Inferring incompetence from employment status: An audit-like experiment

Audit studies demonstrate that unemployed people are less likely to receive a callback when they apply for a job than employed candidates, the reason for this is unclear. Across two experiments (N = 461), we examine whether the perceived competence of unemployed candidates accounts for this disparit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0280596-e0280596
Main Authors: Okoroji, Celestin, Gleibs, Ilka H, Howard, Simon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Audits
Bias
Causes of
Disabled Persons
Economic aspects
Employee selection
Employment
Evaluation
Hiring
Humans
Labor market
Medical ethics
Morality
Perceptions
Personnel Selection
Physical Sciences
Research and Analysis Methods
Research ethics
Science Policy
Skewness
Social Sciences
Stereotypes
Stigma
Unemployment
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f183ebbcbf591b26eced0d148a2f57b8942c46cb6bf053268aee2abd7286fe93
container_end_page e0280596
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0280596
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Okoroji, Celestin
Gleibs, Ilka H
Howard, Simon
description Audit studies demonstrate that unemployed people are less likely to receive a callback when they apply for a job than employed candidates, the reason for this is unclear. Across two experiments (N = 461), we examine whether the perceived competence of unemployed candidates accounts for this disparity. In both studies, participants assessed one of two equivalent curriculum vitae's, differing only on the current employment status. We find that unemployed applicants are less likely to be offered an interview or hired. The relationship between the employment status of the applicant and these employment-related outcomes is mediated by the perceived competence of the applicant. We conducted a mini meta-analysis, finding that the effect size for the difference in employment outcomes was d = .274 and d = .307 respectively, while the estimated indirect effect was -.151[-.241, -.062]. These results offer a mechanism for the differential outcomes of job candidates by employment status.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0280596
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2785189004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A740267106</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_531383075fea4176aa5c96b5da4cd66a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A740267106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f183ebbcbf591b26eced0d148a2f57b8942c46cb6bf053268aee2abd7286fe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguhFx3y0aeOFMCy6Diws6OJtSNOTmYxtMiap7P57M053mcpeSC4Skue85yNvlr3EaIFpjT9s3eit7Bc7Z2GBSIMqzh5lp5hTUjCC6OOj80n2LIQtQhVtGHuanVDWcIo4Oc0uVlaD98auc2OVG3YQwSrItXdDDsOud7cD2JiHKOMYPuZLm8uxM7HozU_I4WYH3uyB59kTLfsAL6b9LLv-8vn6_GtxeXWxOl9eFoqVOBYaNxTaVrW64rglDBR0qMNlI4mu6rbhJVElUy1rdSqWsEYCENl2NWmYBk7PstcH2VRYENMIgiB1U-GGI1QmYnUgOie3Ypeqk_5WOGnE3wvn10L6aFQPoqKYNhTVlQZZ4ppJWSnO2qqTpeoYk0nr05RtbAfoVOrTy34mOn-xZiPW7rfgnNe8Rkng3STg3a8RQhSDCQr6Xlpw41Q3Z4zghL75B324u4lay9SAsdqlvGovKpZ1iQirMWKJWjxApdXBYFTyizbpfhbwfhaQmAg3cS3HEMTq-7f_Z69-zNm3R-wGZB83wfVjNM6GOVgeQOVdCB70_ZAxEnu7301D7O0uJrunsFfHH3QfdOdv-gcvWfrl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785189004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inferring incompetence from employment status: An audit-like experiment</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Okoroji, Celestin ; Gleibs, Ilka H ; Howard, Simon</creator><contributor>Brito-Costa, Sónia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Okoroji, Celestin ; Gleibs, Ilka H ; Howard, Simon ; Brito-Costa, Sónia</creatorcontrib><description>Audit studies demonstrate that unemployed people are less likely to receive a callback when they apply for a job than employed candidates, the reason for this is unclear. Across two experiments (N = 461), we examine whether the perceived competence of unemployed candidates accounts for this disparity. In both studies, participants assessed one of two equivalent curriculum vitae's, differing only on the current employment status. We find that unemployed applicants are less likely to be offered an interview or hired. The relationship between the employment status of the applicant and these employment-related outcomes is mediated by the perceived competence of the applicant. We conducted a mini meta-analysis, finding that the effect size for the difference in employment outcomes was d = .274 and d = .307 respectively, while the estimated indirect effect was -.151[-.241, -.062]. These results offer a mechanism for the differential outcomes of job candidates by employment status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280596</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36893092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Audits ; Bias ; Causes of ; Disabled Persons ; Economic aspects ; Employee selection ; Employment ; Evaluation ; Hiring ; Humans ; Labor market ; Medical ethics ; Morality ; Perceptions ; Personnel Selection ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research ethics ; Science Policy ; Skewness ; Social Sciences ; Stereotypes ; Stigma ; Unemployment ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0280596-e0280596</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Okoroji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Okoroji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Okoroji et al 2023 Okoroji et al</rights><rights>2023 Okoroji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f183ebbcbf591b26eced0d148a2f57b8942c46cb6bf053268aee2abd7286fe93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6238-7074 ; 0000-0002-9913-250X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785189004/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785189004?