Loading…
New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?
As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To addres...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of marketing research 2012-06, Vol.49 (3), p.408-423 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3 |
container_end_page | 423 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 408 |
container_title | Journal of marketing research |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | GIELENS, KATRIJN |
description | As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1509/jmr.10.0183 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1020326918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41714435</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41714435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Lw0AQxRdRMEZPnoWAR0nd7w8vUopWIaiHeg7ZzYYmtN26u7H437uh4lzmDfNjHvMAuEZwhhhU98PWz5KGSJITkCFGRSmQIqcggxDjElMizsFFCANMhaDIAHmzh-LDu3Y0MTwUq7Ut5rvYty7aIrq06b-bJKtG202x9O4Q14-X4KxrNsFe_fUcfD4_rRYvZfW-fF3Mq9IQKmKpGdccQwoRYpoRxbSSadLCGCG7FhMsldDGIMkbDXnHaEsNlsRiyxWWluTg9nh3793XaEOsBzf6XbKsEcSQYK7Sozm4O1LGuxC87eq977eN_0lQPaVSp1QmPaWS6JsjPYTo_D9KkUCUEkZ-AXk9W8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020326918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creator><creatorcontrib>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creatorcontrib><description>As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1509/jmr.10.0183</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMKRAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Marketing Association</publisher><subject>Brands ; Competition ; Consumer economics ; Consumer research ; Economic competition ; House brands ; Market positioning ; Market share ; Marketing ; Product development ; Product introduction ; Product lines ; Product standards ; Retail stores ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing research, 2012-06, Vol.49 (3), p.408-423</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012, American Marketing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Marketing Association Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41714435$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41714435$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creatorcontrib><title>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</title><title>Journal of marketing research</title><description>As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.</description><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>House brands</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Market share</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product introduction</subject><subject>Product lines</subject><subject>Product standards</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-2437</issn><issn>1547-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1Lw0AQxRdRMEZPnoWAR0nd7w8vUopWIaiHeg7ZzYYmtN26u7H437uh4lzmDfNjHvMAuEZwhhhU98PWz5KGSJITkCFGRSmQIqcggxDjElMizsFFCANMhaDIAHmzh-LDu3Y0MTwUq7Ut5rvYty7aIrq06b-bJKtG202x9O4Q14-X4KxrNsFe_fUcfD4_rRYvZfW-fF3Mq9IQKmKpGdccQwoRYpoRxbSSadLCGCG7FhMsldDGIMkbDXnHaEsNlsRiyxWWluTg9nh3793XaEOsBzf6XbKsEcSQYK7Sozm4O1LGuxC87eq977eN_0lQPaVSp1QmPaWS6JsjPYTo_D9KkUCUEkZ-AXk9W8g</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creator><general>American Marketing Association</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</title><author>GIELENS, KATRIJN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>House brands</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Market share</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product introduction</topic><topic>Product lines</topic><topic>Product standards</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GIELENS, KATRIJN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>408-423</pages><issn>0022-2437</issn><eissn>1547-7193</eissn><coden>JMKRAE</coden><abstract>As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Marketing Association</pub><doi>10.1509/jmr.10.0183</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2437 |
ispartof | Journal of marketing research, 2012-06, Vol.49 (3), p.408-423 |
issn | 0022-2437 1547-7193 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1020326918 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Brands Competition Consumer economics Consumer research Economic competition House brands Market positioning Market share Marketing Product development Product introduction Product lines Product standards Retail stores Studies |
title | New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Products:%20The%20Antidote%20to%20Private%20Label%20Growth?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20research&rft.au=GIELENS,%20KATRIJN&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=408-423&rft.issn=0022-2437&rft.eissn=1547-7193&rft.coden=JMKRAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1509/jmr.10.0183&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41714435%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020326918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41714435&rfr_iscdi=true |