Loading…

Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens

Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of food protection 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.1148-1152
Main Authors: VAN LOO, Ellen J, BABU, D, CRANDALL, Philip G, RICKE, Steven C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3
container_end_page 1152
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1148
container_title Journal of food protection
container_volume 75
creator VAN LOO, Ellen J
BABU, D
CRANDALL, Philip G
RICKE, Steven C
description Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.
doi_str_mv 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1019051921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2680640641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF2LEzEUhoMobl39ByIB8XLWnMxMOrksZesHRQtV8C5kkpNu1k6ym2RA8c-bsnW9ysV53vfkPIS8BnbVtdC_Z63gDePDj6vPm10D0PRd-4QsQHZdI5lcPiWLR-SCvMj5ljHGJRfPyQXnQkI3LBfkz94kxODDgUZH13GaMBmvj1QHS3dodKD7Gzwem-tfJWlT0NKtv5-9pfsp_kS6OmAomepMv-gypxpcheInb1Ica02dHLQPudBNjHaMKSDd6XITayy_JM9cRfDV-b0k3zfX39Yfm-3XD5_Wq21jWjaURovO1oNHFBadddAaMMARjFk6EJYDGDn2Dtyg7eDY6IRAt6wpOQzMGNNekrcPvXcp3s-Yi7qNcwp1pQIGkvUgOVSqe6Dq13NO6NRd8pNOvyukTsbVSac66VTVuAJQ1XiNvTmXz-OE9jH0T3EF3p0BnY0-uqSD8fk_10sx9KJv_wLIjIuo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019051921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>VAN LOO, Ellen J ; BABU, D ; CRANDALL, Philip G ; RICKE, Steven C</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN LOO, Ellen J ; BABU, D ; CRANDALL, Philip G ; RICKE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><description>Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22691487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPRDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines, IA: International Association for Food Protection</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carya - chemistry ; Chemical contaminants ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Consumer Product Safety ; Consumers ; E coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - growth & development ; Flavoring Agents - pharmacology ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food Contamination - prevention & control ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; Food Preservation - methods ; Food safety ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Meat industry ; Meat processing ; Meat Products - microbiology ; Natural & organic foods ; Pathogens ; Poultry ; Salmonella ; Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects ; Salmonella enteritidis - growth & development ; Smoke ; Solvents ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development ; Staphylococcus infections ; Statistical analysis ; Variance analysis ; Wood]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.1148-1152</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25968565$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN LOO, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BABU, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANDALL, Philip G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICKE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><title>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carya - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Flavoring Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</subject><subject>Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Food Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Meat industry</subject><subject>Meat processing</subject><subject>Meat Products - microbiology</subject><subject>Natural &amp; organic foods</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects</subject><subject>Salmonella enteritidis - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF2LEzEUhoMobl39ByIB8XLWnMxMOrksZesHRQtV8C5kkpNu1k6ym2RA8c-bsnW9ysV53vfkPIS8BnbVtdC_Z63gDePDj6vPm10D0PRd-4QsQHZdI5lcPiWLR-SCvMj5ljHGJRfPyQXnQkI3LBfkz94kxODDgUZH13GaMBmvj1QHS3dodKD7Gzwem-tfJWlT0NKtv5-9pfsp_kS6OmAomepMv-gypxpcheInb1Ica02dHLQPudBNjHaMKSDd6XITayy_JM9cRfDV-b0k3zfX39Yfm-3XD5_Wq21jWjaURovO1oNHFBadddAaMMARjFk6EJYDGDn2Dtyg7eDY6IRAt6wpOQzMGNNekrcPvXcp3s-Yi7qNcwp1pQIGkvUgOVSqe6Dq13NO6NRd8pNOvyukTsbVSac66VTVuAJQ1XiNvTmXz-OE9jH0T3EF3p0BnY0-uqSD8fk_10sx9KJv_wLIjIuo</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>VAN LOO, Ellen J</creator><creator>BABU, D</creator><creator>CRANDALL, Philip G</creator><creator>RICKE, Steven C</creator><general>International Association for Food Protection</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</title><author>VAN LOO, Ellen J ; BABU, D ; CRANDALL, Philip G ; RICKE, Steven C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carya - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Flavoring Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</topic><topic>Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Food Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Meat industry</topic><topic>Meat processing</topic><topic>Meat Products - microbiology</topic><topic>Natural &amp; organic foods</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects</topic><topic>Salmonella enteritidis - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN LOO, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BABU, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANDALL, Philip G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICKE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN LOO, Ellen J</au><au>BABU, D</au><au>CRANDALL, Philip G</au><au>RICKE, Steven C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1148</spage><epage>1152</epage><pages>1148-1152</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><coden>JFPRDR</coden><abstract>Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.</abstract><cop>Des Moines, IA</cop><pub>International Association for Food Protection</pub><pmid>22691487</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-028X
ispartof Journal of food protection, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.1148-1152
issn 0362-028X
1944-9097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1019051921
source ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Biological and medical sciences
Carya - chemistry
Chemical contaminants
Colony Count, Microbial
Consumer Product Safety
Consumers
E coli
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - growth & development
Flavoring Agents - pharmacology
Food contamination & poisoning
Food Contamination - prevention & control
Food industries
Food Microbiology
Food Preservation - methods
Food safety
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Laboratories
Meat industry
Meat processing
Meat Products - microbiology
Natural & organic foods
Pathogens
Poultry
Salmonella
Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects
Salmonella enteritidis - growth & development
Smoke
Solvents
Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development
Staphylococcus infections
Statistical analysis
Variance analysis
Wood
title Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20of%20Commercial%20and%20Pecan%20Shell-Extracted%20Liquid%20Smoke%20Agents%20as%20Natural%20Antimicrobials%20against%20Foodborne%20Pathogens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=VAN%20LOO,%20Ellen%20J&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1148&rft.epage=1152&rft.pages=1148-1152&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft.coden=JFPRDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2680640641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019051921&rft_id=info:pmid/22691487&rfr_iscdi=true