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,38515,43894,44589,53790,53792,74283,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36893092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Brito-Costa, Sónia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Okoroji, Celestin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleibs, Ilka H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Inferring incompetence from employment status: An audit-like experiment</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Audit studies demonstrate that unemployed people are less likely to receive a callback when they apply for a job than employed candidates, the reason for this is unclear. Across two experiments (N = 461), we examine whether the perceived competence of unemployed candidates accounts for this disparity. In both studies, participants assessed one of two equivalent curriculum vitae's, differing only on the current employment status. We find that unemployed applicants are less likely to be offered an interview or hired. The relationship between the employment status of the applicant and these employment-related outcomes is mediated by the perceived competence of the applicant. We conducted a mini meta-analysis, finding that the effect size for the difference in employment outcomes was d = .274 and d = .307 respectively, while the estimated indirect effect was -.151[-.241, -.062]. These results offer a mechanism for the differential outcomes of job candidates by employment status.</description><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Causes of</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Employee selection</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Skewness</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguhFx3y0aeOFMCy6Diws6OJtSNOTmYxtMiap7P57M053mcpeSC4Skue85yNvlr3EaIFpjT9s3eit7Bc7Z2GBSIMqzh5lp5hTUjCC6OOj80n2LIQtQhVtGHuanVDWcIo4Oc0uVlaD98auc2OVG3YQwSrItXdDDsOud7cD2JiHKOMYPuZLm8uxM7HozU_I4WYH3uyB59kTLfsAL6b9LLv-8vn6_GtxeXWxOl9eFoqVOBYaNxTaVrW64rglDBR0qMNlI4mu6rbhJVElUy1rdSqWsEYCENl2NWmYBk7PstcH2VRYENMIgiB1U-GGI1QmYnUgOie3Ypeqk_5WOGnE3wvn10L6aFQPoqKYNhTVlQZZ4ppJWSnO2qqTpeoYk0nr05RtbAfoVOrTy34mOn-xZiPW7rfgnNe8Rkng3STg3a8RQhSDCQr6Xlpw41Q3Z4zghL75B324u4lay9SAsdqlvGovKpZ1iQirMWKJWjxApdXBYFTyizbpfhbwfhaQmAg3cS3HEMTq-7f_Z69-zNm3R-wGZB83wfVjNM6GOVgeQOVdCB70_ZAxEnu7301D7O0uJrunsFfHH3QfdOdv-gcvWfrl</recordid><startdate>20230309</startdate><enddate>20230309</enddate><creator>Okoroji, Celestin</creator><creator>Gleibs, Ilka H</creator><creator>Howard, Simon</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-7074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9913-250X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230309</creationdate><title>Inferring incompetence from employment status: An audit-like experiment</title><author>Okoroji, Celestin ; Gleibs, Ilka H ; Howard, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f183ebbcbf591b26eced0d148a2f57b8942c46cb6bf053268aee2abd7286fe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Causes of</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Employee selection</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Skewness</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okoroji, Celestin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleibs, Ilka H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okoroji, Celestin</au><au>Gleibs, Ilka H</au><au>Howard, Simon</au><au>Brito-Costa, Sónia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inferring incompetence from employment status: An audit-like experiment</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-03-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0280596</spage><epage>e0280596</epage><pages>e0280596-e0280596</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Audit studies demonstrate that unemployed people are less likely to receive a callback when they apply for a job than employed candidates, the reason for this is unclear. Across two experiments (N = 461), we examine whether the perceived competence of unemployed candidates accounts for this disparity. In both studies, participants assessed one of two equivalent curriculum vitae's, differing only on the current employment status. We find that unemployed applicants are less likely to be offered an interview or hired. The relationship between the employment status of the applicant and these employment-related outcomes is mediated by the perceived competence of the applicant. We conducted a mini meta-analysis, finding that the effect size for the difference in employment outcomes was d = .274 and d = .307 respectively, while the estimated indirect effect was -.151[-.241, -.062]. These results offer a mechanism for the differential outcomes of job candidates by employment status.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36893092</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0280596</doi><tpages>e0280596</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-7074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9913-250X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0280596-e0280596
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2785189004
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Audits
Bias
Causes of
Disabled Persons
Economic aspects
Employee selection
Employment
Evaluation
Hiring
Humans
Labor market
Medical ethics
Morality
Perceptions
Personnel Selection
Physical Sciences
Research and Analysis Methods
Research ethics
Science Policy
Skewness
Social Sciences
Stereotypes
Stigma
Unemployment
United Kingdom
title Inferring incompetence from employment status: An audit-like experiment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A22%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inferring%20incompetence%20from%20employment%20status:%20An%20audit-like%20experiment&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Okoroji,%20Celestin&rft.date=2023-03-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0280596&rft.epage=e0280596&rft.pages=e0280596-e0280596&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0280596&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA740267106%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f183ebbcbf591b26eced0d148a2f57b8942c46cb6bf053268aee2abd7286fe93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785189004&rft_id=info:pmid/36893092&rft_galeid=A740267106&rfr_iscdi=true