Loading…
USA vs Russia in the scientific arena
This work contrasts the scientific standing of the USA and Russia in 146 scientific disciplines. We consider four dimensions of competitive positioning: the contribution to global scientific advancement, the researchers' productivity, the scientific specialization indexes, and the efficiency in...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0288152-e0288152 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-183f6cded6ded33fe12b429921626c635c3b08f7dec4958450d70fe93689c7843 |
container_end_page | e0288152 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0288152 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Abramo, Giovanni D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea Di Costa, Flavia |
description | This work contrasts the scientific standing of the USA and Russia in 146 scientific disciplines. We consider four dimensions of competitive positioning: the contribution to global scientific advancement, the researchers' productivity, the scientific specialization indexes, and the efficiency in resource allocation across disciplines. Differently from previous literature, we use discipline-normalized output to input indicators, thus avoiding distortions due to different intensities of publication across disciplines. Results show that the USA outperforms Russia in contribution to world scholarly impact in all but four disciplines, and is more productive in all but two disciplines. The USA is less efficient in allocating resources to the disciplines where it performs better, probably due to its higher research diversification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0288152 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2833945837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A756090056</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_df3cc4f6a90d43569a6e955291696495</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A756090056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-183f6cded6ded33fe12b429921626c635c3b08f7dec4958450d70fe93689c7843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshrGxXSSTdKyvqxHKPgKFQrvuViiylCg4VirZZfv3UxK3xKMXwwgb6Tnv8avzFsVrjKYYOP68Dn1sdTPdhtZOERECU_KkOMUSyIQRBE-Pvk-KFymtEaIgGHtenACvMOKMnBbvb65n5V0qr_qUvC59W3YrWybjbdt5502po231y-KZ002yr4b3WXHz7evP8x-Ti8vv8_PZxcSwinQTLMAxU9ua5QXgLCaLikhJMCPMMKAGFkg4XltTSSoqimqOnJXAhDRcVHBWvD3obpuQ1OAwKSIAZEUF8EzMD0Qd9Fpto9_o-EcF7dV-I8Sl0rHzprGqdmBM5ZiWqK6AMqmZlZQSiZlkuX_W-jJ06xcbW5tsOepmJDo-af1KLcOdwggIRRyywsdBIYbb3qZObXwytml0a0O__3FKOIG9tXf_oI_bG6ilzg5860JubHaiasYpQzLPkGVq-giVn9puvMl5cD7vjwo-jQoy09nf3VLnqav59dX_s5e_xuyHI3ZlddOtUmj6zoc2jcHqAJoYUorWPdwyRmoX5_vbULs4qyHOuezN8YQeiu7zC38Bd3TriQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833945837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>USA vs Russia in the scientific arena</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Abramo, Giovanni ; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ; Di Costa, Flavia</creator><contributor>Damásio, Bruno Miguel Pinto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Abramo, Giovanni ; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ; Di Costa, Flavia ; Damásio, Bruno Miguel Pinto</creatorcontrib><description>This work contrasts the scientific standing of the USA and Russia in 146 scientific disciplines. We consider four dimensions of competitive positioning: the contribution to global scientific advancement, the researchers' productivity, the scientific specialization indexes, and the efficiency in resource allocation across disciplines. Differently from previous literature, we use discipline-normalized output to input indicators, thus avoiding distortions due to different intensities of publication across disciplines. Results show that the USA outperforms Russia in contribution to world scholarly impact in all but four disciplines, and is more productive in all but two disciplines. The USA is less efficient in allocating resources to the disciplines where it performs better, probably due to its higher research diversification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288152</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37410762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Author productivity ; Bibliometrics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Datasets ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Efficiency ; Engineering and Technology ; Forecasts and trends ; Knowledge ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Resource allocation ; Science ; Social Sciences ; Specialization ; Trade restrictions ; War</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0288152-e0288152</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Abramo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Abramo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Abramo et al 2023 Abramo et al</rights><rights>2023 Abramo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-183f6cded6ded33fe12b429921626c635c3b08f7dec4958450d70fe93689c7843</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0731-3635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2833945837?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2833945837?