Loading…
Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens
Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of food protection 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.1148-1152 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3 |
container_end_page | 1152 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1148 |
container_title | Journal of food protection |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | VAN LOO, Ellen J BABU, D CRANDALL, Philip G RICKE, Steven C |
description | Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1019051921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2680640641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF2LEzEUhoMobl39ByIB8XLWnMxMOrksZesHRQtV8C5kkpNu1k6ym2RA8c-bsnW9ysV53vfkPIS8BnbVtdC_Z63gDePDj6vPm10D0PRd-4QsQHZdI5lcPiWLR-SCvMj5ljHGJRfPyQXnQkI3LBfkz94kxODDgUZH13GaMBmvj1QHS3dodKD7Gzwem-tfJWlT0NKtv5-9pfsp_kS6OmAomepMv-gypxpcheInb1Ica02dHLQPudBNjHaMKSDd6XITayy_JM9cRfDV-b0k3zfX39Yfm-3XD5_Wq21jWjaURovO1oNHFBadddAaMMARjFk6EJYDGDn2Dtyg7eDY6IRAt6wpOQzMGNNekrcPvXcp3s-Yi7qNcwp1pQIGkvUgOVSqe6Dq13NO6NRd8pNOvyukTsbVSac66VTVuAJQ1XiNvTmXz-OE9jH0T3EF3p0BnY0-uqSD8fk_10sx9KJv_wLIjIuo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019051921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>VAN LOO, Ellen J ; BABU, D ; CRANDALL, Philip G ; RICKE, Steven C</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN LOO, Ellen J ; BABU, D ; CRANDALL, Philip G ; RICKE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><description>Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22691487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPRDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines, IA: International Association for Food Protection</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carya - chemistry ; Chemical contaminants ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Consumer Product Safety ; Consumers ; E coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - growth & development ; Flavoring Agents - pharmacology ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food Contamination - prevention & control ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; Food Preservation - methods ; Food safety ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Meat industry ; Meat processing ; Meat Products - microbiology ; Natural & organic foods ; Pathogens ; Poultry ; Salmonella ; Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects ; Salmonella enteritidis - growth & development ; Smoke ; Solvents ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development ; Staphylococcus infections ; Statistical analysis ; Variance analysis ; Wood]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.1148-1152</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25968565$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22691487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN LOO, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BABU, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANDALL, Philip G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICKE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><title>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carya - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - growth & development</subject><subject>Flavoring Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food Contamination - prevention & control</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Food Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Meat industry</subject><subject>Meat processing</subject><subject>Meat Products - microbiology</subject><subject>Natural & organic foods</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects</subject><subject>Salmonella enteritidis - growth & development</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF2LEzEUhoMobl39ByIB8XLWnMxMOrksZesHRQtV8C5kkpNu1k6ym2RA8c-bsnW9ysV53vfkPIS8BnbVtdC_Z63gDePDj6vPm10D0PRd-4QsQHZdI5lcPiWLR-SCvMj5ljHGJRfPyQXnQkI3LBfkz94kxODDgUZH13GaMBmvj1QHS3dodKD7Gzwem-tfJWlT0NKtv5-9pfsp_kS6OmAomepMv-gypxpcheInb1Ica02dHLQPudBNjHaMKSDd6XITayy_JM9cRfDV-b0k3zfX39Yfm-3XD5_Wq21jWjaURovO1oNHFBadddAaMMARjFk6EJYDGDn2Dtyg7eDY6IRAt6wpOQzMGNNekrcPvXcp3s-Yi7qNcwp1pQIGkvUgOVSqe6Dq13NO6NRd8pNOvyukTsbVSac66VTVuAJQ1XiNvTmXz-OE9jH0T3EF3p0BnY0-uqSD8fk_10sx9KJv_wLIjIuo</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>VAN LOO, Ellen J</creator><creator>BABU, D</creator><creator>CRANDALL, Philip G</creator><creator>RICKE, Steven C</creator><general>International Association for Food Protection</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</title><author>VAN LOO, Ellen J ; BABU, D ; CRANDALL, Philip G ; RICKE, Steven C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carya - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - growth & development</topic><topic>Flavoring Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food Contamination - prevention & control</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Food Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Meat industry</topic><topic>Meat processing</topic><topic>Meat Products - microbiology</topic><topic>Natural & organic foods</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects</topic><topic>Salmonella enteritidis - growth & development</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN LOO, Ellen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BABU, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANDALL, Philip G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RICKE, Steven C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN LOO, Ellen J</au><au>BABU, D</au><au>CRANDALL, Philip G</au><au>RICKE, Steven C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1148</spage><epage>1152</epage><pages>1148-1152</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><coden>JFPRDR</coden><abstract>Liquid smoke extracts have traditionally been used as flavoring agents, are known to possess antioxidant properties, and serve as natural alternatives to conventional antimicrobials. The antimicrobial efficacies of commercial liquid smoke samples may vary depending on their source and composition and the methods used to extract and concentrate the smoke. We investigated the MICs of eight commercial liquid smoke samples against Salmonella Enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli . The commercial liquid smoke samples purchased were supplied by the manufacturer as water-based or concentrated extracts of smoke from different wood sources. The MICs of the commercial smokes to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens ranged from 0.5 to 6.0% for E. coli, 0.5 to 8.0% for Salmonella, and 0.38 to 6% for S. aureus. The MIC for each liquid smoke sample was similar in its effect on both E. coli and Salmonella. Solvent-extracted antimicrobials prepared using pecan shells displayed significant differences between their inhibitory concentrations depending on the type of solvent used for extraction. The results indicated that the liquid smoke samples tested in this study could serve as effective natural antimicrobials and that their inhibitory effects depended more on the solvents used for extraction than the wood source.</abstract><cop>Des Moines, IA</cop><pub>International Association for Food Protection</pub><pmid>22691487</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2012-06, Vol.75 (6), p.1148-1152 |
issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1019051921 |
source | ScienceDirect (Online service) |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Biological and medical sciences Carya - chemistry Chemical contaminants Colony Count, Microbial Consumer Product Safety Consumers E coli Escherichia coli - drug effects Escherichia coli - growth & development Flavoring Agents - pharmacology Food contamination & poisoning Food Contamination - prevention & control Food industries Food Microbiology Food Preservation - methods Food safety Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Laboratories Meat industry Meat processing Meat Products - microbiology Natural & organic foods Pathogens Poultry Salmonella Salmonella enteritidis - drug effects Salmonella enteritidis - growth & development Smoke Solvents Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development Staphylococcus infections Statistical analysis Variance analysis Wood |
title | Screening of Commercial and Pecan Shell-Extracted Liquid Smoke Agents as Natural Antimicrobials against Foodborne Pathogens |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20of%20Commercial%20and%20Pecan%20Shell-Extracted%20Liquid%20Smoke%20Agents%20as%20Natural%20Antimicrobials%20against%20Foodborne%20Pathogens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=VAN%20LOO,%20Ellen%20J&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1148&rft.epage=1152&rft.pages=1148-1152&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft.coden=JFPRDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2680640641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-a64d315be6defdf13c1c12e1cc7f16d211c9b5f1f8ad8f0bf66ef7a649880ccc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019051921&rft_id=info:pmid/22691487&rfr_iscdi=true |