Loading…
Age and familiarity effects on musical memory
A common complaint in older adults is trouble with their memory, especially for new information. Current knowledge about normal aging and changes in memory identify a divide between memory tasks that are unaffected by aging and those that are. Among the unaffected are recognition tasks. These memory...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0305969 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-1895f74a895eb856579693ba8786fa9214aa87c2f8dbf8fcd82799a04de40eb23 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0305969 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Sauvé, Sarah A Satkunarajah, Praveena Cooke, Stephen Demirkaplan, Özgen Follett, Alicia Zendel, Benjamin Rich |
description | A common complaint in older adults is trouble with their memory, especially for new information. Current knowledge about normal aging and changes in memory identify a divide between memory tasks that are unaffected by aging and those that are. Among the unaffected are recognition tasks. These memory tasks rely on accessing well-known information, often include environmental support, and tend to be automatic. Negative age effects on memory are often observed at both encoding and during recall. Older adults often have difficulty with recall tasks, particularly those that require effortful self-initiated processing, episodic memory, and retention of information about contextual cues. Research in memory for music in healthy aging suggests a skill-invariance hypothesis: that age effects dominate when general-purpose cognitive mechanisms are needed to perform the musical task at hand, while experience effects dominate when music-specific knowledge is needed to perform the task [1].
The goals of this pair of studies were to investigate the effects of age and familiarity on musical memory in the context of real pieces of music, and to compare a live concert experimental setting with a lab-based experimental setting.
Participants' task was to click a button (or press the spacebar) when they heard the target theme in three pieces of music. One was Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik and the others were original pieces commissioned for this study, one tonal and one atonal. Participants heard the relevant theme three times before listening to a piece of music. The music was performed by the Newfoundland Symphony Orchestra; participants either attended the concert, or watched a recording of the concert in the lab. Participants also completed two short cognitive tests and filled out a questionnaire collecting demographic information and a hearing abilities self-assessment.
We find a significant effect of familiarity and setting but not of age or musical training on recognition performance as measured by d'. More specifically, performance is best for the familiar, tonal piece, moderate for the unfamiliar tonal piece and worst for the unfamiliar atonal piece. Performance was better in the live setting than the lab setting.
The absence of an age effect provides encouraging evidence that music's diverse cues may encourage cognitive scaffolding, in turn improving encoding and subsequent recognition. Better performance in an ecological versus lab setting supports the expansion of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0305969 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3084293459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A802452524</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_41366bb4a22c4b7884e80edbe1185118</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A802452524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-1895f74a895eb856579693ba8786fa9214aa87c2f8dbf8fcd82799a04de40eb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlueiXD4sfAwoJftyFNT2YypM2atOL8ezNOd5nKXkgIOSTPeU9O8hbFc4yWmFb43S6Msdd-eRN6WCKKeC3qB8U5rilZCILow5P4rHiS0g4hTqUQj4szWiMmao7Oi8VqA6Xu29Lqznmnoxv2JVgLZkhl6MtuTM5oX3bQhbh_Wjyy2id4Nq0XxfePH75dfl5cXX9aX66uFoZXZFhgWXNbMZ0XaCQXvMp3o42WlRRW1wQznWNDrGwbK61pJanqWiPWAkPQEHpRvDzq3viQ1NRpUhRJRmrKeJ2J9ZFog96pm-g6HfcqaKf-boS4UToOznhQDFMhmoZpQgxrKikZSARtAxhLnmfWej9VG5sOWgP9ELWfic5PerdVm_BLYUyErBDLCm8mhRh-jpAG1blkwHvdQxiPF68El-TQ2qt_0Pvbm6iNzh243oZc2BxE1Uoiwjjh5FB2eQ-VRwudM9kX1uX9WcLbWUJmBvg9bPSYklp__fL_7PWPOfv6hN2C9sM2BT8OLvRpDrIjaGJIKYK9e2WM1MHWt6-hDrZWk61z2ovTH7pLuvUx_QN9Lu9z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084293459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age and familiarity effects on musical memory</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sauvé, Sarah A ; Satkunarajah, Praveena ; Cooke, Stephen ; Demirkaplan, Özgen ; Follett, Alicia ; Zendel, Benjamin Rich</creator><contributor>Torun, Sukru</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sauvé, Sarah A ; Satkunarajah, Praveena ; Cooke, Stephen ; Demirkaplan, Özgen ; Follett, Alicia ; Zendel, Benjamin Rich ; Torun, Sukru</creatorcontrib><description>A common complaint in older adults is trouble with their memory, especially for new information. Current knowledge about normal aging and changes in memory identify a divide between memory tasks that are unaffected by aging and those that are. Among the unaffected are recognition tasks. These memory tasks rely on accessing well-known information, often include environmental support, and tend to be automatic. Negative age effects on memory are often observed at both encoding and during recall. Older adults often have difficulty with recall tasks, particularly those that require effortful self-initiated processing, episodic memory, and retention of information about contextual cues. Research in memory for music in healthy aging suggests a skill-invariance hypothesis: that age effects dominate when general-purpose cognitive mechanisms are needed to perform the musical task at hand, while experience effects dominate when music-specific knowledge is needed to perform the task [1].