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37410762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Damásio, Bruno Miguel Pinto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Abramo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Costa, Flavia</creatorcontrib><title>USA vs Russia in the scientific arena</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This work contrasts the scientific standing of the USA and Russia in 146 scientific disciplines. We consider four dimensions of competitive positioning: the contribution to global scientific advancement, the researchers' productivity, the scientific specialization indexes, and the efficiency in resource allocation across disciplines. Differently from previous literature, we use discipline-normalized output to input indicators, thus avoiding distortions due to different intensities of publication across disciplines. Results show that the USA outperforms Russia in contribution to world scholarly impact in all but four disciplines, and is more productive in all but two disciplines. The USA is less efficient in allocating resources to the disciplines where it performs better, probably due to its higher research diversification.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Trade restrictions</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshrGxXSSTdKyvqxHKPgKFQrvuViiylCg4VirZZfv3UxK3xKMXwwgb6Tnv8avzFsVrjKYYOP68Dn1sdTPdhtZOERECU_KkOMUSyIQRBE-Pvk-KFymtEaIgGHtenACvMOKMnBbvb65n5V0qr_qUvC59W3YrWybjbdt5502po231y-KZ002yr4b3WXHz7evP8x-Ti8vv8_PZxcSwinQTLMAxU9ua5QXgLCaLikhJMCPMMKAGFkg4XltTSSoqimqOnJXAhDRcVHBWvD3obpuQ1OAwKSIAZEUF8EzMD0Qd9Fpto9_o-EcF7dV-I8Sl0rHzprGqdmBM5ZiWqK6AMqmZlZQSiZlkuX_W-jJ06xcbW5tsOepmJDo-af1KLcOdwggIRRyywsdBIYbb3qZObXwytml0a0O__3FKOIG9tXf_oI_bG6ilzg5860JubHaiasYpQzLPkGVq-giVn9puvMl5cD7vjwo-jQoy09nf3VLnqav59dX_s5e_xuyHI3ZlddOtUmj6zoc2jcHqAJoYUorWPdwyRmoX5_vbULs4qyHOuezN8YQeiu7zC38Bd3TriQ</recordid><startdate>20230706</startdate><enddate>20230706</enddate><creator>Abramo, Giovanni</creator><creator>D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea</creator><creator>Di Costa, Flavia</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-3635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230706</creationdate><title>USA vs Russia in the scientific arena</title><author>Abramo, Giovanni ; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ; Di Costa, Flavia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-183f6cded6ded33fe12b429921626c635c3b08f7dec4958450d70fe93689c7843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Trade restrictions</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abramo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Costa, Flavia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abramo, Giovanni</au><au>D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea</au><au>Di Costa, Flavia</au><au>Damásio, Bruno Miguel Pinto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>USA vs Russia in the scientific arena</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-07-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0288152</spage><epage>e0288152</epage><pages>e0288152-e0288152</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This work contrasts the scientific standing of the USA and Russia in 146 scientific disciplines. We consider four dimensions of competitive positioning: the contribution to global scientific advancement, the researchers' productivity, the scientific specialization indexes, and the efficiency in resource allocation across disciplines. Differently from previous literature, we use discipline-normalized output to input indicators, thus avoiding distortions due to different intensities of publication across disciplines. Results show that the USA outperforms Russia in contribution to world scholarly impact in all but four disciplines, and is more productive in all but two disciplines. The USA is less efficient in allocating resources to the disciplines where it performs better, probably due to its higher research diversification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37410762</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0288152</doi><tpages>e0288152</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-3635</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0288152-e0288152 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2833945837 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Algorithms Author productivity Bibliometrics Biology and Life Sciences Datasets Ecology and Environmental Sciences Efficiency Engineering and Technology Forecasts and trends Knowledge Medicine and Health Sciences People and Places Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Resource allocation Science Social Sciences Specialization Trade restrictions War |
title | USA vs Russia in the scientific arena |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T01%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=USA%20vs%20Russia%20in%20the%20scientific%20arena&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Abramo,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2023-07-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0288152&rft.epage=e0288152&rft.pages=e0288152-e0288152&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0288152&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA756090056%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-183f6cded6ded33fe12b429921626c635c3b08f7dec4958450d70fe93689c7843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833945837&rft_id=info:pmid/37410762&rft_galeid=A756090056&rfr_iscdi=true |