The quantity and composition of household food waste: Implications for policy

Studies on food waste in Southeast Asia are currently limited, with a notable absence of comparative analyses investigating the volume and composition of food waste in urban and rural areas through direct measurement. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the quantity, composition, and driv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0305087
Main Authors: Martianto, Drajat, Diana, Rian, Baliwati, Yayuk Farida, Sukandar, Dadang, Hendriadi, Agung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Beverages
Biology and Life Sciences
Cereals
Comparative analysis
Composition
Cross-Sectional Studies
Earth Sciences
Family Characteristics
Food
Food composition
Food Loss and Waste
Food spoilage
Food waste
Garbage
Household wastes
Households
Humans
Indonesia
Medicine and Health Sciences
Per capita
Refuse and refuse disposal
Research and Analysis Methods
Rural areas
Rural Population
Shelf life
Social Sciences
Spoilage
Urban areas
Urban Population
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0305087
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Martianto, Drajat
Diana, Rian
Baliwati, Yayuk Farida
Sukandar, Dadang
Hendriadi, Agung
description Studies on food waste in Southeast Asia are currently limited, with a notable absence of comparative analyses investigating the volume and composition of food waste in urban and rural areas through direct measurement. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste between urban and rural areas. Household food waste was assessed through waste compositional analysis for food and diaries for beverages. This cross-sectional study included 215 households in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Comparisons between the two areas were performed using an independent t-test. The average of household food waste in Bogor Regency was 77 kg/cap/year (edible 37.7%, inedible 62.3%). Household food waste was higher in urban areas (79.4 kg/cap/year) than in rural areas (45.8 kg/cap/year) (p
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0305087
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069265532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A797496371</galeid><sourcerecordid>A797496371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g461t-399131876e33ce4db933dd71ac628e4615285b7284b6d76e94a8722317bc00863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluL1DAUx4so7kW_gWhBWPRhxlzaXHyRZfEysLKgq68hTdJpljTpNqk6396MVpnKPkgekpPzO_8T_idF8QSCNcQUvroJ0-ilWw_BmzXAoAaM3iuOIcdoRRDA9w_OR8VJjDcA1JgR8rA4woyROoscFx-vO1PeTtInm3al9LpUoR9CtMkGX4a27MIUTRecLtsQdPldxmRel5t-cFbJPRRzYiyHkOPdo-JBK100j-f9tPjy7u31xYfV5dX7zcX55WpbEZhWmHOIIaPEYKxMpRuOsdYUSkUQMxmpEasbiljVEJ0pXklGEcKQNgoARvBp8ey37uBCFLMTUWBAOCJ1jVEm3szE1PRGK-PTKJ0YRtvLcSeCtGKZ8bYT2_BNQAhJNodnhRezwhhuJxOT6G1UxjnpTfZk34xyWAMCMvr8H_TuJ83UVjojrG9Dbqz2ouKcclpxkieSqfUdVF7a9FblWbc23y8KXi4KMpPMj7SVU4xi8_nT_7NXX5fs2QHbGelSF4Obfs18CT49tPqvx38-Gf4JEfDQsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069265532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quantity and composition of household food waste: Implications for policy</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Martianto, Drajat ; Diana, Rian ; Baliwati, Yayuk Farida ; Sukandar, Dadang ; Hendriadi, Agung</creator><creatorcontrib>Martianto, Drajat ; Diana, Rian ; Baliwati, Yayuk Farida ; Sukandar, Dadang ; Hendriadi, Agung</creatorcontrib><description>Studies on food waste in Southeast Asia are currently limited, with a notable absence of comparative analyses investigating the volume and composition of food waste in urban and rural areas through direct measurement. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste between urban and rural areas. Household food waste was assessed through waste compositional analysis for food and diaries for beverages. This cross-sectional study included 215 households in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Comparisons between the two areas were performed using an independent t-test. The average of household food waste in Bogor Regency was 77 kg/cap/year (edible 37.7%, inedible 62.3%). Household food waste was higher in urban areas (79.4 kg/cap/year) than in rural areas (45.8 kg/cap/year) (p&lt;0.001). Cereals, tubers and their derivatives (especially rice) and vegetables were the major contributors to edible food waste, whereas fruits were the main contributors to inedible food waste in both areas. Food waste drivers were spoilage/staleness/moldiness, changes in texture, short shelf life, cooking too much, and plate leftovers. Households in urban areas had a higher quantity of food waste and disposed of more edible food than those in rural areas. Meanwhile, the drivers of food waste generation were similar in both areas. Understanding the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste is pivotal for developing effective awareness campaigns and fostering behavioral changes to prevent household food waste.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38865371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Beverages ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cereals ; Comparative analysis ; Composition ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Earth Sciences ; Family Characteristics ; Food ; Food composition ; Food Loss and Waste ; Food spoilage ; Food waste ; Garbage ; Household wastes ; Households ; Humans ; Indonesia ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Per capita ; Refuse and refuse disposal ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rural areas ; Rural Population ; Shelf life ; Social Sciences ; Spoilage ; Urban areas ; Urban Population</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0305087</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Martianto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Martianto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Martianto et al 2024 Martianto et al</rights><rights>2024 Martianto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9708-2449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3069265532/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3069265532?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38865371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martianto, Drajat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Rian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baliwati, Yayuk Farida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukandar, Dadang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriadi, Agung</creatorcontrib><title>The quantity and composition of household food waste: Implications for policy</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Studies on food waste in Southeast Asia are currently limited, with a notable absence of comparative analyses investigating the volume and composition of food waste in urban and rural areas through direct measurement. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste between urban and rural areas. Household food waste was assessed through waste compositional analysis for food and diaries for beverages. This cross-sectional study included 215 households in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Comparisons between the two areas were performed using an independent t-test. The average of household food waste in Bogor Regency was 77 kg/cap/year (edible 37.7%, inedible 62.3%). Household food waste was higher in urban areas (79.4 kg/cap/year) than in rural areas (45.8 kg/cap/year) (p&lt;0.001). Cereals, tubers and their derivatives (especially rice) and vegetables were the major contributors to edible food waste, whereas fruits were the main contributors to inedible food waste in both areas. Food waste drivers were spoilage/staleness/moldiness, changes in texture, short shelf life, cooking too much, and plate leftovers. Households in urban areas had a higher quantity of food waste and disposed of more edible food than those in rural areas. Meanwhile, the drivers of food waste generation were similar in both areas. Understanding the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste is pivotal for developing effective awareness campaigns and fostering behavioral changes to prevent household food waste.</description><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cereals</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food composition</subject><subject>Food Loss and Waste</subject><subject>Food spoilage</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Garbage</subject><subject>Household wastes</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Refuse and refuse disposal</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Shelf life</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Spoilage</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluL1DAUx4so7kW_gWhBWPRhxlzaXHyRZfEysLKgq68hTdJpljTpNqk6396MVpnKPkgekpPzO_8T_idF8QSCNcQUvroJ0-ilWw_BmzXAoAaM3iuOIcdoRRDA9w_OR8VJjDcA1JgR8rA4woyROoscFx-vO1PeTtInm3al9LpUoR9CtMkGX4a27MIUTRecLtsQdPldxmRel5t-cFbJPRRzYiyHkOPdo-JBK100j-f9tPjy7u31xYfV5dX7zcX55WpbEZhWmHOIIaPEYKxMpRuOsdYUSkUQMxmpEasbiljVEJ0pXklGEcKQNgoARvBp8ey37uBCFLMTUWBAOCJ1jVEm3szE1PRGK-PTKJ0YRtvLcSeCtGKZ8bYT2_BNQAhJNodnhRezwhhuJxOT6G1UxjnpTfZk34xyWAMCMvr8H_TuJ83UVjojrG9Dbqz2ouKcclpxkieSqfUdVF7a9FblWbc23y8KXi4KMpPMj7SVU4xi8_nT_7NXX5fs2QHbGelSF4Obfs18CT49tPqvx38-Gf4JEfDQsA</recordid><startdate>20240612</startdate><enddate>20240612</enddate><creator>Martianto, Drajat</creator><creator>Diana, Rian</creator><creator>Baliwati, Yayuk Farida</creator><creator>Sukandar, Dadang</creator><creator>Hendriadi, Agung</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-2449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240612</creationdate><title>The quantity and composition of household food waste: Implications for policy</title><author>Martianto, Drajat ; Diana, Rian ; Baliwati, Yayuk Farida ; Sukandar, Dadang ; Hendriadi, Agung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g461t-399131876e33ce4db933dd71ac628e4615285b7284b6d76e94a8722317bc00863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cereals</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food composition</topic><topic>Food Loss and Waste</topic><topic>Food spoilage</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Garbage</topic><topic>Household wastes</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Refuse and refuse disposal</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Shelf life</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Spoilage</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martianto, Drajat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Rian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baliwati, Yayuk Farida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukandar, Dadang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriadi, Agung</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martianto, Drajat</au><au>Diana, Rian</au><au>Baliwati, Yayuk Farida</au><au>Sukandar, Dadang</au><au>Hendriadi, Agung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quantity and composition of household food waste: Implications for policy</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-06-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0305087</spage><pages>e0305087-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Studies on food waste in Southeast Asia are currently limited, with a notable absence of comparative analyses investigating the volume and composition of food waste in urban and rural areas through direct measurement. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste between urban and rural areas. Household food waste was assessed through waste compositional analysis for food and diaries for beverages. This cross-sectional study included 215 households in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Comparisons between the two areas were performed using an independent t-test. The average of household food waste in Bogor Regency was 77 kg/cap/year (edible 37.7%, inedible 62.3%). Household food waste was higher in urban areas (79.4 kg/cap/year) than in rural areas (45.8 kg/cap/year) (p&lt;0.001). Cereals, tubers and their derivatives (especially rice) and vegetables were the major contributors to edible food waste, whereas fruits were the main contributors to inedible food waste in both areas. Food waste drivers were spoilage/staleness/moldiness, changes in texture, short shelf life, cooking too much, and plate leftovers. Households in urban areas had a higher quantity of food waste and disposed of more edible food than those in rural areas. Meanwhile, the drivers of food waste generation were similar in both areas. Understanding the quantity, composition, and drivers of household food waste is pivotal for developing effective awareness campaigns and fostering behavioral changes to prevent household food waste.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38865371</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0305087</doi><tpages>e0305087</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-2449</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0305087
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3069265532
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Beverages
Biology and Life Sciences
Cereals
Comparative analysis
Composition
Cross-Sectional Studies
Earth Sciences
Family Characteristics
Food
Food composition
Food Loss and Waste
Food spoilage
Food waste
Garbage
Household wastes
Households
Humans
Indonesia
Medicine and Health Sciences
Per capita
Refuse and refuse disposal
Research and Analysis Methods
Rural areas
Rural Population
Shelf life
Social Sciences
Spoilage
Urban areas
Urban Population
title The quantity and composition of household food waste: Implications for policy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A20%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quantity%20and%20composition%20of%20household%20food%20waste:%20Implications%20for%20policy&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Martianto,%20Drajat&rft.date=2024-06-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0305087&rft.pages=e0305087-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0305087&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA797496371%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g461t-399131876e33ce4db933dd71ac628e4615285b7284b6d76e94a8722317bc00863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069265532&rft_id=info:pmid/38865371&rft_galeid=A797496371&rfr_iscdi=true