Jumping vs. running: Effects of exercise modality on aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance after a six-week high-intensity interval training

• Published in: PloS one 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0281737-e0281737
• Main Authors: Venegas-Carro, María, Herring, Joshua T, Riehle, Simon, Kramer, Andreas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation; Aerobic capacity; Aerobic exercises; Aerobics; Ankle; Biology and Life Sciences; Comparative analysis; Endurance capacity; Exercise; Exercise - physiology; Exercise Test; Female; Health aspects; Heart rate; High-Intensity Interval Training - methods; Humans; Interval training; Jumping; Knee; Medicine and Health Sciences; Muscle strength; Muscle Strength - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Muscles; Muscular function; Physical fitness; Physical training; Physiological aspects; Plantar flexion; Resistance Training - methods; Running; Training; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281737

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has proven to be effective in improving endurance capacity and muscle endurance. However, its potential to improve other aspects of physical performance such as strength and power has not been well explored, and most research studies used only running and cycling as exercise modalities. Here, we compared the effects of jumping versus running as exercise modalities during a 6-week HIIT. 46 participants (24±3 years, 171±9 cm, 68±13 kg, 22 women) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: countermovement jump training, running training, or control. The two training groups underwent a 6-week HIIT with 3 training sessions per week. Both training protocols had identical training frequency, number of series and work/rest durations (on average 7 series of 25s, with a rest of 25s between series). Before and after the training period, aerobic capacity and neuromuscular performance were assessed. Analyses of variance revealed a significant group*time interaction effect for maximal aerobic capacity (p = 0.004), and post hoc analyses showed a significant increase in the running group (p < .001, +7.6%). Analyses of the maximal voluntary contraction revealed only a significant increase in the jumping group (plantar flexion +12.8%, knee extension +8.2%). No interaction effects were found for maximal power or jump height. Despite identical programming, the choice of exercise mode profoundly affected the training adaptations: the running group significantly increased aerobic capacity, and the jump group significantly increased leg strength. These results underline the importance of exercise modality in physical performance adaptations.