Variation between surgeons in reoperation rates following vertical strabismus surgery: Associations with patient and surgeon characteristics and adjustable sutures

• Published in: PloS one 2024-11, Vol.19 (11), p.e0310371
• Main Authors: Leffler, Christopher T, Woock, Alicia, Shinbashi, Meagan, Suggs, Melissa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Beneficiaries; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Cataracts; Clinical outcomes; Datasets; Eye; Female; Gender; Humans; Male; Medical personnel; Medical societies; Medicare; Medicare - statistics & numerical data; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Muscles; Oculomotor Muscles - surgery; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data; Patient outcomes; Patients; People and Places; Physicians; Poverty; Practice; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies; Social Sciences; Strabismus; Strabismus - surgery; Surgeons; Surgeons - statistics & numerical data; Surgery; Suture Techniques - statistics & numerical data; Sutures; Sutures - statistics & numerical data; Transplants & implants; United States; Variation
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310371

To quantify inter-surgeon variation in vertical strabismus surgery reoperation rates, and to explore associations of reoperation rate with practice type and volume, surgical techniques, and patient characteristics. Fee-for-service payments to providers in a national database for Medicare beneficiaries having vertical strabismus surgery between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to identify reoperations in the same calendar year. Predictors of the rate of reoperation for each surgeon were determined by multivariable linear regression. Among 73 surgeons, the reoperation rate for 1-vertical muscle surgery varied from 0.0% to 40.7%. Due to the presence of high-volume surgeons with high reoperation rates, just 11% of surgeons contributed over half of the reoperation events for 1-vertical muscle surgery. Use of adjustable sutures, surgeon gender, and surgical volume were not independently associated with surgeon reoperation rate. Associations of reoperation with patient characteristics, such as age and poverty, were explored. Patient poverty was independently associated with a lower surgeon reoperation rate (p = 0.03). Still, the multivariable model could explain only 14.2% of the variation in surgeon reoperation rate for 1-vertical muscle. Patient-level analyses which ignore inter-surgeon variation will be dominated by the practices of a small number of high-volume, high-reoperation surgeons. There are order-of-magnitude variations in reoperation rates among strabismus surgeons, the cause of which remains largely unexplained.