Loading…

New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?

As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To addres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marketing research 2012-06, Vol.49 (3), p.408-423
Main Author: GIELENS, KATRIJN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3
container_end_page 423
container_issue 3
container_start_page 408
container_title Journal of marketing research
container_volume 49
creator GIELENS, KATRIJN
description As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.1509/jmr.10.0183
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1020326918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41714435</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41714435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Lw0AQxRdRMEZPnoWAR0nd7w8vUopWIaiHeg7ZzYYmtN26u7H437uh4lzmDfNjHvMAuEZwhhhU98PWz5KGSJITkCFGRSmQIqcggxDjElMizsFFCANMhaDIAHmzh-LDu3Y0MTwUq7Ut5rvYty7aIrq06b-bJKtG202x9O4Q14-X4KxrNsFe_fUcfD4_rRYvZfW-fF3Mq9IQKmKpGdccQwoRYpoRxbSSadLCGCG7FhMsldDGIMkbDXnHaEsNlsRiyxWWluTg9nh3793XaEOsBzf6XbKsEcSQYK7Sozm4O1LGuxC87eq977eN_0lQPaVSp1QmPaWS6JsjPYTo_D9KkUCUEkZ-AXk9W8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020326918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creator><creatorcontrib>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creatorcontrib><description>As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1509/jmr.10.0183</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMKRAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Marketing Association</publisher><subject>Brands ; Competition ; Consumer economics ; Consumer research ; Economic competition ; House brands ; Market positioning ; Market share ; Marketing ; Product development ; Product introduction ; Product lines ; Product standards ; Retail stores ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing research, 2012-06, Vol.49 (3), p.408-423</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012, American Marketing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Marketing Association Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41714435$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41714435$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creatorcontrib><title>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</title><title>Journal of marketing research</title><description>As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.</description><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>House brands</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Market share</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product introduction</subject><subject>Product lines</subject><subject>Product standards</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-2437</issn><issn>1547-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1Lw0AQxRdRMEZPnoWAR0nd7w8vUopWIaiHeg7ZzYYmtN26u7H437uh4lzmDfNjHvMAuEZwhhhU98PWz5KGSJITkCFGRSmQIqcggxDjElMizsFFCANMhaDIAHmzh-LDu3Y0MTwUq7Ut5rvYty7aIrq06b-bJKtG202x9O4Q14-X4KxrNsFe_fUcfD4_rRYvZfW-fF3Mq9IQKmKpGdccQwoRYpoRxbSSadLCGCG7FhMsldDGIMkbDXnHaEsNlsRiyxWWluTg9nh3793XaEOsBzf6XbKsEcSQYK7Sozm4O1LGuxC87eq977eN_0lQPaVSp1QmPaWS6JsjPYTo_D9KkUCUEkZ-AXk9W8g</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creator><general>American Marketing Association</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</title><author>GIELENS, KATRIJN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>House brands</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Market share</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product introduction</topic><topic>Product lines</topic><topic>Product standards</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GIELENS, KATRIJN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GIELENS, KATRIJN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>408-423</pages><issn>0022-2437</issn><eissn>1547-7193</eissn><coden>JMKRAE</coden><abstract>As private labels (PLs) continue to grow in power and market share, product innovation has become one of the strongest weapons in the national brand (NB) manufacturer's arsenal. In this article, the author assesses when and to what extent new products change NBs' market position. To address this question, more than 300 NB and PL introductions are analyzed using a multibreak model that quantifies the impact of product introductions on own share, rival NB and PL share, and category sales. Drawing on empirical generalizations, the author finds that products introduced by leading NBs, standard PLs, and premium PLs are more likely to increase category sales than products introduced by follower NBs or economy PLs. New products introduced by leader and follower NBs more often boost own share. Thus, new products help prevent the decline of NB shares. With respect to competitive impact, new products affect rival shares, with the exception of those launched by economy PLs. Still, NBs tend to hurt rival NBs more often than PLs, and only the leading NB is likely to steal share from all three PL tiers. Moreover, standard PLs tend to be harmed less often by rival new products, unless introduced by the leading NB. Overall, PLs are more likely to be affected by a NB that maintains a large price gap and offers new products with new intrinsic or usage benefits. To fight economy PLs successfully, however, NBs must maintain a smaller price gap, while offering products that focus less on intrinsic and usage benefits.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Marketing Association</pub><doi>10.1509/jmr.10.0183</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2437
ispartof Journal of marketing research, 2012-06, Vol.49 (3), p.408-423
issn 0022-2437
1547-7193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1020326918
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Nexis UK; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sage Journals Online
subjects Brands
Competition
Consumer economics
Consumer research
Economic competition
House brands
Market positioning
Market share
Marketing
Product development
Product introduction
Product lines
Product standards
Retail stores
Studies
title New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Products:%20The%20Antidote%20to%20Private%20Label%20Growth?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20research&rft.au=GIELENS,%20KATRIJN&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=408-423&rft.issn=0022-2437&rft.eissn=1547-7193&rft.coden=JMKRAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1509/jmr.10.0183&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41714435%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b56b62040115b5395b98040b7cc78fd232897bcc186ab06f54d4c283e2e6928e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020326918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41714435&rfr_iscdi=true