Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in upper body exercise

This study examined whether differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (local; RPEL and central; RPEC) and overall RPE (RPEO) were different between exercise modes (upper- versus lower body) and/or changed after upper body training, providing relevant input for upper body exercise prescripti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0283620-e0283620
Main Authors: Abonie, Ulric S, Oldenburg, Marloes, van der Woude, Lucas, Hettinga, Florentina J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biology and Life Sciences
Carbon dioxide
Cycles
Evaluation
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise intensity
Exercise Test
Exercise Therapy
Fitness equipment
Heart rate
Heart Rate - physiology
Humans
Medicine and Health Sciences
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Perceptions
Physical Exertion - physiology
Physical fitness
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Ratings
Social Sciences
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23
container_end_page e0283620
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0283620
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Abonie, Ulric S
Oldenburg, Marloes
van der Woude, Lucas
Hettinga, Florentina J
description This study examined whether differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (local; RPEL and central; RPEC) and overall RPE (RPEO) were different between exercise modes (upper- versus lower body) and/or changed after upper body training, providing relevant input for upper body exercise prescription/regulation. Eight rowers completed an incremental cycling test (CY), and incremental handcycle (HC) tests before (HCpre) and after three weeks of handcycle training (HCpost). RPEc was higher during CY (17.4±2.4) compared to HCpost (15.9±1.9). However, RPEo was higher during HCpost (9.1±0.6) compared to CY (8.3±1.1). During the HC tests, RPEL was consistently higher than RPEO at the same PO. Training resulted in higher RPEc (HCpre: 14.6±2.6; HCpost: 15.9±1.9) and RPEo (HCpre: 7.9±0.9; HCpost: 9.1±0.6). No differences were found for RPEL between CY and HCpost (8.7±1.1; 9.3±0.4) and after HC training (HCpre: 9.1±1.0; HCpost: 9.3±0.4). At the point of exhaustion, RPEc was higher in CY than during HCpre and HCpost, suggesting RPEC is not causing exercise termination in HC. Furthermore, RPEL is perceived higher than RPEO during all stages of the incremental HC tests compared to CY. This suggests that in contrast to cycling, local factors during arm work are perceived more strongly than central or overall cues of exertion.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0283620
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2790304519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A742879674</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_90b06ecea3434a9d81fd298786316caf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A742879674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkltr2zAUx8XYWDtv32BshsHYHpLpYsvW0yjZLVAo7PYqZOkoUXCsTLJL--2nJG6JRx-GHyyOfufyP_oj9JLgOWEV-bDxQ-hUO9_5DuaY1oxT_AidE8HoLB3Z45PzGXoW4wbjktWcP0VnjAtOalaeo8UnZy0E6HqnejB5UL3rVjH3Nt9B0OCuUxBuIPTOd7nr8mGX4nnjze0hrF2E5-iJVW2EF-M_Q7--fP65-Da7vPq6XFxczjQXrJ9VmhpFSkFtYxgHXIKyDCg2gnLd1LTQZWk0NoRrq8pKF0LjsjKqJqrRXFOWodfHurvWRznqj5JWAjNclElthpZHwni1kbvgtircSq-cPAR8WEmVlOgWpMAN5qBBsYIVSpiaWENFXdWcpQHSZBn6OHYbmi0YnVYUVDspOr3p3Fqu_LUkGLOkhqQK78YKwf8ZIPZy66KGtlUd-OEweHrJkqeWGXrzD_qwvJFaqaTAddanxnpfVF5UBa0rwasiUfMHqPQZ2Dqd3GJdik8S3k8SEtPDTb9SQ4xy-eP7_7NXv6fs2xN2Dart19G3w95KcQoWR1AHH2MAe79lguXe7HfbkHuzy9HsKe3V6QvdJ925m_0FvBr54Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2790304519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in upper body exercise</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Abonie, Ulric S ; Oldenburg, Marloes ; van der Woude, Lucas ; Hettinga, Florentina J</creator><contributor>Boullosa, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Abonie, Ulric S ; Oldenburg, Marloes ; van der Woude, Lucas ; Hettinga, Florentina J ; Boullosa, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined whether differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (local; RPEL and central; RPEC) and overall RPE (RPEO) were different between exercise modes (upper- versus lower body) and/or changed after upper body training, providing relevant input for upper body exercise prescription/regulation. Eight rowers completed an incremental cycling test (CY), and