Loading…
Exploring unsupervised feature extraction of IMU-based gait data in stroke rehabilitation using a variational autoencoder
Variational AutoEncoders (VAE) might be utilized to extract relevant information from an IMU-based gait measurement by reducing the sensor data to a low-dimensional representation. The present study explored whether VAEs can reduce IMU-based gait data of people after stroke into a few latent feature...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2024-10, Vol.19 (10), p.e0304558 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-9da21b17129f846b8d9d8b8b4d44060ba6b4a83806e12bf0b6295e01918e7a063 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0304558 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Felius, Richard Punt, Michiel Geerars, Marieke Wouda, Natasja Rutgers, Rins Bruijn, Sjoerd David, Sina van Dieën, Jaap |
description | Variational AutoEncoders (VAE) might be utilized to extract relevant information from an IMU-based gait measurement by reducing the sensor data to a low-dimensional representation. The present study explored whether VAEs can reduce IMU-based gait data of people after stroke into a few latent features with minimal reconstruction error. Additionally, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the latent features in comparison to gait speed, by assessing 1) their reliability; 2) the difference in scores between people after stroke and healthy controls; and 3) their responsiveness during rehabilitation.
We collected test-retest and longitudinal two-minute walk-test data using an IMU from people after stroke in clinical rehabilitation, as well as from a healthy control group. IMU data were segmented into 5-second epochs, which were reduced to 12 latent-feature scores using a VAE. The between-day test-retest reliability of the latent features was assessed using ICC-scores. The differences between the healthy and the stroke group were examined using an independent t-test. Lastly, the responsiveness was determined as the number of individuals who significantly changed during rehabilitation.
In total, 15,381 epochs from 107 people after stroke and 37 healthy controls were collected. The VAE achieved data reconstruction with minimal errors. Five latent features demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Seven latent features were significantly different between groups. We observed changes during rehabilitation for 21 and 20 individuals in latent-feature scores and gait speed, respectively. However, the direction of the change scores of the latent features was ambiguous. Only eleven individuals exhibited changes in both latent-feature scores and gait speed.
VAEs can be used to effectively reduce IMU-based gait assessment to a concise set of latent features. Some latent features had a high test-retest reliability and differed significantly between healthy controls and people after stroke. Further research is needed to determine their clinical applicability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0304558 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3113065152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A811158791</galeid><sourcerecordid>A811158791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-9da21b17129f846b8d9d8b8b4d44060ba6b4a83806e12bf0b6295e01918e7a063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQdRbK1-A9GAIPowazKZZDKPpVRdqBTU-hpuZu7sps5OtvlT2m_vTHcqXemD5CEh-Z0DOfdk2WtGF4xX7NOlS36AfrF1Ay4op6UQ6kl2yGpe5LKg_OmD80H2IoRLSgVXUj7PDnjNpagqfpjdnt5se-ftsCJpCGmL_toGbEmHEJNHgjfRQxOtG4jryPLbRW5gel-BjaSFCMQOJETvfiPxuAZjexvhjk9hcgVyDd7e3UBPIEWHQ-Na9C-zZx30AV_N-1F28fn058nX_Oz8y_Lk-CxvSkFjXrdQMMMqVtSdKqVRbd0qo0zZliWV1IA0JSiuqERWmI4aWdQCKauZwgqo5EfZ253v-M-g59SC5oxxKgUTxUh8mAnvrhKGqDc2NNj3MKBLO5QVpRRiRN_9gz5uOFMr6FHboXNTiJOpPlaMMaGqmo3U4hFqXC1ubDNOtbPj_Z7g455gZOI4nxWkEPTyx_f_Z89_7bPvH7BrhD6ug-vTNLOwD5Y7sPEuBI-d3nq7AX-rGdVTKe_T0FMp9VzKUfZmDi2ZDbZ_Rfct5H8AUUncVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3113065152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring unsupervised feature extraction of IMU-based gait data in stroke rehabilitation using a variational autoencoder</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed</source><creator>Felius, Richard ; Punt, Michiel ; Geerars, Marieke ; Wouda, Natasja ; Rutgers, Rins ; Bruijn, Sjoerd ; David, Sina ; van Dieën, Jaap</creator><contributor>Son, Jongsang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Felius, Richard ; Punt, Michiel ; Geerars, Marieke ; Wouda, Natasja ; Rutgers, Rins ; Bruijn, Sjoerd ; David, Sina ; van Dieën, Jaap ; Son, Jongsang</creatorcontrib><description>Variational AutoEncoders (VAE) might be utilized to extract relevant information from an IMU-based gait measurement by reducing the sensor data to a low-dimensional representation. The present study explored whether VAEs can reduce IMU-based gait data of people after stroke into a few latent features with minimal reconstruction error. Additionally, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the latent features in comparison to gait speed, by assessing 1) their reliability; 2) the difference in scores between people after stroke and healthy controls; and 3) their responsiveness during rehabilitation.