The goals of this pair of studies were to investigate the effects of age and familiarity on musical memory in the context of real pieces of music, and to compare a live concert experimental setting with a lab-based experimental setting.
Participants' task was to click a button (or press the spacebar) when they heard the target theme in three pieces of music. One was Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik and the others were original pieces commissioned for this study, one tonal and one atonal. Participants heard the relevant theme three times before listening to a piece of music. The music was performed by the Newfoundland Symphony Orchestra; participants either attended the concert, or watched a recording of the concert in the lab. Participants also completed two short cognitive tests and filled out a questionnaire collecting demographic information and a hearing abilities self-assessment.
We find a significant effect of familiarity and setting but not of age or musical training on recognition performance as measured by d'. More specifically, performance is best for the familiar, tonal piece, moderate for the unfamiliar tonal piece and worst for the unfamiliar atonal piece. Performance was better in the live setting than the lab setting.
The absence of an age effect provides encouraging evidence that music's diverse cues may encourage cognitive scaffolding, in turn improving encoding and subsequent recognition. Better performance in an ecological versus lab setting supports the expansion of ecological studies in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305969</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39046950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging - physiology ; Aging - psychology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Coding ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Concert reviews ; Concerts ; Ecological studies ; Engineering and Technology ; Familiarity ; Female ; Gerontology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Knowledge ; Listening ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Memory tasks ; Mental task performance ; Middle Aged ; Music ; Music - psychology ; Musical performances ; Musicians & conductors ; Older people ; Orchestras ; People and Places ; Recall ; Recognition ; Recognition, Psychology - physiology ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Scaffolding ; Self assessment ; Semantics ; Skills ; Social Sciences ; Tonality ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0305969</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Sauvé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Sauvé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Sauvé et al 2024 Sauvé et al</rights><rights>2024 Sauvé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-1895f74a895eb856579693ba8786fa9214aa87c2f8dbf8fcd82799a04de40eb23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1194-0113 ; 0000-0003-0880-2916</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084293459/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084293459?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39046950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Torun, Sukru</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sauvé, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satkunarajah, Praveena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkaplan, Özgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follett, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zendel, Benjamin Rich</creatorcontrib><title>Age and familiarity effects on musical memory</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A common complaint in older adults is trouble with their memory, especially for new information. Current knowledge about normal aging and changes in memory identify a divide between memory tasks that are unaffected by aging and those that are. Among the unaffected are recognition tasks. These memory tasks rely on accessing well-known information, often include environmental support, and tend to be automatic. Negative age effects on memory are often observed at both encoding and during recall. Older adults often have difficulty with recall tasks, particularly those that require effortful self-initiated processing, episodic memory, and retention of information about contextual cues. Research in memory for music in healthy aging suggests a skill-invariance hypothesis: that age effects dominate when general-purpose cognitive mechanisms are needed to perform the musical task at hand, while experience effects dominate when music-specific knowledge is needed to perform the task [1].
The goals of this pair of studies were to investigate the effects of age and familiarity on musical memory in the context of real pieces of music, and to compare a live concert experimental setting with a lab-based experimental setting.
Participants' task was to click a button (or press the spacebar) when they heard the target theme in three pieces of music. One was Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik and the others were original pieces commissioned for this study, one tonal and one atonal. Participants heard the relevant theme three times before listening to a piece of music. The music was performed by the Newfoundland Symphony Orchestra; participants either attended the concert, or watched a recording of the concert in the lab. Participants also completed two short cognitive tests and filled out a questionnaire collecting demographic information and a hearing abilities self-assessment.
We find a significant effect of familiarity and setting but not of age or musical training on recognition performance as measured by d'. More specifically, performance is best for the familiar, tonal piece, moderate for the unfamiliar tonal piece and worst for the unfamiliar atonal piece. Performance was better in the live setting than the lab setting.