incremental handcycle (HC) tests before (HCpre) and after three weeks of handcycle training (HCpost). RPEc was higher during CY (17.4±2.4) compared to HCpost (15.9±1.9). However, RPEo was higher during HCpost (9.1±0.6) compared to CY (8.3±1.1). During the HC tests, RPEL was consistently higher than RPEO at the same PO. Training resulted in higher RPEc (HCpre: 14.6±2.6; HCpost: 15.9±1.9) and RPEo (HCpre: 7.9±0.9; HCpost: 9.1±0.6). No differences were found for RPEL between CY and HCpost (8.7±1.1; 9.3±0.4) and after HC training (HCpre: 9.1±1.0; HCpost: 9.3±0.4). At the point of exhaustion, RPEc was higher in CY than during HCpre and HCpost, suggesting RPEC is not causing exercise termination in HC. Furthermore, RPEL is perceived higher than RPEO during all stages of the incremental HC tests compared to CY. This suggests that in contrast to cycling, local factors during arm work are perceived more strongly than central or overall cues of exertion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36961835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Cycles ; Evaluation ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise intensity ; Exercise Test ; Exercise Therapy ; Fitness equipment ; Heart rate ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Perceptions ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Physical fitness ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Ratings ; Social Sciences ; Training</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0283620-e0283620</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Abonie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Abonie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Abonie et al 2023 Abonie et al</rights><rights>2023 Abonie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8472-334X ; 0000-0003-2509-4413 ; 0000-0002-7027-8126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2790304519/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2790304519?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36961835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Boullosa, Daniel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Abonie, Ulric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldenburg, Marloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Woude, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hettinga, Florentina J</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in upper body exercise</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This study examined whether differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (local; RPEL and central; RPEC) and overall RPE (RPEO) were different between exercise modes (upper- versus lower body) and/or changed after upper body training, providing relevant input for upper body exercise prescription/regulation. Eight rowers completed an incremental cycling test (CY), and incremental handcycle (HC) tests before (HCpre) and after three weeks of handcycle training (HCpost). RPEc was higher during CY (17.4±2.4) compared to HCpost (15.9±1.9). However, RPEo was higher during HCpost (9.1±0.6) compared to CY (8.3±1.1). During the HC tests, RPEL was consistently higher than RPEO at the same PO. Training resulted in higher RPEc (HCpre: 14.6±2.6; HCpost: 15.9±1.9) and RPEo (HCpre: 7.9±0.9; HCpost: 9.1±0.6). No differences were found for RPEL between CY and HCpost (8.7±1.1; 9.3±0.4) and after HC training (HCpre: 9.1±1.0; HCpost: 9.3±0.4). At the point of exhaustion, RPEc was higher in CY than during HCpre and HCpost, suggesting RPEC is not causing exercise termination in HC. Furthermore, RPEL is perceived higher than RPEO during all stages of the incremental HC tests compared to CY. This suggests that in contrast to cycling, local factors during arm work are perceived more strongly than central or overall cues of exertion.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise intensity</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkltr2zAUx8XYWDtv32BshsHYHpLpYsvW0yjZLVAo7PYqZOkoUXCsTLJL--2nJG6JRx-GHyyOfufyP_oj9JLgOWEV-bDxQ-hUO9_5DuaY1oxT_AidE8HoLB3Z45PzGXoW4wbjktWcP0VnjAtOalaeo8UnZy0E6HqnejB5UL3rVjH3Nt9B0OCuUxBuIPTOd7nr8mGX4nnjze0hrF2E5-iJVW2EF-M_Q7--fP65-Da7vPq6XFxczjQXrJ9VmhpFSkFtYxgHXIKyDCg2gnLd1LTQZWk0NoRrq8pKF0LjsjKqJqrRXFOWodfHurvWRznqj5JWAjNclElthpZHwni1kbvgtircSq-cPAR8WEmVlOgWpMAN5qBBsYIVSpiaWENFXdWcpQHSZBn6OHYbmi0YnVYUVDspOr3p3Fqu_LUkGLOkhqQK78YKwf8ZIPZy66KGtlUd-OEweHrJkqeWGXrzD_qwvJFaqaTAddanxnpfVF5UBa0rwasiUfMHqPQZ2Dqd3GJdik8S3k8SEtPDTb9SQ4xy-eP7_7NXv6fs2xN2Dart19G3w95KcQoWR1AHH2MAe79lguXe7HfbkHuzy9HsKe3V6QvdJ925m_0FvBr54Q</recordid><startdate>20230324</startdate><enddate>20230324</enddate><creator>Abonie, Ulric