Orthodontics social media, perceptions of science- and non-science-based posts among orthodontists, dentists, students and laypeople

• Published in: PloS one 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0286927-e0286927
• Main Authors: Gasparello, Gil Guilherme, Mota-Júnior, Sergio Luiz, Hartmann, Giovani Ceron, Berlesi, Augusto Hideki, Acciaris, Fábio, Berretta, Letícia Machado, Pithon, Matheus Melo, Tanaka, Orlando
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Biology and Life Sciences; Computer and Information Sciences; Data collection; Dental students; Dentistry; Dentists; Digital media; Ethnicity; Evaluation; Internet; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methods; Online social networks; Orthodontics; Questionnaires; Social networks; Social Sciences; Software; Statistical analysis; Students; Tagging; Technology application; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286927

Worldwide, social media is gaining popularity year after year. In Brazil, by 2027, there will be more than 188 million users of social media sites, against 165 million in 2022, therefore, the usage of general population and health care professionals, including orthodontists, is increasing. Differently from scientific journals that undergo a rigorous peer review process prior to publication, the same level of demand is not found on social media. Hence, this study aimed to assess whether orthodontists can recognize scientifically based and non-science-based posts and if their perceptions are different from general opinion (laypeople), dentistry students, and dentists (non-orthodontists). The posts were created using the search tool on Instagram with the hashtags #clearaligners #acceledent #selfligatingbraces and #propelorthodontics, four scientific based posts and four without or with low scientific evidence were selected and evaluated through a virtual questionnaire in the QUALTRICS platform by 385 people, (175 laypeople, 102 dentists, 58 dentistry students, and 50 orthodontists) using a visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, four questions were asked. ANOVA (Adjusted Bonferroni correction) and Pearson's chi-squared, and Student T tests were applied to identify statistical differences. Significant difference was found only for posts with no scientific evidence between orthodontist's group when comparing with laypeople (p < 0.001) for the #selfligatingbraces, and the #propelorthodontics for the group orthodontists when compared with laypeople (p = 0.031) and dentists (p = 0.033). Instagram was the favorite social media where most of the participants spend more than 3 h. Of the participants, 97% used social media to keep informed and read the news. Almost half of the respondents search for orthodontics services on social media. Orthodontists were able to perceive differences in only two posts from the general perception (laypeople) regarding non- or low-scientific-evidence posts.