Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures

• Published in: PloS one 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0284320-e0284320
• Main Authors: Berk, Till, Thalmann, Marion, Jensen, Kai Oliver, Schwarzenberg, Peter, Jukema, Gerrolt Nico, Pape, Hans-Christoph, Halvachizadeh, Sascha
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged patients; Bacterial pneumonia; Blood transfusions; Care and treatment; Cohort analysis; Complications; Delirium; Dementia disorders; Diagnosis; Falls (Accidents); Femur; Fractures; Geriatric assessment; Geriatric nursing; Geriatrics; Health risks; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Malnutrition; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medicine, Experimental; Mental disorders; Methods; Nursing; Nursing care; Nutrition; Nutrition assessment; Older people; Patients; Pneumonia; Population; Prevention; Product/Service Evaluations; Risk; Risk assessment; Risk factors; Services; Surgery; Trauma; Urogenital system
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284320

Geriatric trauma patients represent a special challenge in postoperative care and are prone to specific complications. The goal of this study was to analyse the predictive potential of a novel nursing assessment tool, the outcome-oriented nursing assessment for acute care (ePA-AC), in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures (PFF). A retrospective cohort study of geriatric trauma patients aged ≥ 70 years with PFF was conducted at a level 1 trauma centre. The ePA-AC is a routinely used tool that evaluates pneumonia; confusion, delirium and dementia (CDD); decubitus (Braden Score); the risk of falls; the Fried Frailty index (FFI); and nutrition. Assessment of the novel tool included analysis of its ability to predict complications including delirium, pneumonia and decubitus. The novel ePA-AC tool was investigated in 71 geriatric trauma patients. In total, 49 patients (67.7%) developed at least one complication. The most common complication was delirium (n = 22, 44.9%). The group with complications (Group C) had a significantly higher FFI compared with the group without complications (Group NC) (1.7 ± 0.5 vs 1.2 ± 0.4, p = 0.002). Group C had a significantly higher risk score for malnutrition compared with Group NC (6.3 ± 3.4 vs 3.9 ± 2.8, p = 0.004). A higher FFI score increased the risk of developing complications (odds ratio [OR] 9.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 47.7, p = 0.005). A higher CDD score increased the risk of developing delirium (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.9 to 29.4, p < 0.001). The FFI, CDD, and nutritional assessment tools are associated with the development of complications in geriatric trauma patients with PFF. These tools can support the identification of geriatric patients at risk and might guide individualised treatment strategies and preventive measures.