Therapy effect on hand function after home use of a wearable assistive soft-robotic glove supporting grip strength

• Published in: PloS one 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0306713
• Main Authors: Kottink, Anke I R, Nikamp, Corien D M, Bos, Foskea P, Sluis, Corry K van der, Broek, Marieke van den, Onneweer, Bram, Stolwijk-Swüste, Janneke M, Brink, Sander M, Voet, Nicoline B M, Rietman, Johan S, Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Active control; Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Age; Aged; Arm; Biology and Life Sciences; Clinical medicine; Complications and side effects; Diagnosis; Engineering and Technology; Evaluation; Female; Fingers; Gloves; Grip strength; Hand; Hand (anatomy); Hand - physiology; Hand Strength - physiology; Home environment; Human subjects; Humans; Intervention; Male; Medical equipment; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Nervous system diseases; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis; Pilot projects; R&D; Rehabilitation; Research & development; Rheumatoid arthritis; Robot control; Robotics; Robotics - instrumentation; Self-Help Devices; Spinal cord injuries; Stroke; Time measurement; Usability; Wearable Electronic Devices; Wearable technology
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306713

Soft-robotic gloves with an assist-as-needed control have the ability to assist daily activities where needed, while stimulating active and highly functional movements within the user's possibilities. Employment of hand activities with glove support might act as training for unsupported hand function. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of a grip-supporting soft-robotic glove as an assistive device at home during daily activities. This multicentre intervention trial consisted of 3 pre-assessments (averaged if steady state = PRE), one post-assessment (POST), and one follow-up assessment (FU). Participants with chronic hand function limitations were included. Participants used the Carbonhand glove during six weeks in their home environment on their most affected hand. They were free to choose which activities to use the glove with and for how long. The primary outcome measure was grip strength, secondary outcome measures were pinch strength, hand function and glove use time. 63 patients with limitations in hand function resulting from various disorders were included. Significant improvements (difference PRE-POST) were found for grip strength (+1.9 kg, CI 0.8 to 3.1; p = 0.002) and hand function, as measured by Jebson-Taylor Hand Function Test (-7.7 s, CI -13.4 to -1.9; p = 0.002) and Action Research Arm Test (+1.0 point, IQR 2.0; p≤0.001). Improvements persisted at FU. Pinch strength improved slightly in all fingers over six-week glove use, however these differences didn't achieve significance. Participants used the soft-robotic glove for a total average of 33.0 hours (SD 35.3), equivalent to 330 min/week (SD 354) or 47 min/day (SD 51). No serious adverse events occurred. The present findings showed that six weeks use of a grip-supporting soft-robotic glove as an assistive device at home resulted in a therapeutic effect on unsupported grip strength and hand function. The glove use time also showed that this wearable, lightweight glove was able to assist participants with the performance of daily tasks for prolonged periods.