Loading…
Hero into General: Reading Myth in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Nonnus of Panopolis, and John Malalas
One of the interpretive models applied by the ancient Greeks to their myths was the recasting of heroes as generals and their lonely quests as elaborate military campaigns. In the first instances, this reimagining of mythic narratives was intended to explain the esteem in which heroes were held, len...
Saved in:
Published in: | Preternature 2014-09, Vol.3 (2), p.227-260 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 260 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Preternature |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Garstad, Benjamin |
description | One of the interpretive models applied by the ancient Greeks to their myths was the recasting of heroes as generals and their lonely quests as elaborate military campaigns. In the first instances, this reimagining of mythic narratives was intended to explain the esteem in which heroes were held, lend credibility to their legends, and extend the period of recorded history. Rather than “debunking,” the interpretation of heroes as generals was a positive attempt to bolster the reputation of the heroes and their cults. Over time this particular kind of historicization seems to have enjoyed extensive popularity, so much so that its rationale crept into even the most inhospitable genres, like epic, which rejected rationalization on the whole. Indeed, so popular was the understanding of heroes as generals, it was not necessarily made explicit in accounts that took it as a premise. The very prevalence of this historical interpretation of myth seems to have resulted in a return to at least the appearance of fable form in accounts of mythic heroes intended as historical narratives. The seismic ideological shift from a predominant paganism in the ancient Mediterranean to a predominant Christianity also finally made the historicization of myth a kind of debunking. Not that Christian versions of myth denied the existence of heroes, rather they stressed their most disreputable characteristics and deeds and attempted to undermine the regard in which heroes were held. This article will explore the development of the interpretation of heroes as generals through an examination of the accounts of three different figures: Heracles in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Dionysus in Nonnus of Panopolis, and Perseus in John Malalas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proje</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_projectmuse_journals_554989_S2161218814200008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j173t-f454d0032ad1354ab4926299e0bc5e8424de29a6158955eb2835c0f1302d4a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFqwzAQREVpoSHNoR9QyA_YlVZaWTqW0CaBQA9tz0K21xDj2EaSD_372qSUzmXnMsvMY-xJ8Bwl4PMYKFHofZoC5TKHnAMUN2wFQosMhDG3f97qe7aJseWzNAqUfMUeDxSG7blPw3ZPPQXfPbC7xneRNr93zb7eXj93h-z0vj_uXk5ZKwqZskahqjmX4GshUflSWdBgLfGyQjIKVE1gvRZoLCKVYCRWvBGSQ618gXLN1PXvGIaWqnSZIrl2mOYtXXSIyhrrPpbqywqhYKlt5hhcY21MQ3BjOF98-HaCuwWH-4_DSQduwSF_AK-HUgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hero into General: Reading Myth in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Nonnus of Panopolis, and John Malalas</title><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Garstad, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Garstad, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>One of the interpretive models applied by the ancient Greeks to their myths was the recasting of heroes as generals and their lonely quests as elaborate military campaigns. In the first instances, this reimagining of mythic narratives was intended to explain the esteem in which heroes were held, lend credibility to their legends, and extend the period of recorded history. Rather than “debunking,” the interpretation of heroes as generals was a positive attempt to bolster the reputation of the heroes and their cults. Over time this particular kind of historicization seems to have enjoyed extensive popularity, so much so that its rationale crept into even the most inhospitable genres, like epic, which rejected rationalization on the whole. Indeed, so popular was the understanding of heroes as generals, it was not necessarily made explicit in accounts that took it as a premise. The very prevalence of this historical interpretation of myth seems to have resulted in a return to at least the appearance of fable form in accounts of mythic heroes intended as historical narratives. The seismic ideological shift from a predominant paganism in the ancient Mediterranean to a predominant Christianity also finally made the historicization of myth a kind of debunking. Not that Christian versions of myth denied the existence of heroes, rather they stressed their most disreputable characteristics and deeds and attempted to undermine the regard in which heroes were held. This article will explore the development of the interpretation of heroes as generals through an examination of the accounts of three different figures: Heracles in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Dionysus in Nonnus of Panopolis, and Perseus in John Malalas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2161-2196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-2188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pennsylvania State University Press</publisher><subject>Christian history ; Creation myths ; Dionysian mysteries ; Heroes ; Legends ; Mythological time ; Mythology ; Myths ; War ; Warfare</subject><ispartof>Preternature, 2014-09, Vol.3 (2), p.227-260</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garstad, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Hero into General: Reading Myth in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Nonnus of Panopolis, and John Malalas</title><title>Preternature</title><description>One of the interpretive models applied by the ancient Greeks to their myths was the recasting of heroes as generals and their lonely quests as elaborate military campaigns. In the first instances, this reimagining of mythic narratives was intended to explain the esteem in which heroes were held, lend credibility to their legends, and extend the period of recorded history. Rather than “debunking,” the interpretation of heroes as generals was a positive attempt to bolster the