Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence

• Published in: PloS one 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0285885-e0285885
• Main Authors: Orsolini, Lilian Rodrigues, Goldberg, Tamara Beres Lederer, Caldeirão, Talita Domingues, Cristiane da Silva, Carla, Rizzo, Anapaula da Conceição Bisi, Biason, Talita Poli, Teixeira, Altamir Santos, Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adolescence; Adolescent; Adolescents; Age groups; Alkaline phosphatase; Analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomarkers; Birth control; Body mass index; Body measurements; Bone and Bones; Bone densitometry; Bone Density; Bone mass; Bone mineral content; Bone turnover; Bones; Child development; Clinical trials; Condoms; Contraceptives; Contraceptives, Oral, Combined; Control Groups; Densitometry; Density; Dosage and administration; Drospirenone; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Engineering and Technology; Ethinyl Estradiol; Ethinylestradiol; Female; Girls; Health aspects; Humans; Immunoassay; Medicine and Health Sciences; Metabolism; Methods; Oral contraceptives; Osteocalcin; Participation; People and Places; Phosphatases; Physiological aspects; Puberty; Teenagers; Variance analysis; Youth
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285885

Data regarding the use and effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mass acquisition during adolescence are contradictory. The present study was designed to evaluate bone metabolism in two groups of healthy adolescents using combined oral contraceptives (COC). A total of 168 adolescents were recruited from 2014 to 2020 in a non-randomized clinical trial and divided into three groups. The COC1 group used 20 μg Ethinylestradiol (EE)/150 μg Desogestrel and the COC2 group used 30 μg EE/3 mg Drospirenone over a period of two years. These groups were compared to a control group of adolescent non-COC users. The adolescents were submitted to bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measurement of bone biomarkers, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and osteocalcin (OC) at baseline and 24 months after inclusion in the study. The three groups studied were compared at the different time points by ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Incorporation of bone mass was greater in non-users at all sites analyzed (4.85 g in lumbar Bone mineral content (BMC)) when compared to adolescents of the COC1 and COC2 groups, with a respective increase of 2.15 g and loss of 0.43g in lumbar BMC (P = 0.001). When comparing subtotal BMC, the control increased 100.83 g, COC 1 increased 21.46 g, and COC 2 presented a reduction of 1.47 g (P = 0.005). The values of bone markers after 24 months are similar for BAP, being 30.51 U/L (± 11.6) for the control group, 34.95 U/L (± 10.8) for COC1, and 30.29 U/L for COC 2 (± 11.5) (P = 0.377). However, when we analyzed OC, we observed for control, COC 1, and COC 2 groups, respectively, 13.59 ng/mL (± 7.3), 6.44 ng/mL (± 4.6), and 9.48 ng/mL (± 5.9), with P = 0.003. Despite loss to follow-up occurring in the three groups, there were no significant differences between the variables in adolescents at baseline who remained in the study during the 24-month follow-up and those who were excluded or lost to follow-up. Bone mass acquisition was compromised in healthy adolescents using combined hormonal contraceptives when compared to controls. This negative impact seems to be more pronounced in the group that used contraceptives containing 30 μg EE. http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br, RBR-5h9b3c. "Low-dose combined oral contraceptive use is associated with lower bone mass in adolescents".