Between Facts and Norms: Agency Statutory Interpretation as an Autonomous Enterprise

John Willis was not just a voice crying in the wilderness. But he was that too. He warned repeatedly about the emptiness of administrative lawyers' taste for 'separation of powers,' 'democracy,' and 'rule-of-law' talk, a discourse he labelled 'theology.'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The University of Toronto law journal 2005-07, Vol.55 (3), p.497-533
Main Author: Mashaw, Jerry L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Administrative agencies
Administrative courts
Administrative law
Environmental agencies
Executive branch
Judicial reviews
Law schools
Legislation
Normativity
Public administration
Rule of law
Statutory interpretation
Statutory law
The Uniqueness of Administrative Law: Legal Values and Civil Servants' Values
Willis, John
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:John Willis was not just a voice crying in the wilderness. But he was that too. He warned repeatedly about the emptiness of administrative lawyers' taste for 'separation of powers,' 'democracy,' and 'rule-of-law' talk, a discourse he labelled 'theology.' By that epithet Willis meant to signal that much of the conversation had little to do with the practical affairs of governance. And he lamented on numerous occasions the profound failure of administrative lawyers to pay close attention to what administrative agencies actually do, how they do it, and the internal ethics that both motivate and restrain their behaviour. Willis described himself as 'a government man' or 'a legislation man' and 'a what actually happens man,' but he recognized that the profession was much more interested in remedies against government, usually in court, than in how administration could be organized to solve pressing social problems.
ISSN:0042-0220
1710-1174
1710-1174
DOI:10.1353/tlj.2005.0019