Loading…
Power, Profits, and Practical Wisdom: Ricœur's Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics in Institutions
The analysis of narrative processes and metaphorical language are the topics generally focused on by business ethics researchers interested in the work of Paul Ricœur. Yet his work on political questions also applies to the ethical issues associated with organizations. Ricœur's ethical enterpri...
Saved in:
Published in: | Business & professional ethics journal 2012-01, Vol.31 (1), p.1-24 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 24 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Business & professional ethics journal |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Deslandes, Ghislain |
description | The analysis of narrative processes and metaphorical language are the topics generally focused on by business ethics researchers interested in the work of Paul Ricœur. Yet his work on political questions also applies to the ethical issues associated with organizations. Ricœur's ethical enterprise can be expressed as a triad composed of ideological, deontological, and sapiential levels, associating ostensibly opposing positions of Aristotelian and Kantian origin. In this study, I examine politics, economics, and ethics in their dialectic relation as established by Ricœur. Against a vertical, mechanistic, and axiologically neutral vision of management, he opposes the two conceptual pairs of conviction/imagination and ideology/utopia as well as a superior definition of justice associating reciprocal indebtedness and mutual disinterestedness. Through this analysis, it becomes clear that the vertical, hierarchical nature of politics tends to undermine the horizontal interactions necessary to procure just institutions in society. And any business ethic that does not acknowledge political tensions will be mute. What is needed instead is practical wisdom that is developed through interaction, and often through conflict, involving all the different players. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5840/bpej20123111 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1004390209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41705468</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41705468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-3280e2aa620a418c9ea44eaffc76d454ac00df8e9c954394a5cad87b1ffaedf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKdvvgoBH3xZ9SZN19Y3GVOHA4soPoYsTWjG1tQkVfY7_E3-LzMmw5dzudxzTsKH0DmB66xgcLPo1JICoSkh5AANKMnSJC9ocYgGQPM8oVGP0Yn3SwDIS2ADZCr7pdwIV85qE_wIi7aOi5DBSLHC78bXdn2LX4z8-e7dlceVcr5T8fypPLYtDo3ClfXeLMzKhA22Gk9DY6THpsWz1gcT-mBs60_RkRYrr87-5hC93U9fJ4_J_PlhNrmbJ5IyCElKC1BUiDEFwUghSyUYU0JrmY9rljEhAWpdqFKWGUtLJjIp6iJfEK2Fiod0iC53vZ2zH73ygS9t79r4JCcAMQIUyuga7VzSxc87pXnnzFq4TTTxLUz-H2a0P_2VNmZlve2azT4QifE9Mb4jtg3zbZoDpCQK7IWy2Haxa1v6YN2-iJEcMjYu0l_XfYyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1004390209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power, Profits, and Practical Wisdom: Ricœur's Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics in Institutions</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Deslandes, Ghislain</creator><creatorcontrib>Deslandes, Ghislain ; Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><description>The analysis of narrative processes and metaphorical language are the topics generally focused on by business ethics researchers interested in the work of Paul Ricœur. Yet his work on political questions also applies to the ethical issues associated with organizations. Ricœur's ethical enterprise can be expressed as a triad composed of ideological, deontological, and sapiential levels, associating ostensibly opposing positions of Aristotelian and Kantian origin. In this study, I examine politics, economics, and ethics in their dialectic relation as established by Ricœur. Against a vertical, mechanistic, and axiologically neutral vision of management, he opposes the two conceptual pairs of conviction/imagination and ideology/utopia as well as a superior definition of justice associating reciprocal indebtedness and mutual disinterestedness. Through this analysis, it becomes clear that the vertical, hierarchical nature of politics tends to undermine the horizontal interactions necessary to procure just institutions in society. And any business ethic that does not acknowledge political tensions will be mute. What is needed instead is practical wisdom that is developed through interaction, and often through conflict, involving all the different players.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-7828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/bpej20123111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Troy: Philosophy Documentation Center</publisher><subject>Applied ethics ; Applied Philosophy ; Aristotelean ethics ; Business and Professional Ethics ; Business ethics ; Economics ; Ethical behavior ; Ethics ; Globalization ; Morality ; Narratives ; Philosophers ; Political ethics ; Political power ; Politics ; Ricoeur, Paul ; Social ethics ; Studies ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Business & professional ethics journal, 2012-01, Vol.31 (1), p.1-24</ispartof><rights>Business and Professional Ethics Journal</rights><rights>Copyright University of Florida, Center for Applied Philosophy 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41705468$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41705468$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deslandes, Ghislain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><title>Power, Profits, and Practical Wisdom: Ricœur's Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics in Institutions</title><title>Business & professional ethics journal</title><description>The analysis of narrative processes and metaphorical language are the topics generally focused on by business ethics researchers interested in the work of Paul Ricœur. Yet his work on political questions also applies to the ethical issues associated