Loading…

Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an effective treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies indicate that the composition of gut microbiota could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following PRISMA guideline...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307639
Main Authors: Ajab, Suad Mohamed, Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan, Labania, Lena Abdulbaset, Östlundh, Linda Mari, Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin, Olanda, Marie Antonette, Alkaabi, Obaid, Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad, Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed, Al Rasbi, Zakeya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-af7fa6b4902f1ed8e0e71b5a7867d5895c3d7e4a3730ad72fee60f9cd45a94d23
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0307639
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Ajab, Suad Mohamed
Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan
Labania, Lena Abdulbaset
Östlundh, Linda Mari
Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin
Olanda, Marie Antonette
Alkaabi, Obaid
Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad
Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed
Al Rasbi, Zakeya
description Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an effective treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies indicate that the composition of gut microbiota could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review was conducted after registering the protocol with PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was carried out across five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to gauge the quality of the studies. A total of 5,132 papers were identified, and three studies and one conference abstract published between 2017-2022 met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in a descriptive synthesis table. These four studies were in accord with the following findings, four main phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroidata, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota were associated with CRC patients' clinical response toward ICIs treatment. Ruminococcaceae was predominantly related to CRC patients responding to therapy, while the Micrococcaceae family was more common among the non-responders. Bacterial taxa such as Faecalibacterium and Prevotellaceae were associated with better responses to ICIs and could be predictive biomarkers. The signature of fecal microbiota with Akkermansia muciniphila and Eubacterium rectale enrichment, and Rothia mucilaginosa depletion could independently predict better response to ICIs in patients with CRC. The findings have brought attention to the notable differences in terms of richness and composition of microbiota between patients who responded positively to the treatment and those who did not. Bacterial species and families, such as Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia sp., Ruminococcaceae, and Prevotellaceae, have consistently surfaced as potential indicators of immunotherapeutic responses. Furthermore, this review also emphasizes the need for additional comprehensive, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes to validate reported microbiota and expand our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in CRC ICIs therapy. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021277691.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0307639
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3084293385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A802452493</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c5f0ae29b6b4de7a23e36075cf387ec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A802452493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-af7fa6b4902f1ed8e0e71b5a7867d5895c3d7e4a3730ad72fee60f9cd45a94d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxE64QdX4qjQ0iY_dWo5z3LpK4mA7G_33uGs2NWgXKBexTp739fEbnyR5jtECU47fbe3gOtksetvBAlHEGS0fJKe4pGTOCKIPj9YnyRPvtwjltGDscXJCS5RxhPlpsv1mlLOVsUGmyra99SYY26WgNaiQxpVp26GzYQNO9rvUDiFi4FPTRb6xLlKySZXsFLi0l8FAF_z7dJn6nQ_QxoJKHVwZuH6aPNKy8fBsfM-SX58__Tz7Oj-_-LI6W57PFcMozKXmWrIqKxHRGOoCEHBc5ZIXjNd5UeaK1hwySTlFsuZEAzCkS1VnuSyzmtBZ8vLg2zfWizEmLygqMlJSWuSRWB2I2sqt6J1ppdsJK424KVi3FtLFxhsQuco1kkDKKrZUA5eEAmWI50rTgoOKXvODl7-Gfqgmbh_N5fLGzbpBYJxTlkX-w9jdULVQqxiXk81ENv3SmY1Y26uoJ6xgOY4Ob0YHZ38P4INojVfQNLIDOxwOyhkryD6KV_-g98cxUmsZT2w6bePGam8qlgUiWU6yCM6SxT1UfGpojYqXUJtYnwjeTgSRCfAnrOXgvVj9-P7_7MXllH19xG5ANmHjbTPs762fgtkBjDfcewf6LmWMxH6GbtMQ-xkS4wxF2YvjP3Qnuh0a-heMURkZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084293385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ajab, Suad Mohamed ; Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan ; Labania, Lena Abdulbaset ; Östlundh, Linda Mari ; Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin ; Olanda, Marie Antonette ; Alkaabi, Obaid ; Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad ; Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed ; Al Rasbi, Zakeya</creator><contributor>Yata, Vinod Kumar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ajab, Suad Mohamed ; Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan ; Labania, Lena Abdulbaset ; Östlundh, Linda Mari ; Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin ; Olanda, Marie Antonette ; Alkaabi, Obaid ; Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad ; Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed ; Al Rasbi, Zakeya ; Yata, Vinod Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an effective treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies indicate that the composition of gut microbiota could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review was conducted after registering the protocol with PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was carried out across five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to gauge the quality of the studies. A total of 5,132 papers were identified, and three studies and one conference abstract published between 2017-2022 met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in a descriptive synthesis table. These four studies were in accord with the following findings, four main phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroidata, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota were associated with CRC patients' clinical response toward ICIs treatment. Ruminococcaceae was predominantly related to CRC patients responding to therapy, while the Micrococcaceae family was more common among the non-responders. Bacterial taxa such as Faecalibacterium and Prevotellaceae were associated with better responses to ICIs and could be predictive biomarkers. The signature of fecal microbiota with Akkermansia muciniphila and Eubacterium rectale enrichment, and Rothia mucilaginosa depletion could independently predict better response to ICIs in patients with CRC. The findings have brought attention to the notable differences in terms of richness and composition of microbiota between patients who responded positively to the treatment and those who did not. Bacterial species and families, such as Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia sp., Ruminococcaceae, and Prevotellaceae, have consistently surfaced as potential indicators of immunotherapeutic responses. Furthermore, this review also emphasizes the need for additional comprehensive, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes to validate reported microbiota and expand our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in CRC ICIs therapy. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021277691.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307639</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39047017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Cell death ; Clinical trials ; Cohort analysis ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - microbiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Composition effects ; Cytotoxicity ; Effectiveness ; Faecalibacterium ; Fecal microflora ; Feces - microbiology ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Immune system ; Immunotherapy ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Inhibitors ; Intestinal microflora ; Literature reviews ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Microorganisms ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Prevotellaceae ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ruminococcaceae ; Systematic review ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307639</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Ajab et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Ajab et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Ajab et al 2024 Ajab et al</rights><rights>2024 Ajab et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-af7fa6b4902f1ed8e0e71b5a7867d5895c3d7e4a3730ad72fee60f9cd45a94d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9909-8658 ; 0000-0002-9981-173X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084293385/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084293385?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39047017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-115364$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Yata, Vinod Kumar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ajab, Suad Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labania, Lena Abdulbaset</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Östlundh, Linda Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olanda, Marie Antonette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkaabi, Obaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Rasbi, Zakeya</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an effective treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies indicate that the composition of gut microbiota could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review was conducted after registering the protocol with PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was carried out across five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to gauge the quality of the studies. A total of 5,132 papers were identified, and three studies and one conference abstract published between 2017-2022 met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in a descriptive synthesis table. These four studies were in accord with the following findings, four main phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroidata, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota were associated with CRC patients' clinical response toward ICIs treatment. Ruminococcaceae was predominantly related to CRC patients responding to therapy, while the Micrococcaceae family was more common among the non-responders. Bacterial taxa such as Faecalibacterium and Prevotellaceae were associated with better responses to ICIs and could be predictive biomarkers. The signature of fecal microbiota with Akkermansia muciniphila and Eubacterium rectale enrichment, and Rothia mucilaginosa depletion could independently predict better response to ICIs in patients with CRC. The findings have brought attention to the notable differences in terms of richness and composition of microbiota between patients who responded positively to the treatment and those who did not. Bacterial species and families, such as Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia sp., Ruminococcaceae, and Prevotellaceae, have consistently surfaced as potential indicators of immunotherapeutic responses. Furthermore, this review also emphasizes the need for additional comprehensive, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes to validate reported microbiota and expand our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in CRC ICIs therapy. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021277691.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - microbiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Faecalibacterium</subject><subject>Fecal microflora</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prevotellaceae</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ruminococcaceae</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxE64QdX4qjQ0iY_dWo5z3LpK4mA7G_33uGs2NWgXKBexTp739fEbnyR5jtECU47fbe3gOtksetvBAlHEGS0fJKe4pGTOCKIPj9YnyRPvtwjltGDscXJCS5RxhPlpsv1mlLOVsUGmyra99SYY26WgNaiQxpVp26GzYQNO9rvUDiFi4FPTRb6xLlKySZXsFLi0l8FAF_z7dJn6nQ_QxoJKHVwZuH6aPNKy8fBsfM-SX58__Tz7Oj-_-LI6W57PFcMozKXmWrIqKxHRGOoCEHBc5ZIXjNd5UeaK1hwySTlFsuZEAzCkS1VnuSyzmtBZ8vLg2zfWizEmLygqMlJSWuSRWB2I2sqt6J1ppdsJK424KVi3FtLFxhsQuco1kkDKKrZUA5eEAmWI50rTgoOKXvODl7-Gfqgmbh_N5fLGzbpBYJxTlkX-w9jdULVQqxiXk81ENv3SmY1Y26uoJ6xgOY4Ob0YHZ38P4INojVfQNLIDOxwOyhkryD6KV_-g98cxUmsZT2w6bePGam8qlgUiWU6yCM6SxT1UfGpojYqXUJtYnwjeTgSRCfAnrOXgvVj9-P7_7MXllH19xG5ANmHjbTPs762fgtkBjDfcewf6LmWMxH6GbtMQ-xkS4wxF2YvjP3Qnuh0a-heMURkZ</recordid><startdate>20240724</startdate><enddate>20240724</enddate><creator>Ajab, Suad Mohamed</creator><creator>Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan</creator><creator>Labania, Lena Abdulbaset</creator><creator>Östlundh, Linda Mari</creator><creator>Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin</creator><creator>Olanda, Marie