reputation of the heroes and their cults. Over time this particular kind of historicization seems to have enjoyed extensive popularity, so much so that its rationale crept into even the most inhospitable genres, like epic, which rejected rationalization on the whole. Indeed, so popular was the understanding of heroes as generals, it was not necessarily made explicit in accounts that took it as a premise. The very prevalence of this historical interpretation of myth seems to have resulted in a return to at least the appearance of fable form in accounts of mythic heroes intended as historical narratives. The seismic ideological shift from a predominant paganism in the ancient Mediterranean to a predominant Christianity also finally made the historicization of myth a kind of debunking. Not that Christian versions of myth denied the existence of heroes, rather they stressed their most disreputable characteristics and deeds and attempted to undermine the regard in which heroes were held. This article will explore the development of the interpretation of heroes as generals through an examination of the accounts of three different figures: Heracles in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Dionysus in Nonnus of Panopolis, and Perseus in John Malalas.</description><subject>Christian history</subject><subject>Creation myths</subject><subject>Dionysian mysteries</subject><subject>Heroes</subject><subject>Legends</subject><subject>Mythological time</subject><subject>Mythology</subject><subject>Myths</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Warfare</subject><issn>2161-2196</issn><issn>2161-2188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpNkMFqwzAQREVpoSHNoR9QyA_YlVZaWTqW0CaBQA9tz0K21xDj2EaSD_372qSUzmXnMsvMY-xJ8Bwl4PMYKFHofZoC5TKHnAMUN2wFQosMhDG3f97qe7aJseWzNAqUfMUeDxSG7blPw3ZPPQXfPbC7xneRNr93zb7eXj93h-z0vj_uXk5ZKwqZskahqjmX4GshUflSWdBgLfGyQjIKVE1gvRZoLCKVYCRWvBGSQ618gXLN1PXvGIaWqnSZIrl2mOYtXXSIyhrrPpbqywqhYKlt5hhcY21MQ3BjOF98-HaCuwWH-4_DSQduwSF_AK-HUgc</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Garstad, Benjamin</creator><general>Pennsylvania State University Press</general><general>Penn State University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Hero into General</title><author>Garstad, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j173t-f454d0032ad1354ab4926299e0bc5e8424de29a6158955eb2835c0f1302d4a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Christian history</topic><topic>Creation myths</topic><topic>Dionysian mysteries</topic><topic>Heroes</topic><topic>Legends</topic><topic>Mythological time</topic><topic>Mythology</topic><topic>Myths</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Warfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garstad, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Preternature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garstad, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hero into General: Reading Myth in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Nonnus of Panopolis, and John Malalas</atitle><jtitle>Preternature</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>227-260</pages><issn>2161-2196</issn><eissn>2161-2188</eissn><abstract>One of the interpretive models applied by the ancient Greeks to their myths was the recasting of heroes as generals and their lonely quests as elaborate military campaigns. In the first instances, this reimagining of mythic narratives was intended to explain the esteem in which heroes were held, lend credibility to their legends, and extend the period of recorded history. Rather than “debunking,” the interpretation of heroes as generals was a positive attempt to bolster the reputation of the heroes and their cults. Over time this particular kind of historicization seems to have enjoyed extensive popularity, so much so that its rationale crept into even the most inhospitable genres, like epic, which rejected rationalization on the whole. Indeed, so popular was the understanding of heroes as generals, it was not necessarily made explicit in accounts that took it as a premise. The very prevalence of this historical interpretation of myth seems to have resulted in a return to at least the appearance of fable form in accounts of mythic heroes intended as historical narratives. The seismic ideological shift from a predominant paganism in the ancient Mediterranean to a predominant Christianity also finally made the historicization of myth a kind of debunking. Not that Christian versions of myth denied the existence of heroes, rather they stressed their most disreputable characteristics and deeds and attempted to undermine the regard in which heroes were held. This article will explore the development of the interpretation of heroes as generals through an examination of the accounts of three different figures: Heracles in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Dionysus in Nonnus of Panopolis, and Perseus in John Malalas.</abstract><pub>Pennsylvania State University Press</pub><doi>10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2161-2196 |
ispartof | Preternature, 2014-09, Vol.3 (2), p.227-260 |
issn | 2161-2196 2161-2188 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_projectmuse_journals_554989_S2161218814200008 |
source | Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; JSTOR |
subjects | Christian history Creation myths Dionysian mysteries Heroes Legends Mythological time Mythology Myths War Warfare |
title | Hero into General: Reading Myth in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Nonnus of Panopolis, and John Malalas |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A53%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proje&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hero%20into%20General:%20Reading%20Myth%20in%20Dionysius%20of%20Halicarnassus,%20Nonnus%20of%20Panopolis,%20and%20John%20Malalas&rft.jtitle=Preternature&rft.au=Garstad,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=227-260&rft.issn=2161-2196&rft.eissn=2161-2188&rft_id=info:doi/10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proje%3E10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227%3C/jstor_proje%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j173t-f454d0032ad1354ab4926299e0bc5e8424de29a6158955eb2835c0f1302d4a753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.5325/preternature.3.2.0227&rfr_iscdi=true |