Reflection on knowledge transfer methodologies in Eastern/Western European co-operations

• Published in: EuroMed journal of business 2009-07, Vol.4 (2), p.127
• Main Authors: Dolores Sánchez Bengoa, Hans Rüdiger Kaufmann, Orange, Graham
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actors; Attitudes; Case studies; Data collection; Grounded theory; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Research methodology; Sample size; Studies; Tacit knowledge
• ISSN: 1450-2194; 1758-888X
• DOI: 10.1108/14502190910976493

Purpose - In order to win the global race for innovation as a source for competitive advantage, many companies enter into any kind of business co-operation. Beyond intending to grow merely quantitatively, co-operation partners should target to commonly create new knowledge and to transfer knowledge as a basis for qualitative growth. This apparent deficiency of practitioners is compounded by a lack of theory and empirical research on intercultural knowledge transfer. This task becomes even more daunting, when co-operation partners transcend borders, and the knowledge transfer process becomes impacted by national cultures. This paper aims to present empirical research that illuminates the effects which national cultures have on the transfer of knowledge between Central/Eastern Europe (CEE) using Russia as a case study, and Western European partners. Design/methodology/approach - The paper applies a phenomenological approach applying grounded theory for data generation and analysis. The research method is a case study, and as research techniques 11 interviews with senior Russian managers and academics were conducted and three participant observation events in Russian settings were chosen. The researchers applied a fundamental shift from a mere comparative study of cultural differences to the study of interactions. Findings - This stage of the research presents a reflection on Eastern perceptions on Western knowledge transfer methodologies related mainly to the content of the knowledge as well as the attitudes when transferring knowledge. In addition, a self-reflection on the characteristics of the Russian knowledge receivers is provided. Research limitations/implications - Limitations of this research refer to a lack of differentiation as to ownership, type of co-operation, company size or industry type. It has to be underlined that the focus of the research was to concentrate on the holistic problems that were not sufficiently addressed in previous research. On this basis more specific and differentiated further research can be conducted. Originality/value - This research aimed to develop an understanding of why Eastern and Western European partners experience different barriers when transferring and receiving knowledge and provides recommendations to overcome the barriers. It facilitates an understanding of the feelings and obstacles in the learning process between Russian and Western European partners serving as a reflective and eye-opening starting point