ; Machine learning ; Marketing ; Medical marijuana ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental disorders ; Online searching ; Patient outcomes ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Pharmacovigilance ; Public health ; Queries ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Search engines ; Social discrimination learning ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Surveys ; Trends ; United Kingdom ; User generated content ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0269143-e0269143</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Hallinan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Hallinan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Hallinan et al 2023 Hallinan et al</rights><rights>2023 Hallinan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2583-0687 ; 0000-0002-0471-4444</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767424728/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767424728?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36662832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grundy, Quinn</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Christine Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Yvonne Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic scoping review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has increased globally over the past decade since patient access to medicinal cannabis has been legislated across jurisdictions in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Yet, evidence relating to the effect of medical cannabis on the management of symptoms for a suite of conditions is only just emerging. Although there is considerable engagement from many stakeholders to add to the evidence base through randomized controlled trials, many gaps in the literature remain. Data from real-world and patient reported sources can provide opportunities to address this evidence deficit. This real-world data can be captured from a variety of sources such as found in routinely collected health care and health services records that include but are not limited to patient generated data from medical, administrative and claims data, patient reported data from surveys, wearable trackers, patient registries, and social media. In this systematic scoping review, we seek to understand the utility of online user generated text into the use of cannabis as a medicine. In this scoping review, we aimed to systematically search published literature to examine the extent, range, and nature of research that utilises user-generated content to examine to cannabis as a medicine. The objective of this methodological review is to synthesise primary research that uses social media discourse and internet search engine queries to answer the following questions: (i) In what way, is online user-generated text used as a data source in the investigation of cannabis as a medicine? (ii) What are the aims, data sources, methods, and research themes of studies using online user-generated text to discuss the medicinal use of cannabis. We conducted a manual search of primary research studies which used online user-generated text as a data source using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in October 2022. Editorials, letters, commentaries, surveys, protocols, and book chapters were excluded from the review. Forty-two studies were included in this review, twenty-two studies used manually labelled data, four studies used existing meta-data (Google trends/geo-location data), two studies used data that was manually coded using crowdsourcing services, and two used automated coding supplied by a social media analytics company, fifteen used computational methods for annotating data. Our review reflects a growing interest in the use of user-generated content for public health surveillance. It also demonstrates the need for the development of a systematic approach for evaluating the quality of social media studies and highlights the utility of automatic processing and computational methods (machine learning technologies) for large social media datasets. This systematic scoping review has shown that user-generated content as a data source for studying cannabis as a medicine provides another means to understand how cannabis is perceived and used in the community. As such, it provides another potential 'tool' with which to engage in pharmacovigilance of, not only cannabis as a medicine, but also other novel therapeutics as they enter the market.</description><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data sources</subject><subject>Database searching</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet/Web search services</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Medical marijuana</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Online searching</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Queries</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Social discrimination learning</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>User generated content</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QDgujFjE3SJqkXwrD4MbCw4Kq34TQ9ncnSSWaTdnX_vZmPXaayF9KWlvR53_ORnCx7SfMZ5ZJ-uPJDcNDNNt7hLGeiogV_lJ3SirOpYDl_fPR9kj2L8SrPS66EeJqdcCEEU5ydZvbSGwsdWWNjgTQ2mmQbkYBriHU9Boc9iQjBrMj1gMFiJN4RA85BbSOBdO_Exjr8SOYk3sYe19BbQ5LXxrolCXhj8ffz7EkLXcQXh_ck-_nl84-zb9Pzi6-Ls_n51IiK9dNGNKxVoi0r1kiWG2AiPSXQujVCSt4YSlVdSFqLpgaK1DCW59hSYNTUrOCT7PXed9P5qA9dippJIQtWyFT2JFvsicbDld4Eu4Zwqz1YvVvwYakhpAI61LRkHHOpCuR1AQVVZVGYslEVUyk1uY326RBtqFMbDLo-QDcyHf9xdqWX_kZXqlRKsGTw7mAQfGpw7PU6bQJ2HTj0wy5vxbjiQib0zT_ow9UdqCWkAqxrfYprtqZ6LjmvipR6nqjZA1S6Glxbk45Ua9P6SPB-JEhMj3_6JQwx6sXl9_9nL36N2bdH7Aqh61fRd0NvvYtjsNiDJvgYA7b3Taa53k7EXTf0diL0YSKS7NXxBt2L7kaA_wWaLwXK</recordid><startdate>20230120</startdate><enddate>20230120</enddate><creator>Hallinan, Christine Mary</creator><creator>Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh</creator><creator>Conway, Mike</creator><creator>Bonomo, Yvonne Ann</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-0687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-4444</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230120</creationdate><title>Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic scoping review</title><author>Hallinan, Christine Mary ; Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh ; Conway, Mike ; Bonomo, Yvonne Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data sources</topic><topic>Database searching</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet/Web search services</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Medical marijuana</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Online searching</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Queries</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Social discrimination learning</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>User generated content</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallinan, Christine Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Yvonne Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallinan, Christine Mary</au><au>Khademi Habibabadi, Sedigheh</au><au>Conway, Mike</au><au>Bonomo, Yvonne Ann</au><au>Grundy, Quinn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic scoping review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-01-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0269143</spage><epage>e0269143</epage><pages>e0269143-e0269143</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes has increased globally over the past decade since patient access to medicinal cannabis has been legislated across jurisdictions in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Yet, evidence relating to the effect of medical cannabis on the management of symptoms for a suite of conditions is only just emerging. Although there is considerable engagement from many stakeholders to add to the evidence base through randomized controlled trials, many gaps in the literature remain. Data from real-world and patient reported sources can provide opportunities to address this evidence deficit. This real-world data can be captured from a variety of sources such as found in routinely collected health care and health services records that include but are not limited to patient generated data from medical, administrative and claims data, patient reported data from surveys, wearable trackers, patient registries, and social media. In this systematic scoping review, we seek to understand the utility of online user generated text into the use of cannabis as a medicine. In this scoping review, we aimed to systematically search published literature to examine the extent, range, and nature of research that utilises user-generated content to examine to cannabis as a medicine. The objective of this methodological review is to synthesise primary research that uses social media discourse and internet search engine queries to answer the following questions: (i) In what way, is online user-generated text used as a data source in the investigation of cannabis as a medicine? (ii) What are the aims, data sources, methods, and research themes of studies using online user-generated text to discuss the medicinal use of cannabis. We conducted a manual search of primary research studies which used online user-generated text as a data source using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in October 2022. Editorials, letters, commentaries, surveys, protocols, and book chapters were excluded from the review. Forty-two studies were included in this review, twenty-two studies used manually labelled data, four studies used existing meta-data (Google trends/geo-location data), two studies used data that was manually coded using crowdsourcing services, and two used automated coding supplied by a social media analytics company, fifteen used computational methods for annotating data. Our review reflects a growing interest in the use of user-generated content for public health surveillance. It also demonstrates the need for the development of a systematic approach for evaluating the quality of social media studies and highlights the utility of automatic processing and computational methods (machine learning technologies) for large social media datasets. This systematic scoping review has shown that user-generated content as a data source for studying cannabis as a medicine provides another means to understand how cannabis is perceived and used in the community. As such, it provides another potential 'tool' with which to engage in pharmacovigilance of, not only cannabis as a medicine, but also other novel therapeutics as they enter the market.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36662832</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0269143</doi><tpages>e0269143</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-0687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-4444</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0269143-e0269143 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2767424728 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Cannabis Clinical trials Complications and side effects Computer and Information Sciences Computer applications Data collection Data sources Database searching Delivery of Health Care Digital media Health aspects Health services Health surveillance Humans Influence Internet Internet/Web search services Keywords Machine learning Marketing Medical marijuana Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Mental disorders Online searching Patient outcomes Patient safety Patients Pharmacovigilance Public health Queries Research and Analysis Methods Search engines Social discrimination learning Social Media Social networks Social Sciences Surveys Trends United Kingdom User generated content Validation studies Validity |
title | Social media discourse and internet search queries on cannabis as a medicine: A systematic scoping review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20media%20discourse%20and%20internet%20search%20queries%20on%20cannabis%20as%20a%20medicine:%20A%20systematic%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hallinan,%20Christine%20Mary&rft.date=2023-01-20&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0269143&rft.epage=e0269143&rft.pages=e0269143-e0269143&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0269143&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA733942800%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d6d2f86f592d720ca26ca25a1bfc6773dc118b471b6dba1e1c2200ef1a21cb243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767424728&rft_id=info:pmid/36662832&rft_galeid=A733942800&rfr_iscdi=true |