Loading…
Paying attention to cardiac surgical risk: An interpretable machine learning approach using an uncertainty-aware attentive neural network
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery. Commonly used ML models fail to translate to clinical practice due to absent model explainability, limited uncertainty quantification, and no flexibility to missing data. We aimed to develop a...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0289930-e0289930 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-4627840a0343d0cfdae51df43b9b26460a502ae39cc7511d788c0ac60a0cd1263 |
container_end_page | e0289930 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0289930 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Penny-Dimri, Jahan C Bergmeir, Christoph Reid, Christopher M Williams-Spence, Jenni Cochrane, Andrew D Smith, Julian A |
description | Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery. Commonly used ML models fail to translate to clinical practice due to absent model explainability, limited uncertainty quantification, and no flexibility to missing data. We aimed to develop and benchmark a novel ML approach, the uncertainty-aware attention network (UAN), to overcome these common limitations. Two Bayesian uncertainty quantification methods were tested, generalized variational inference (GVI) or a posterior network (PN). The UAN models were compared with an ensemble of XGBoost models and a Bayesian logistic regression model (LR) with imputation. The derivation datasets consisted of 153,932 surgery events from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) Cardiac Surgery Database. An external validation consisted of 7343 surgery events which were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III critical care dataset. The highest performing model on the external validation dataset was a UAN-GVI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 (0.01). Model performance improved on high confidence samples with an AUC of 0.81 (0.01). Confidence calibration for aleatoric uncertainty was excellent for all models. Calibration for epistemic uncertainty was more variable, with an ensemble of XGBoost models performing the best with an AUC of 0.84 (0.08). Epistemic uncertainty was improved using the PN approach, compared to GVI. UAN is able to use an interpretable and flexible deep learning approach to provide estimates of model uncertainty alongside state-of-the-art predictions. The model has been made freely available as an easy-to-use web application demonstrating that by designing uncertainty-aware models with innately explainable predictions deep learning may become more suitable for routine clinical use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0289930 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2858950130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A762819872</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_252e1402ff084724ba6be8da30456c7c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A762819872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-4627840a0343d0cfdae51df43b9b26460a502ae39cc7511d788c0ac60a0cd1263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEEsvCGyARCQnBRYsPieNwg6oVh0orLeJ0a02dSetuandtZ5c-Am-N22bRBu0FykXiyTf_-B_NZNlzSqaUV_Tt2vXeQjfdOotTwmRdc_IgO6E1ZxPBCH945_tx9iSENSEll0KcZL-_wM7YZQ4xoo3G2Ty6XINvDOg89H5pNHS5N-HyXT6zubER_dZjhEWH-Qb0yljMOwRvDyrbrXcpmPfhcLR5bzX6CClvN4Eb8Hhb6Rpzi71P4hbjjfOXT7NHLXQBnw3v0-zHxw_fzz5Pzi8-zc9m5xMtaB0nhWCVLAgQXvCG6LYBLGnTFnxRL5goBIGSMEBea12VlDaVlJqATnGiG8oEP81eHHW3nQtqaF1QTJayLgnlJBHzI9E4WKutNxvwO-XAqEPA-aUCH43uULGSIS0Ia1sii4oVCxALlA1wUpRCVzppvR-q9YsNNjpZT55HouM_1qzU0l0rSgohSVElhdeDgndXPYaoNiZo7Dqw6PrDxWtBeCn31l7-g95vb6CWkBwY27pUWO9F1awSTNJaVixR03uo9DS4MToNWmtSfJTwZpSQmIi_4hL6ENT829f_Zy9-jtlXd9gVQhdXwXX9fljDGCyOoPYuBI_t3y5TovZ7ctsNtd8TNewJ_wOJugew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858950130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paying attention to cardiac surgical risk: An interpretable machine learning approach using an uncertainty-aware attentive neural network</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C ; Bergmeir, Christoph ; Reid, Christopher M ; Williams-Spence, Jenni ; Cochrane, Andrew D ; Smith, Julian A</creator><contributor>Tong, Guangyu</contributor><creatorcontrib>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C ; Bergmeir, Christoph ; Reid, Christopher M ; Williams-Spence, Jenni ; Cochrane, Andrew D ; Smith, Julian A ; Tong, Guangyu</creatorcontrib><description>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery. Commonly used ML models fail to translate to clinical practice due to absent model explainability, limited uncertainty quantification, and no flexibility to missing data. We aimed to develop and benchmark a novel ML approach, the uncertainty-aware attention network (UAN), to overcome these common limitations. Two Bayesian uncertainty quantification methods were tested, generalized variational inference (GVI) or a posterior network (PN). The UAN models were compared with an ensemble of XGBoost models and a Bayesian logistic regression model (LR) with imputation. The derivation datasets consisted of 153,932 surgery events from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) Cardiac Surgery Database. An external validation consisted of 7343 surgery events which were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III