Loading…

Putting performance bias to the front-lower side of the hole on steep slopes: Differences in strategies and movements between professional and amateur golfers

When playing on an sloped golf course, the ball often misses the hole to the front-lower side, which is also referred to as the "amateur side." This can be attributed to the difficulty in perceiving the green slope and choosing the appropriate launch direction and ball speed, especially fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.e0314820
Main Authors: Hasegawa, Yumiko, Okada, Ayako, Fujii, Keisuke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4870-d29211d4a9b3cf4c80bf6da048f7fe219edc3086689c66e439704ef5cd5a54613
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0314820
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Hasegawa, Yumiko
Okada, Ayako
Fujii, Keisuke
description When playing on an sloped golf course, the ball often misses the hole to the front-lower side, which is also referred to as the "amateur side." This can be attributed to the difficulty in perceiving the green slope and choosing the appropriate launch direction and ball speed, especially for amateurs. The study had three main objectives. The first was to examine whether a front-down bias toward the hole could be experimentally observed in golfers' putting. Second, to measure golfers' aims and movements to determine why golfers, especially amateurs, putt poorly on steep slopes. Third, to investigate using a miniature platform how golfers recognized the steepness of the slopes and the relationship between their aim and their slope recognition. Twelve professionals and twelve intermediate amateurs were asked to perform in the 1- and 3-degree conditions (left-to-right line) at a distance of 3 m from the hole. Participants wore shutter goggles to inhibit visual feedback of outcomes. The aim, address, ball launch direction (analyzed as angles), and kinematics of the putter head and ball were measured. The results of this study experimentally confirmed the amateur side and indicated that the aim, address, and launch directions of the amateurs were smaller than those of the professionals. As for reproducing the slope task, we found that the amateurs underestimated the steepness on both conditions when compared to professionals. Additionally, golfers' aim and slope recognition were weakly correlated. These suggest that amateurs, compared to professionals, were unable to choose the optimal speed of the putter head and the launch direction of the ball in relation to the slope. Furthermore, amateurs' recognition was worse than that of professionals, which may affect their aim.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0314820
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3150493655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821919374</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_15cb917de7fb4eb39af2c768674cc985</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A821919374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4870-d29211d4a9b3cf4c80bf6da048f7fe219edc3086689c66e439704ef5cd5a54613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISG42MWOHSfhBlXltFKlIk63luOMs145cWo7LbwMz4r30GoX9QLlIs74m9_-JzNZ9pTgOaElebNykx-knY9ugDmmhFU5vpcdk5rmM55jen9vfZQ9CmGFcUErzh9mR7QuaV3V_Dj782WK0QwdGsFr53s5KECNkQFFh-ISkPZuiDPrrsGjYFpATm_iS2fTekAhAowoWDdCeIveG63BQxIJyKw3vYzQmfQlhxb17gp6GGJADcRrgAGN3mkIwbjkZIPIPiVMHnXOJqHwOHugpQ3wZPc-yX58_PD97PPs_OLT4uz0fKZYVeJZm9c5IS2TdUOVZqrCjeatxKzSpYac1NAqipP3qlacA0v-MQNdqLaQBeOEnmTPt7qjdUHsShsEJQVmNeVFkYjFlmidXInRm17638JJIzYB5zshfTTKgiCFampStlDqhkFDa6lzVfKKl0ypulprvdudNjV9uloqiZf2QPRwZzBL0bkrQQivymQ4KbzaKXh3OUGIojdBgbVyADdtL17kmG_QF_-gd9vbUZ1MDsygXTpYrUXFaZUKmFqpZIma30Glp4XeqNSI2qT4QcLrg4TERPgVOzmFIBbfvv4_e_HzkH25xy5B2rgMzk4xdVI4BNkWVN6F4EHfVplgsZ6jm2qI9RyJ3RyltGf7f-g26WZw6F8VoRsD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3150493655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting performance bias to the front-lower side of the hole on steep slopes: Differences in strategies and movements between professional and amateur golfers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hasegawa, Yumiko ; Okada, Ayako ; Fujii, Keisuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Yumiko ; Okada, Ayako ; Fujii, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><description>When playing on an sloped golf course, the ball often misses the hole to the front-lower side, which is also referred to as the "amateur side." This can be attributed to the difficulty in perceiving the green slope and choosing the appropriate launch direction and ball speed, especially for amateurs. The study had three main objectives. The first was to examine whether a front-down bias toward the hole could be experimentally observed in golfers' putting. Second, to measure golfers' aims and movements to determine why golfers, especially amateurs, putt poorly on steep slopes. Third, to investigate using a miniature platform how golfers recognized the steepness of the slopes and the relationship between their aim and their slope recognition. Twelve professionals and twelve intermediate