Existential suffering as a motive for assisted suicide: Difficulties, acceptability, management and roles from the perspectives of Swiss professionals

• Published in: PloS one 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284698-e0284698
• Main Authors: Gaignard, Marie-Estelle, Pautex, Sophie, Hurst, Samia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acceptability; Anesthesia; Assisted suicide; Biology and Life Sciences; End of life; Evaluation; Humans; Laws, regulations and rules; Medical care; Medical personnel; Medicine and Health Sciences; Motivation; Palliation; Palliative care; Palliative Care - methods; Palliative treatment; Patients; People and Places; Primary care; Qualitative research; Quality management; Right to die; Social Sciences; Stress, Psychological - psychology; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted - psychology; Switzerland; Terminal Care - psychology
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284698

Existential suffering is often a part of the requests for assisted suicide (AS). Its definitions have gained in clarity recently and refer to a distress arising from an inner realization that life has lost its meaning. There is however a lack of consensus on how to manage existential suffering, especially in a country where AS is legal and little is known about the difficulties faced by professionals confronted with these situations. To explore the perspectives of Swiss professionals involved in end-of-life care and AS on the management of existential suffering when it is part of AS requests, taking into account the question of roles, as well as on the difficulties they encounter along the way and their views on the acceptability of existential suffering as a motive for AS. A qualitative study based on face-to-face interviews was performed among twenty-five participants from the fields of palliative and primary care as well as from EXIT right-to-die organization. A semi-structured interview guide exploring four themes was used. Elements from the grounded theory approach were applied. Almost all participants reported experiencing difficulties when facing existential suffering. Opinions regarding the acceptability of existential suffering in accessing AS were divided. Concerning its management, participants referred to the notion of being present, showing respect, seeking to understand the causes of suffering, helping give meaning, working together, psychological support, spiritual support, relieving physical symptoms and palliative sedation. This study offers a unique opportunity to reflect on what are desirable responses to existential suffering when it is part of AS requests. Existential suffering is plural and implies a multiplicity of responses as well. These situations remain however difficult and controversial according to Swiss professionals. Clinicians' education should further address these issues and give professionals the tools to better take care of these people.