critical care dataset. The highest performing model on the external validation dataset was a UAN-GVI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 (0.01). Model performance improved on high confidence samples with an AUC of 0.81 (0.01). Confidence calibration for aleatoric uncertainty was excellent for all models. Calibration for epistemic uncertainty was more variable, with an ensemble of XGBoost models performing the best with an AUC of 0.84 (0.08). Epistemic uncertainty was improved using the PN approach, compared to GVI. UAN is able to use an interpretable and flexible deep learning approach to provide estimates of model uncertainty alongside state-of-the-art predictions. The model has been made freely available as an easy-to-use web application demonstrating that by designing uncertainty-aware models with innately explainable predictions deep learning may become more suitable for routine clinical use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289930</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Applications programs ; Bayesian analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Calibration ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Datasets ; Decision trees ; Deep learning ; Epistemology ; Generalized linear models ; Health risks ; Heart ; Heart surgery ; Intensive care ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Missing data ; Modelling ; Mortality ; Neural networks ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Surgery ; Thoracic surgery ; Thorax ; Uncertainty ; Variables</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0289930-e0289930</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Penny-Dimri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Penny-Dimri et al 2023 Penny-Dimri et al</rights><rights>2023 Penny-Dimri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-4627840a0343d0cfdae51df43b9b26460a502ae39cc7511d788c0ac60a0cd1263</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8148-1237 ; 0000-0003-1244-4277</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2858950130/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2858950130?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Tong, Guangyu</contributor><creatorcontrib>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmeir, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams-Spence, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochrane, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Julian A</creatorcontrib><title>Paying attention to cardiac surgical risk: An interpretable machine learning approach using an uncertainty-aware attentive neural network</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery. Commonly used ML models fail to translate to clinical practice due to absent model explainability, limited uncertainty quantification, and no flexibility to missing data. We aimed to develop and benchmark a novel ML approach, the uncertainty-aware attention network (UAN), to overcome these common limitations. Two Bayesian uncertainty quantification methods were tested, generalized variational inference (GVI) or a posterior network (PN). The UAN models were compared with an ensemble of XGBoost models and a Bayesian logistic regression model (LR) with imputation. The derivation datasets consisted of 153,932 surgery events from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) Cardiac Surgery Database. An external validation consisted of 7343 surgery events which were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III critical care dataset. The highest performing model on the external validation dataset was a UAN-GVI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 (0.01). Model performance improved on high confidence samples with an AUC of 0.81 (0.01). Confidence calibration for aleatoric uncertainty was excellent for all models. Calibration for epistemic uncertainty was more variable, with an ensemble of XGBoost models performing the best with an AUC of 0.84 (0.08). Epistemic uncertainty was improved using the PN approach, compared to GVI. UAN is able to use an interpretable and flexible deep learning approach to provide estimates of model uncertainty alongside state-of-the-art predictions. The model has been made freely available as an easy-to-use web application demonstrating that by designing uncertainty-aware models with innately explainable predictions deep learning may become more suitable for routine clinical use.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEEsvCGyARCQnBRYsPieNwg6oVh0orLeJ0a02dSetuandtZ5c-Am-N22bRBu0FykXiyTf_-B_NZNlzSqaUV_Tt2vXeQjfdOotTwmRdc_IgO6E1ZxPBCH945_tx9iSENSEll0KcZL-_wM7YZQ4xoo3G2Ty6XINvDOg89H5pNHS5N-HyXT6zubER_dZjhEWH-Qb0yljMOwRvDyrbrXcpmPfhcLR5bzX6CClvN4Eb8Hhb6Rpzi71P4hbjjfOXT7NHLXQBnw3v0-zHxw_fzz5Pzi8-zc9m5xMtaB0nhWCVLAgQXvCG6LYBLGnTFnxRL5goBIGSMEBea12VlDaVlJqATnGiG8oEP81eHHW3nQtqaF1QTJayLgnlJBHzI9E4WKutNxvwO-XAqEPA-aUCH43uULGSIS0Ia1sii4oVCxALlA1wUpRCVzppvR-q9YsNNjpZT55HouM_1qzU0l0rSgohSVElhdeDgndXPYaoNiZo7Dqw6PrDxWtBeCn31l7-g95vb6CWkBwY27pUWO9F1awSTNJaVixR03uo9DS4MToNWmtSfJTwZpSQmIi_4hL6ENT829f_Zy9-jtlXd9gVQhdXwXX9fljDGCyOoPYuBI_t3y5TovZ7ctsNtd8TNewJ_wOJugew</recordid><startdate>20230830</startdate><enddate>20230830</enddate><creator>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C</creator><creator>Bergmeir, Christoph</creator><creator>Reid, Christopher