Arthropod community composition in urban landscapes is shaped by both environmental filtering and dispersal limitation

We assessed the relative importance of environmental filtering and dispersal limitation in structuring foliage- and ground-dwelling arthropod communities in central North Carolina. We hypothesized that differences in both local environment and dispersal distance between sites would predict differenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0297507
Main Authors: Roper-Edwards, Indigo R, Hurlbert, Allen H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Arthropoda
Arthropods
Arthropods - physiology
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Cities
Community
Community composition
Composition
Computer and Information Sciences
Dispersal
Earth Sciences
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Environmental conditions
Ethanol
Filtration
Foliage
Leaves
North Carolina
Relative abundance
Social Sciences
Taxonomy
Urban environments
Urbanization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We assessed the relative importance of environmental filtering and dispersal limitation in structuring foliage- and ground-dwelling arthropod communities in central North Carolina. We hypothesized that differences in both local environment and dispersal distance between sites would predict differences in community composition, but that dispersal distance would be more important for ground arthropods than for foliage arthropods. We used variance partitioning to quantify the relative explanatory power of differences in the local environment and dispersal distance between sampling plots. For foliage arthropods, the full set of predictors explained 37-39% of the variance in community dissimilarity, while the full set of predictors explained 42-56% of the variance for ground arthropods. Environmental predictors alone consistently explained more variance in community dissimilarity than geographic predictors alone for ground arthropods, but the variance explained by each predictor set alone varied for foliage arthropods depending on the metric of community dissimilarity. Examining communities of multiple arthropod groups across the same spatial gradient highlights the scale-dependence of these processes and illustrates how variation in the environment can alter the relative abundance of specialist and generalist taxa.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0297507