We collected test-retest and longitudinal two-minute walk-test data using an IMU from people after stroke in clinical rehabilitation, as well as from a healthy control group. IMU data were segmented into 5-second epochs, which were reduced to 12 latent-feature scores using a VAE. The between-day test-retest reliability of the latent features was assessed using ICC-scores. The differences between the healthy and the stroke group were examined using an independent t-test. Lastly, the responsiveness was determined as the number of individuals who significantly changed during rehabilitation.
In total, 15,381 epochs from 107 people after stroke and 37 healthy controls were collected. The VAE achieved data reconstruction with minimal errors. Five latent features demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Seven latent features were significantly different between groups. We observed changes during rehabilitation for 21 and 20 individuals in latent-feature scores and gait speed, respectively. However, the direction of the change scores of the latent features was ambiguous. Only eleven individuals exhibited changes in both latent-feature scores and gait speed.
VAEs can be used to effectively reduce IMU-based gait assessment to a concise set of latent features. Some latent features had a high test-retest reliability and differed significantly between healthy controls and people after stroke. Further research is needed to determine their clinical applicability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304558</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39365773</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Care and treatment ; Case-Control Studies ; Data processing ; Electrocardiography ; Error analysis ; Error reduction ; Evaluation ; Feature extraction ; Female ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Information processing ; Male ; Measurement ; Middle Aged ; Reconstruction ; Rehabilitation ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensors ; Stroke ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke patients ; Stroke Rehabilitation - methods ; Velocity ; Walk Test ; Walking ; Walking Speed</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-10, Vol.19 (10), p.e0304558</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Felius et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Felius et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Felius et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-9da21b17129f846b8d9d8b8b4d44060ba6b4a83806e12bf0b6295e01918e7a063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6116-5632 ; 0000-0001-8904-1471 ; 0000-0002-7719-5585</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3113065152/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3113065152?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39365773$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Son, Jongsang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Felius, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geerars, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wouda, Natasja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutgers, Rins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruijn, Sjoerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dieën, Jaap</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring unsupervised feature extraction of IMU-based gait data in stroke rehabilitation using a variational autoencoder</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Variational AutoEncoders (VAE) might be utilized to extract relevant information from an IMU-based gait measurement by reducing the sensor data to a low-dimensional representation. The present study explored whether VAEs can reduce IMU-based gait data of people after stroke into a few latent features with minimal reconstruction error. Additionally, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the latent features in comparison to gait speed, by assessing 1) their reliability; 2) the difference in scores between people after stroke and healthy controls; and 3) their responsiveness during rehabilitation.
We collected test-retest and longitudinal two-minute walk-test data using an IMU from people after stroke in clinical rehabilitation, as well as from a healthy control group. IMU data were segmented into 5-second epochs, which were reduced to 12 latent-feature scores using a VAE. The between-day test-retest reliability of the latent features was assessed using ICC-scores. The differences between the healthy and the stroke group were examined using an independent t-test. Lastly, the responsiveness was determined as the number of individuals who significantly changed during rehabilitation.
In total, 15,381 epochs from 107 people after stroke and 37 healthy controls were collected. The VAE achieved data reconstruction with minimal errors. Five latent features demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Seven latent features were significantly different between groups. We observed changes during rehabilitation for 21 and 20 individuals in latent-feature scores and gait speed, respectively. However, the direction of the change scores of the latent features was ambiguous. Only eleven individuals exhibited changes in both latent-feature scores and gait speed.
