Working from home and subsequent work outcomes: Pre-pandemic evidence

• Published in: PloS one 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0283788-e0283788
• Main Authors: Chen, Ying, Weziak-Bialowolska, Dorota, Lee, Matthew T, Bialowolski, Piotr, Cowden, Richard G, McNeely, Eileen, VanderWeele, Tyler J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Commuting; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Employee turnover; Evaluation; Family Conflict; Humans; Job Satisfaction; Medicine and Health Sciences; Observational studies; Pandemics; Physical Sciences; Productivity; Regression analysis; Regression models; Research and Analysis Methods; Social Sciences; Telecommuting; Work life balance; Workers; Working hours
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283788

Frequent working from home (WFH) may stay as a new work norm after the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior observational studies on WFH and work outcomes under non-pandemic circumstances are mostly cross-sectional and often studied employees who worked from home in limited capacity. To provide additional insights that might inform post-pandemic work policies, using longitudinal data collected before the COVID-19 pandemic (June 2018 to July 2019), this study aims to examine the associations between WFH and multiple subsequent work-related outcomes, as well as potential modifiers of these associations, in a sample of employees among whom frequent or even full-time WFH was common (N = 1,123, Meanage = 43.37 years). In linear regression models, each subsequent work outcome (standardized score was used) was regressed on frequencies of WFH, adjusting for baseline values of the outcome variables and other covariates. The results suggested that WFH for 5 days/week versus never WFH was associated with subsequently less work distraction (ß = -0.24, 95% CI = -0.38, -0.11), greater perceived productivity/engagement (ß = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.36), and greater job satisfaction (ß = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02, 0.27), and was associated with subsequent work-family conflicts to a lesser extent (ß = -0.13, 95% CI = -0.26, 0.004). There was also evidence suggesting that long work hours, caregiving responsibilities, and a greater sense of meaningful work can all potentially attenuate the benefits of WFH. As we move towards the post-pandemic era, further research will be needed to understand the impacts of WFH and resources for supporting employees who work from home.