Antonette</creator><creator>Alkaabi, Obaid</creator><creator>Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad</creator><creator>Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed</creator><creator>Al Rasbi, Zakeya</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>AABEP</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D91</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-8658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-173X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240724</creationdate><title>Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review</title><author>Ajab, Suad Mohamed ; Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan ; Labania, Lena Abdulbaset ; Östlundh, Linda Mari ; Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin ; Olanda, Marie Antonette ; Alkaabi, Obaid ; Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad ; Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed ; Al Rasbi, Zakeya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-af7fa6b4902f1ed8e0e71b5a7867d5895c3d7e4a3730ad72fee60f9cd45a94d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - microbiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Faecalibacterium</topic><topic>Fecal microflora</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prevotellaceae</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ruminococcaceae</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ajab, Suad Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labania, Lena Abdulbaset</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Östlundh, Linda Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olanda, Marie Antonette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkaabi, Obaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Rasbi, Zakeya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ajab, Suad Mohamed</au><au>Zoughbor, Sumaya Hasan</au><au>Labania, Lena Abdulbaset</au><au>Östlundh, Linda Mari</au><au>Orsud, Hiba Salaheldin</au><au>Olanda, Marie Antonette</au><au>Alkaabi, Obaid</au><au>Alkuwaiti, Shamma Hamad</au><au>Alnuaimi, Shaikha Mohammed</au><au>Al Rasbi, Zakeya</au><au>Yata, Vinod Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-07-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0307639</spage><pages>e0307639-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as an effective treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies indicate that the composition of gut microbiota could potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review was conducted after registering the protocol with PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was carried out across five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to gauge the quality of the studies. A total of 5,132 papers were identified, and three studies and one conference abstract published between 2017-2022 met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in a descriptive synthesis table. These four studies were in accord with the following findings, four main phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroidata, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota were associated with CRC patients' clinical response toward ICIs treatment. Ruminococcaceae was predominantly related to CRC patients responding to therapy, while the Micrococcaceae family was more common among the non-responders. Bacterial taxa such as Faecalibacterium and Prevotellaceae were associated with better responses to ICIs and could be predictive biomarkers. The signature of fecal microbiota with Akkermansia muciniphila and Eubacterium rectale enrichment, and Rothia mucilaginosa depletion could independently predict better response to ICIs in patients with CRC. The findings have brought attention to the notable differences in terms of richness and composition of microbiota between patients who responded positively to the treatment and those who did not. Bacterial species and families, such as Faecalibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia sp., Ruminococcaceae, and Prevotellaceae, have consistently surfaced as potential indicators of immunotherapeutic responses. Furthermore, this review also emphasizes the need for additional comprehensive, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes to validate reported microbiota and expand our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in CRC ICIs therapy. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021277691.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39047017</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0307639</doi><tpages>e0307639</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-8658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-173X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307639
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3084293385
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Biomarkers
Cancer
Cancer patients
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Cell death
Clinical trials
Cohort analysis
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology
Colorectal Neoplasms - microbiology
Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy
Composition effects
Cytotoxicity
Effectiveness
Faecalibacterium
Fecal microflora
Feces - microbiology
Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects
Humans
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Immune system
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy - methods
Inhibitors
Intestinal microflora
Literature reviews
Medicine and Health Sciences
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Microorganisms
Monoclonal antibodies
Oncology, Experimental
Patient outcomes
Patients
Prevotellaceae
Research and Analysis Methods
Ruminococcaceae
Systematic review
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title Microbiota composition effect on immunotherapy outcomes in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A14%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiota%20composition%20effect%20on%20immunotherapy%20outcomes%20in%20colorectal%20cancer%20patients:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ajab,%20Suad%20Mohamed&rft.date=2024-07-24&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0307639&rft.pages=e0307639-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0307639&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA802452493%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-af7fa6b4902f1ed8e0e71b5a7867d5895c3d7e4a3730ad72fee60f9cd45a94d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084293385&rft_id=info:pmid/39047017&rft_galeid=A802452493&rfr_iscdi=true