VAEs can be used to effectively reduce IMU-based gait assessment to a concise set of latent features. Some latent features had a high test-retest reliability and differed significantly between healthy controls and people after stroke. Further research is needed to determine their clinical applicability.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Error reduction</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke patients</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - methods</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Walk Test</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Walking Speed</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQdRbK1-A9GAIPowazKZZDKPpVRdqBTU-hpuZu7sps5OtvlT2m_vTHcqXemD5CEh-Z0DOfdk2WtGF4xX7NOlS36AfrF1Ay4op6UQ6kl2yGpe5LKg_OmD80H2IoRLSgVXUj7PDnjNpagqfpjdnt5se-ftsCJpCGmL_toGbEmHEJNHgjfRQxOtG4jryPLbRW5gel-BjaSFCMQOJETvfiPxuAZjexvhjk9hcgVyDd7e3UBPIEWHQ-Na9C-zZx30AV_N-1F28fn058nX_Oz8y_Lk-CxvSkFjXrdQMMMqVtSdKqVRbd0qo0zZliWV1IA0JSiuqERWmI4aWdQCKauZwgqo5EfZ253v-M-g59SC5oxxKgUTxUh8mAnvrhKGqDc2NNj3MKBLO5QVpRRiRN_9gz5uOFMr6FHboXNTiJOpPlaMMaGqmo3U4hFqXC1ubDNOtbPj_Z7g455gZOI4nxWkEPTyx_f_Z89_7bPvH7BrhD6ug-vTNLOwD5Y7sPEuBI-d3nq7AX-rGdVTKe_T0FMp9VzKUfZmDi2ZDbZ_Rfct5H8AUUncVg</recordid><startdate>20241004</startdate><enddate>20241004</enddate><creator>Felius, Richard</creator><creator>Punt, Michiel</creator><creator>Geerars, Marieke</creator><creator>Wouda, Natasja</creator><creator>Rutgers, Rins</creator><creator>Bruijn, Sjoerd</creator><creator>David, Sina</creator><creator>van Dieën, Jaap</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-5632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8904-1471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-5585</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241004</creationdate><title>Exploring unsupervised feature extraction of IMU-based gait data in stroke rehabilitation using a variational autoencoder</title><author>Felius, Richard ; Punt, Michiel ; Geerars, Marieke ; Wouda, Natasja ; Rutgers, Rins ; Bruijn, Sjoerd ; David, Sina ; van Dieën, Jaap</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-9da21b17129f846b8d9d8b8b4d44060ba6b4a83806e12bf0b6295e01918e7a063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Error reduction</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke patients</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - methods</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Walk Test</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Walking Speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Felius, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punt, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geerars, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wouda, Natasja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutgers, Rins</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruijn, Sjoerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dieën, Jaap</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Science in Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Felius, Richard</au><au>Punt, Michiel</au><au>Geerars, Marieke</au><au>Wouda, Natasja</au><au>Rutgers, Rins</au><au>Bruijn, Sjoerd</au><au>David, Sina</au><au>van Dieën, Jaap</au><au>Son, Jongsang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring unsupervised feature extraction of IMU-based gait data in stroke rehabilitation using a variational autoencoder</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-10-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0304558</spage><pages>e0304558-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Variational AutoEncoders (VAE) might be utilized to extract relevant information from an IMU-based gait measurement by reducing the sensor data to a low-dimensional representation. The present study explored whether VAEs can reduce IMU-based gait data of people after stroke into a few latent features with minimal reconstruction error. Additionally, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the latent features in comparison to gait speed, by assessing 1) their reliability; 2) the difference in scores between people after stroke and healthy controls; and 3) their responsiveness during rehabilitation.
We collected test-retest and longitudinal two-minute walk-test data using an IMU from people after stroke in clinical rehabilitation, as well as from a healthy control group. IMU data were segmented into 5-second epochs, which were reduced to 12 latent-feature scores using a VAE. The between-day test-retest reliability of the latent features was assessed using ICC-scores. The differences between the healthy and the stroke group were examined using an independent t-test. Lastly, the responsiveness was determined as the number of individuals who significantly changed during rehabilitation.
In total, 15,381 epochs from 107 people after stroke and 37 healthy controls were collected. The VAE achieved data reconstruction with minimal errors. Five latent features demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Seven latent features were significantly different between groups. We observed changes during rehabilitation for 21 and 20 individuals in latent-feature scores and gait speed, respectively. However, the direction of the change scores of the latent features was ambiguous. Only eleven individuals exhibited changes in both latent-feature scores and gait speed.
VAEs can be used to effectively reduce IMU-based gait assessment to a concise set of latent features. Some latent features had a high test-retest reliability and differed significantly between healthy controls and people after stroke. Further research is needed to determine their clinical applicability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39365773</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0304558</doi><tpages>e0304558</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-5632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8904-1471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-5585</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-10, Vol.19 (10), p.e0304558 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3113065152 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed |
subjects | Accelerometers Adult Aged Algorithms Care and treatment Case-Control Studies Data processing Electrocardiography Error analysis Error reduction Evaluation Feature extraction Female Gait Gait - physiology Health aspects Humans Information processing Male Measurement Middle Aged Reconstruction Rehabilitation Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sensors Stroke Stroke - physiopathology Stroke patients Stroke Rehabilitation - methods Velocity Walk Test Walking Walking Speed |
title | Exploring unsupervised feature extraction of IMU-based gait data in stroke rehabilitation using a variational autoencoder |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A20%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20unsupervised%20feature%20extraction%20of%20IMU-based%20gait%20data%20in%20stroke%20rehabilitation%20using%20a%20variational%20autoencoder&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Felius,%20Richard&rft.date=2024-10-04&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0304558&rft.pages=e0304558-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0304558&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA811158791%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-9da21b17129f846b8d9d8b8b4d44060ba6b4a83806e12bf0b6295e01918e7a063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3113065152&rft_id=info:pmid/39365773&rft_galeid=A811158791&rfr_iscdi=true |