S</creator><creator>Oldenburg, Marloes</creator><creator>van der Woude, Lucas</creator><creator>Hettinga, Florentina J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-334X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2509-4413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-8126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230324</creationdate><title>Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in upper body exercise</title><author>Abonie, Ulric S ; Oldenburg, Marloes ; van der Woude, Lucas ; Hettinga, Florentina J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise intensity</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abonie, Ulric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldenburg, Marloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Woude, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hettinga, Florentina J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abonie, Ulric S</au><au>Oldenburg, Marloes</au><au>van der Woude, Lucas</au><au>Hettinga, Florentina J</au><au>Boullosa, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in upper body exercise</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-03-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0283620</spage><epage>e0283620</epage><pages>e0283620-e0283620</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study examined whether differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) (local; RPEL and central; RPEC) and overall RPE (RPEO) were different between exercise modes (upper- versus lower body) and/or changed after upper body training, providing relevant input for upper body exercise prescription/regulation. Eight rowers completed an incremental cycling test (CY), and incremental handcycle (HC) tests before (HCpre) and after three weeks of handcycle training (HCpost). RPEc was higher during CY (17.4±2.4) compared to HCpost (15.9±1.9). However, RPEo was higher during HCpost (9.1±0.6) compared to CY (8.3±1.1). During the HC tests, RPEL was consistently higher than RPEO at the same PO. Training resulted in higher RPEc (HCpre: 14.6±2.6; HCpost: 15.9±1.9) and RPEo (HCpre: 7.9±0.9; HCpost: 9.1±0.6). No differences were found for RPEL between CY and HCpost (8.7±1.1; 9.3±0.4) and after HC training (HCpre: 9.1±1.0; HCpost: 9.3±0.4). At the point of exhaustion, RPEc was higher in CY than during HCpre and HCpost, suggesting RPEC is not causing exercise termination in HC. Furthermore, RPEL is perceived higher than RPEO during all stages of the incremental HC tests compared to CY. This suggests that in contrast to cycling, local factors during arm work are perceived more strongly than central or overall cues of exertion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36961835</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0283620</doi><tpages>e0283620</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-334X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2509-4413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-8126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0283620-e0283620
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2790304519
source PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Carbon dioxide
Cycles
Evaluation
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise intensity
Exercise Test
Exercise Therapy
Fitness equipment
Heart rate
Heart Rate - physiology
Humans
Medicine and Health Sciences
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Perceptions
Physical Exertion - physiology
Physical fitness
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Ratings
Social Sciences
Training
title Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion in upper body exercise
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiated%20ratings%20of%20perceived%20exertion%20in%20upper%20body%20exercise&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Abonie,%20Ulric%20S&rft.date=2023-03-24&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0283620&rft.epage=e0283620&rft.pages=e0283620-e0283620&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0283620&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA742879674%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-7c2da1592fbd36e05eaf3e20d926cb824c55dc0d16cfa57c49c057da81abc6c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2790304519&rft_id=info:pmid/36961835&rft_galeid=A742879674&rfr_iscdi=true