M</creator><creator>Williams-Spence, Jenni</creator><creator>Cochrane, Andrew D</creator><creator>Smith, Julian A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-1237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-4277</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230830</creationdate><title>Paying attention to cardiac surgical risk: An interpretable machine learning approach using an uncertainty-aware attentive neural network</title><author>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C ; Bergmeir, Christoph ; Reid, Christopher M ; Williams-Spence, Jenni ; Cochrane, Andrew D ; Smith, Julian A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-4627840a0343d0cfdae51df43b9b26460a502ae39cc7511d788c0ac60a0cd1263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmeir, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams-Spence, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochrane, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Julian A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agricultural & Environmental Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penny-Dimri, Jahan C</au><au>Bergmeir, Christoph</au><au>Reid, Christopher M</au><au>Williams-Spence, Jenni</au><au>Cochrane, Andrew D</au><au>Smith, Julian A</au><au>Tong, Guangyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paying attention to cardiac surgical risk: An interpretable machine learning approach using an uncertainty-aware attentive neural network</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-08-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0289930</spage><epage>e0289930</epage><pages>e0289930-e0289930</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery. Commonly used ML models fail to translate to clinical practice due to absent model explainability, limited uncertainty quantification, and no flexibility to missing data. We aimed to develop and benchmark a novel ML approach, the uncertainty-aware attention network (UAN), to overcome these common limitations. Two Bayesian uncertainty quantification methods were tested, generalized variational inference (GVI) or a posterior network (PN). The UAN models were compared with an ensemble of XGBoost models and a Bayesian logistic regression model (LR) with imputation. The derivation datasets consisted of 153,932 surgery events from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) Cardiac Surgery Database. An external validation consisted of 7343 surgery events which were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III critical care dataset. The highest performing model on the external validation dataset was a UAN-GVI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 (0.01). Model performance improved on high confidence samples with an AUC of 0.81 (0.01). Confidence calibration for aleatoric uncertainty was excellent for all models. Calibration for epistemic uncertainty was more variable, with an ensemble of XGBoost models performing the best with an AUC of 0.84 (0.08). Epistemic uncertainty was improved using the PN approach, compared to GVI. UAN is able to use an interpretable and flexible deep learning approach to provide estimates of model uncertainty alongside state-of-the-art predictions. The model has been made freely available as an easy-to-use web application demonstrating that by designing uncertainty-aware models with innately explainable predictions deep learning may become more suitable for routine clinical use.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0289930</doi><tpages>e0289930</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-1237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-4277</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0289930-e0289930 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2858950130 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Analysis Applications programs Bayesian analysis Biology and Life Sciences Calibration Computer and Information Sciences Datasets Decision trees Deep learning Epistemology Generalized linear models Health risks Heart Heart surgery Intensive care Learning algorithms Machine learning Mathematical models Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Missing data Modelling Mortality Neural networks Regression analysis Regression models Surgery Thoracic surgery Thorax Uncertainty Variables |
title | Paying attention to cardiac surgical risk: An interpretable machine learning approach using an uncertainty-aware attentive neural network |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A41%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paying%20attention%20to%20cardiac%20surgical%20risk:%20An%20interpretable%20machine%20learning%20approach%20using%20an%20uncertainty-aware%20attentive%20neural%20network&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Penny-Dimri,%20Jahan%20C&rft.date=2023-08-30&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0289930&rft.epage=e0289930&rft.pages=e0289930-e0289930&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0289930&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA762819872%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-4627840a0343d0cfdae51df43b9b26460a502ae39cc7511d788c0ac60a0cd1263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858950130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A762819872&rfr_iscdi=true |