with organizations. Ricœur's ethical enterprise can be expressed as a triad composed of ideological, deontological, and sapiential levels, associating ostensibly opposing positions of Aristotelian and Kantian origin. In this study, I examine politics, economics, and ethics in their dialectic relation as established by Ricœur. Against a vertical, mechanistic, and axiologically neutral vision of management, he opposes the two conceptual pairs of conviction/imagination and ideology/utopia as well as a superior definition of justice associating reciprocal indebtedness and mutual disinterestedness. Through this analysis, it becomes clear that the vertical, hierarchical nature of politics tends to undermine the horizontal interactions necessary to procure just institutions in society. And any business ethic that does not acknowledge political tensions will be mute. What is needed instead is practical wisdom that is developed through interaction, and often through conflict, involving all the different players.</description><subject>Applied ethics</subject><subject>Applied Philosophy</subject><subject>Aristotelean ethics</subject><subject>Business and Professional Ethics</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Ricoeur, Paul</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>0277-2027</issn><issn>2153-7828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOKdvvgoBH3xZ9SZN19Y3GVOHA4soPoYsTWjG1tQkVfY7_E3-LzMmw5dzudxzTsKH0DmB66xgcLPo1JICoSkh5AANKMnSJC9ocYgGQPM8oVGP0Yn3SwDIS2ADZCr7pdwIV85qE_wIi7aOi5DBSLHC78bXdn2LX4z8-e7dlceVcr5T8fypPLYtDo3ClfXeLMzKhA22Gk9DY6THpsWz1gcT-mBs60_RkRYrr87-5hC93U9fJ4_J_PlhNrmbJ5IyCElKC1BUiDEFwUghSyUYU0JrmY9rljEhAWpdqFKWGUtLJjIp6iJfEK2Fiod0iC53vZ2zH73ygS9t79r4JCcAMQIUyuga7VzSxc87pXnnzFq4TTTxLUz-H2a0P_2VNmZlve2azT4QifE9Mb4jtg3zbZoDpCQK7IWy2Haxa1v6YN2-iJEcMjYu0l_XfYyg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Deslandes, Ghislain</creator><general>Philosophy Documentation Center</general><general>University of Florida, Center for Applied Philosophy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Power, Profits, and Practical Wisdom: Ricœur's Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics in Institutions</title><author>Deslandes, Ghislain</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-3280e2aa620a418c9ea44eaffc76d454ac00df8e9c954394a5cad87b1ffaedf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied ethics</topic><topic>Applied Philosophy</topic><topic>Aristotelean ethics</topic><topic>Business and Professional Ethics</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Ricoeur, Paul</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deslandes, Ghislain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Business & professional ethics journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deslandes, Ghislain</au><aucorp>Philosophy Documentation Center</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power, Profits, and Practical Wisdom: Ricœur's Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics in Institutions</atitle><jtitle>Business & professional ethics journal</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>1-24</pages><issn>0277-2027</issn><eissn>2153-7828</eissn><abstract>The analysis of narrative processes and metaphorical language are the topics generally focused on by business ethics researchers interested in the work of Paul Ricœur. Yet his work on political questions also applies to the ethical issues associated with organizations. Ricœur's ethical enterprise can be expressed as a triad composed of ideological, deontological, and sapiential levels, associating ostensibly opposing positions of Aristotelian and Kantian origin. In this study, I examine politics, economics, and ethics in their dialectic relation as established by Ricœur. Against a vertical, mechanistic, and axiologically neutral vision of management, he opposes the two conceptual pairs of conviction/imagination and ideology/utopia as well as a superior definition of justice associating reciprocal indebtedness and mutual disinterestedness. Through this analysis, it becomes clear that the vertical, hierarchical nature of politics tends to undermine the horizontal interactions necessary to procure just institutions in society. And any business ethic that does not acknowledge political tensions will be mute. What is needed instead is practical wisdom that is developed through interaction, and often through conflict, involving all the different players.</abstract><cop>Troy</cop><pub>Philosophy Documentation Center</pub><doi>10.5840/bpej20123111</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-2027 |
ispartof | Business & professional ethics journal, 2012-01, Vol.31 (1), p.1-24 |
issn | 0277-2027 2153-7828 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1004390209 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Applied ethics Applied Philosophy Aristotelean ethics Business and Professional Ethics Business ethics Economics Ethical behavior Ethics Globalization Morality Narratives Philosophers Political ethics Political power Politics Ricoeur, Paul Social ethics Studies Wisdom |
title | Power, Profits, and Practical Wisdom: Ricœur's Perspectives on the Possibility of Ethics in Institutions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power,%20Profits,%20and%20Practical%20Wisdom:%20Ric%C5%93ur's%20Perspectives%20on%20the%20Possibility%20of%20Ethics%20in%20Institutions&rft.jtitle=Business%20&%20professional%20ethics%20journal&rft.au=Deslandes,%20Ghislain&rft.aucorp=Philosophy%20Documentation%20Center&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=1-24&rft.issn=0277-2027&rft.eissn=2153-7828&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/bpej20123111&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41705468%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-3280e2aa620a418c9ea44eaffc76d454ac00df8e9c954394a5cad87b1ffaedf83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1004390209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41705468&rfr_iscdi=true |