The absence of an age effect provides encouraging evidence that music's diverse cues may encourage cognitive scaffolding, in turn improving encoding and subsequent recognition. Better performance in an ecological versus lab setting supports the expansion of ecological studies in the field.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Aging - psychology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Concert reviews</subject><subject>Concerts</subject><subject>Ecological studies</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Memory tasks</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music - psychology</subject><subject>Musical performances</subject><subject>Musicians & conductors</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Orchestras</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Scaffolding</subject><subject>Self assessment</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Tonality</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlueiXD4sfAwoJftyFNT2YypM2atOL8ezNOd5nKXkgIOSTPeU9O8hbFc4yWmFb43S6Msdd-eRN6WCKKeC3qB8U5rilZCILow5P4rHiS0g4hTqUQj4szWiMmao7Oi8VqA6Xu29Lqznmnoxv2JVgLZkhl6MtuTM5oX3bQhbh_Wjyy2id4Nq0XxfePH75dfl5cXX9aX66uFoZXZFhgWXNbMZ0XaCQXvMp3o42WlRRW1wQznWNDrGwbK61pJanqWiPWAkPQEHpRvDzq3viQ1NRpUhRJRmrKeJ2J9ZFog96pm-g6HfcqaKf-boS4UToOznhQDFMhmoZpQgxrKikZSARtAxhLnmfWej9VG5sOWgP9ELWfic5PerdVm_BLYUyErBDLCm8mhRh-jpAG1blkwHvdQxiPF68El-TQ2qt_0Pvbm6iNzh243oZc2BxE1Uoiwjjh5FB2eQ-VRwudM9kX1uX9WcLbWUJmBvg9bPSYklp__fL_7PWPOfv6hN2C9sM2BT8OLvRpDrIjaGJIKYK9e2WM1MHWt6-hDrZWk61z2ovTH7pLuvUx_QN9Lu9z</recordid><startdate>20240724</startdate><enddate>20240724</enddate><creator>Sauvé, Sarah A</creator><creator>Satkunarajah, Praveena</creator><creator>Cooke, Stephen</creator><creator>Demirkaplan, Özgen</creator><creator>Follett, Alicia</creator><creator>Zendel, Benjamin Rich</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1194-0113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-2916</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240724</creationdate><title>Age and familiarity effects on musical memory</title><author>Sauvé, Sarah A ; Satkunarajah, Praveena ; Cooke, Stephen ; Demirkaplan, Özgen ; Follett, Alicia ; Zendel, Benjamin Rich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-1895f74a895eb856579693ba8786fa9214aa87c2f8dbf8fcd82799a04de40eb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Aging - psychology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Concert reviews</topic><topic>Concerts</topic><topic>Ecological studies</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Memory tasks</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music - psychology</topic><topic>Musical performances</topic><topic>Musicians & conductors</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Orchestras</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Scaffolding</topic><topic>Self assessment</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Tonality</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauvé, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satkunarajah, Praveena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkaplan, Özgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follett, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zendel, Benjamin Rich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauvé, Sarah A</au><au>Satkunarajah, Praveena</au><au>Cooke, Stephen</au><au>Demirkaplan, Özgen</au><au>Follett, Alicia</au><au>Zendel, Benjamin Rich</au><au>Torun, Sukru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age and familiarity effects on musical memory</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-07-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0305969</spage><pages>e0305969-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A common complaint in older adults is trouble with their memory, especially for new information. Current knowledge about normal aging and changes in memory identify a divide between memory tasks that are unaffected by aging and those that are. Among the unaffected are recognition tasks. These memory tasks rely on accessing well-known information, often include environmental support, and tend to be automatic. Negative age effects on memory are often observed at both encoding and during recall. Older adults often have difficulty with recall tasks, particularly those that require effortful self-initiated processing, episodic memory, and retention of information about contextual cues. Research in memory for music in healthy aging suggests a skill-invariance hypothesis: that age effects dominate when general-purpose cognitive mechanisms are needed to perform the musical task at hand, while experience effects dominate when music-specific knowledge is needed to perform the task [1].
The goals of this pair of studies were to investigate the effects of age and familiarity on musical memory in the context of real pieces of music, and to compare a live concert experimental setting with a lab-based experimental setting.
Participants' task was to click a button (or press the spacebar) when they heard the target theme in three pieces of music. One was Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik and the others were original pieces commissioned for this study, one tonal and one atonal. Participants heard the relevant theme three times before listening to a piece of music. The music was performed by the Newfoundland Symphony Orchestra; participants either attended the concert, or watched a recording of the concert in the lab. Participants also completed two short cognitive tests and filled out a questionnaire collecting demographic information and a hearing abilities self-assessment.
We find a significant effect of familiarity and setting but not of age or musical training on recognition performance as measured by d'. More specifically, performance is best for the familiar, tonal piece, moderate for the unfamiliar tonal piece and worst for the unfamiliar atonal piece. Performance was better in the live setting than the lab setting.
The absence of an age effect provides encouraging evidence that music's diverse cues may encourage cognitive scaffolding, in turn improving encoding and subsequent recognition. Better performance in an ecological versus lab setting supports the expansion of ecological studies in the field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39046950</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0305969</doi><tpages>e0305969</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1194-0113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-2916</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0305969 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3084293459 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Adults Age Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Aging - physiology Aging - psychology Auditory Perception - physiology Biology and Life Sciences Coding Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability Computer and Information Sciences Concert reviews Concerts Ecological studies Engineering and Technology Familiarity Female Gerontology Humans Information processing Knowledge Listening Male Memory Memory - physiology Memory tasks Mental task performance Middle Aged Music Music - psychology Musical performances Musicians & conductors Older people Orchestras People and Places Recall Recognition Recognition, Psychology - physiology Research and Analysis Methods Scaffolding Self assessment Semantics Skills Social Sciences Tonality Young Adult |
title | Age and familiarity effects on musical memory |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A58%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age%20and%20familiarity%20effects%20on%20musical%20memory&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sauv%C3%A9,%20Sarah%20A&rft.date=2024-07-24&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0305969&rft.pages=e0305969-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0305969&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA802452524%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-1895f74a895eb856579693ba8786fa9214aa87c2f8dbf8fcd82799a04de40eb23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084293459&rft_id=info:pmid/39046950&rft_galeid=A802452524&rfr_iscdi=true |