Exploring barriers and facilitators of implementing an at-home SARS-CoV-2 antigen self-testing intervention: The Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Populations (RADx-UP) initiatives

• Published in: PloS one 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0294458-e0294458
• Main Authors: Cross, Lisa Maria, DeFosset, Amelia, Yusuf, Bola, Conserve, Donaldson, Anderson, Rakiah, Carilli, Christina, Kibbe, Warren, Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael, Richmond, Alan, Corbie, Giselle, Dave, Gaurav
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antigens; Autoantigens; Best practice; Community Health Services; Community involvement; Community organizations; Community participation; COVID-19; COVID-19 - diagnosis; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 diagnostic tests; COVID-19 Testing; COVID-19 vaccines; Data collection; Disaster management; Disease transmission; Evaluation; Funding; Health aspects; Health disparities; Humans; Intervention; Medical tests; Methods; Pandemics; Public health; Qualitative research; SARS-CoV-2; Self testing; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Sustainable development; Taxonomy; Vulnerable Populations
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294458

Evaluating community-based programs provides value to researchers, funding entities, and community stakeholders involved in program implementation, and can increase program impact and sustainability. To understand factors related to program implementation, we aimed to capture the perspective of community partners engaged in organizing and executing community-engaged programs to distribute COVID-19 at-home tests in underserved communities. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with community-based stakeholders informed by the Outcomes for Implementation Research framework. Findings describe how community-engaged communication and dissemination strategies drove program adoption among grassroots stakeholders. Establishing and sustaining trusted relationships was vital to engaging partners with aligned values and capacity. Respondents characterized the programs as generally feasible and appropriate, and community partners felt capable of delivering the program successfully. However, they also described an increased burden on their workforce and desired more significant support. Respondents recognized the programs' community engagement practices as a critical facilitator of acceptability and impact. Implementation evaluation aims to inform current and future community outreach and engagement efforts with best practices. As we continue to inform and advance community-engaged disaster response practice, a parallel reimagining of public health funding mechanisms and timelines could provide a foundation for trust, collaboration, and community resiliency that endures beyond a given crisis.