Human resource time commitments and associated costs of Community Caregiver outreach team operations in South Africa

• Published in: PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0282425-e0282425
• Main Authors: Mukora, Rachel, Thompson, Ryan R, Hippner, Piotr, Pelusa, Resignation, Mothibi, Martha, Lessells, Richard, Grant, Alison D, Fielding, Katherine, Velen, Kavindhran, Charalambous, Salome, Dowdy, David W, Sohn, Hojoon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Caregivers; Childrens health; Clinics; Contact tracing; Data collection; Health care policy; Health services; HIV; House Calls; Households; Human immunodeficiency virus; Human resources; Humans; Maternal & child health; Medical care, Cost of; Medicine and Health Sciences; Operating costs; People and places; Public health; Services; Social Sciences; South Africa; Supervision; Teams; Tuberculosis; Workforce; Workload; Workloads
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282425

In South Africa, Community Caregivers (CCGs) visit households to provide basic healthcare services including those for tuberculosis and HIV. However, CCG workloads, costs, and time burden are largely unknown. Our objective was to assess the workloads and operational costs for CCG teams operating in different settings in South Africa. Between March and October 2018, we collected standardized self-reported activity time forms from 11 CCG pairs working at two public health clinics in Ekurhuleni district, South Africa. CCG workloads were assessed based on activity unit times, per-household visit time, and mean daily number of successful household visits. Using activity-based times and CCG operating cost data, we assessed CCG annual and per-household visit costs (USD 2019) from the health system perspective. CCGs in clinic 1 (peri-urban, 7 CCG pairs) and 2 (urban, informal settlement; 4 CCG pairs) served an area of 3.1 km2 and 0.6 km2 with 8,035 and 5,200 registered households, respectively. CCG pairs spent a median 236 minutes per day conducting field activities at clinic 1 versus 235 minutes at clinic 2. CCG pairs at clinic 1 spent 49.5% of this time at households (versus traveling), compared to 35.0% at clinic 2. On average, CCG pairs successfully visited 9.5 vs 6.7 households per day for clinics 1 and 2, respectively. At clinic 1, 2.7% of household visits were unsuccessful, versus 28.5% at clinic 2. Total annual operating costs were higher in clinic 1 ($71,780 vs $49,097) but cost per successful visit was lower ($3.58) than clinic 2 ($5.85). CCG home visits were more frequent, successful, and less costly in clinic 1, which served a larger and more formalized settlement. The variability in workload and cost observed across pairs and clinics suggests that circumstantial factors and CCG needs must be carefully assessed for optimized CCG outreach operations.