amateurs were asked to perform in the 1- and 3-degree conditions (left-to-right line) at a distance of 3 m from the hole. Participants wore shutter goggles to inhibit visual feedback of outcomes. The aim, address, ball launch direction (analyzed as angles), and kinematics of the putter head and ball were measured. The results of this study experimentally confirmed the amateur side and indicated that the aim, address, and launch directions of the amateurs were smaller than those of the professionals. As for reproducing the slope task, we found that the amateurs underestimated the steepness on both conditions when compared to professionals. Additionally, golfers' aim and slope recognition were weakly correlated. These suggest that amateurs, compared to professionals, were unable to choose the optimal speed of the putter head and the launch direction of the ball in relation to the slope. Furthermore, amateurs' recognition was worse than that of professionals, which may affect their aim.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314820</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39739896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amateurs ; Athletic Performance - physiology ; Bias ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Female ; Goggles ; Golf ; Golf courses ; Golfers ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Movement - physiology ; Physical Sciences ; Professionals ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Putting (Golf) ; Recognition ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Slopes ; Social Sciences ; Visual perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.e0314820</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Hasegawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Hasegawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Hasegawa et al 2024 Hasegawa et al</rights><rights>2024 Hasegawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4870-d29211d4a9b3cf4c80bf6da048f7fe219edc3086689c66e439704ef5cd5a54613</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1097-9200</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3150493655/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3150493655?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39739896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><title>Putting performance bias to the front-lower side of the hole on steep slopes: Differences in strategies and movements between professional and amateur golfers</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>When playing on an sloped golf course, the ball often misses the hole to the front-lower side, which is also referred to as the "amateur side." This can be attributed to the difficulty in perceiving the green slope and choosing the appropriate launch direction and ball speed, especially for amateurs. The study had three main objectives. The first was to examine whether a front-down bias toward the hole could be experimentally observed in golfers' putting. Second, to measure golfers' aims and movements to determine why golfers, especially amateurs, putt poorly on steep slopes. Third, to investigate using a miniature platform how golfers recognized the steepness of the slopes and the relationship between their aim and their slope recognition. Twelve professionals and twelve intermediate amateurs were asked to perform in the 1- and 3-degree conditions (left-to-right line) at a distance of 3 m from the hole. Participants wore shutter goggles to inhibit visual feedback of outcomes. The aim, address, ball launch direction (analyzed as angles), and kinematics of the putter head and ball were measured. The results of this study experimentally confirmed the amateur side and indicated that the aim, address, and launch directions of the amateurs were smaller than those of the professionals. As for reproducing the slope task, we found that the amateurs underestimated the steepness on both conditions when compared to professionals. Additionally, golfers' aim and slope recognition were weakly correlated. These suggest that amateurs, compared to professionals, were unable to choose the optimal speed of the putter head and the launch direction of the ball in relation to the slope. Furthermore, amateurs' recognition was worse than that of professionals, which may affect their aim.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amateurs</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goggles</subject><subject>Golf</subject><subject>Golf courses</subject><subject>Golfers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Putting (Golf)</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISG42MWOHSfhBlXltFKlIk63luOMs145cWo7LbwMz4r30GoX9QLlIs74m9_-JzNZ9pTgOaElebNykx-knY9ugDmmhFU5vpcdk5rmM55jen9vfZQ9CmGFcUErzh9mR7QuaV3V_Dj782WK0QwdGsFr53s5KECNkQFFh-ISkPZuiDPrrsGjYFpATm_iS2fTekAhAowoWDdCeIveG63BQxIJyKw3vYzQmfQlhxb17gp6GGJADcRrgAGN3mkIwbjkZIPIPiVMHnXOJqHwOHugpQ3wZPc-yX58_PD97PPs_OLT4uz0fKZYVeJZm9c5IS2TdUOVZqrCjeatxKzSpYac1NAqipP3qlacA0v-MQNdqLaQBeOEnmTPt7qjdUHsShsEJQVmNeVFkYjFlmidXInRm17638JJIzYB5zshfTTKgiCFampStlDqhkFDa6lzVfKKl0ypulprvdudNjV9uloqiZf2QPRwZzBL0bkrQQivymQ4KbzaKXh3OUGIojdBgbVyADdtL17kmG_QF_-gd9vbUZ1MDsygXTpYrUXFaZUKmFqpZIma30Glp4XeqNSI2qT4QcLrg4TERPgVOzmFIBbfvv4_e_HzkH25xy5B2rgMzk4xdVI4BNkWVN6F4EHfVplgsZ6jm2qI9RyJ3RyltGf7f-g26WZw6F8VoRsD</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>Hasegawa, Yumiko</creator><creator>Okada, Ayako</creator><creator>Fujii, Keisuke</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-9200</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>Putting