Influence of social and physical environmental variation on antipredator behavior in mixed-species parid flocks

• Published in: PloS one 2023-12, Vol.18 (12), p.e0295910-e0295910
• Main Authors: Adams, Colton B, Papeş, Monica, Price, Charles A, Freeberg, Todd M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustics; Alarm behavior; Analysis; Animal behavior; Anti-predator behavior; Background noise; Behavior; Biology and Life Sciences; Birds; Composition; Density; Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Evaluation; Food; Foraging behavior; Forests; Group size; Habitats; Latency; Lidar; Noise levels; Optical radar; Physical Sciences; Playback; Predation; Predation (Biology); Remote sensing; Risk perception; Social behavior; Social Sciences; Transportation noise; Vegetation; Vegetation effects
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295910

Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) and tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor) regularly form flocks with multiple species through the winter months, including white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis). Earlier studies found that behavior of both chickadees and titmice was sensitive to mixed-species flock composition. Little is known about the influence of background noise level and vegetation density on the antipredator behaviors of individuals within these flocks, however. We tested for the effects of vegetation density, traffic noise, and flock composition (conspecific number, flock diversity, and flock size) on antipredator behavioral responses following an alarm call playback (Study 1) and an owl model presentation (Study 2) at feeders. We recorded background traffic noise and performed lidar scans to quantify vegetation density at each site. After a feeder had been stocked with seed and a flock was present, we recorded calls produced, and we identified flock composition metrics. We coded seed-taking latency, call latency, mob latency, and mob duration following the respective stimulus presentation and tested for effects of flock composition metrics, vegetation density, and background noise on these responses. For the alarm call playback study, flock composition drove behaviors in chickadees and titmice, and vegetation density drove behaviors in chickadees and nuthatches. For the owl model study, conspecific number predicted behavior in chickadees, and mob duration was predicted by nuthatch number. The results reveal individual sensitivity to group composition in anti-predatory and foraging behavior in simulated risky contexts. Additionally, our data suggest that the modality of perceived simulated risk (acoustic vs. visual) and the density of vegetation influence behavior in these groups.