performance bias to the front-lower side of the hole on steep slopes: Differences in strategies and movements between professional and amateur golfers</title><author>Hasegawa, Yumiko ; Okada, Ayako ; Fujii, Keisuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4870-d29211d4a9b3cf4c80bf6da048f7fe219edc3086689c66e439704ef5cd5a54613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amateurs</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goggles</topic><topic>Golf</topic><topic>Golf courses</topic><topic>Golfers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Putting (Golf)</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasegawa, Yumiko</au><au>Okada, Ayako</au><au>Fujii, Keisuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Putting performance bias to the front-lower side of the hole on steep slopes: Differences in strategies and movements between professional and amateur golfers</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0314820</spage><pages>e0314820-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>When playing on an sloped golf course, the ball often misses the hole to the front-lower side, which is also referred to as the "amateur side." This can be attributed to the difficulty in perceiving the green slope and choosing the appropriate launch direction and ball speed, especially for amateurs. The study had three main objectives. The first was to examine whether a front-down bias toward the hole could be experimentally observed in golfers' putting. Second, to measure golfers' aims and movements to determine why golfers, especially amateurs, putt poorly on steep slopes. Third, to investigate using a miniature platform how golfers recognized the steepness of the slopes and the relationship between their aim and their slope recognition. Twelve professionals and twelve intermediate amateurs were asked to perform in the 1- and 3-degree conditions (left-to-right line) at a distance of 3 m from the hole. Participants wore shutter goggles to inhibit visual feedback of outcomes. The aim, address, ball launch direction (analyzed as angles), and kinematics of the putter head and ball were measured. The results of this study experimentally confirmed the amateur side and indicated that the aim, address, and launch directions of the amateurs were smaller than those of the professionals. As for reproducing the slope task, we found that the amateurs underestimated the steepness on both conditions when compared to professionals. Additionally, golfers' aim and slope recognition were weakly correlated. These suggest that amateurs, compared to professionals, were unable to choose the optimal speed of the putter head and the launch direction of the ball in relation to the slope. Furthermore, amateurs' recognition was worse than that of professionals, which may affect their aim.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39739896</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0314820</doi><tpages>e0314820</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-9200</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-12, Vol.19 (12), p.e0314820
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3150493655
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Amateurs
Athletic Performance - physiology
Bias
Biology and Life Sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Evaluation
Experiments
Female
Goggles
Golf
Golf courses
Golfers
Humans
Kinematics
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Movement - physiology
Physical Sciences
Professionals
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Putting (Golf)
Recognition
Research and Analysis Methods
Slopes
Social Sciences
Visual perception
Young Adult
title Putting performance bias to the front-lower side of the hole on steep slopes: Differences in strategies and movements between professional and amateur golfers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A17%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20performance%20bias%20to%20the%20front-lower%20side%20of%20the%20hole%20on%20steep%20slopes:%20Differences%20in%20strategies%20and%20movements%20between%20professional%20and%20amateur%20golfers&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hasegawa,%20Yumiko&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0314820&rft.pages=e0314820-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0314820&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA821919374%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4870-d29211d4a9b3cf4c80bf6da048f7fe219edc3086689c66e439704ef5cd5a54613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3150493655&rft_id=info:pmid/39739896&rft_galeid=A821919374&rfr_iscdi=true