The Empirically Corrected EP-TOMS Total Ozone Data Against Brewer Measurements at El Arenosillo (Southwestern Spain)

• Published in: IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.3039-3045
• Main Authors: Anton, Manuel, Vilaplana, José Manuel, Kroon, Mark, Serrano, Antonio, Parias, Marta, Cancillo, María Luisa, de la Morena, Benito A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aircraft instrumentation; algorithms; Applied geophysics; Degradation; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; Instruments; Internal geophysics; Layout; Meteorology; NASA; ozone; Probes; Radiometry; Remote monitoring; Satellite broadcasting; Spectroradiometers; Spectroscopy; Studies; ultraviolet (UV) radiometry
• ISSN: 0196-2892; 1558-0644
• DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2043257

This paper focuses on the validation of the empirically corrected total ozone column (TOC) data provided by the Earth Probe Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (EP-TOMS) using ground-based measurements recorded by a well-calibrated Brewer spectroradiometer located at El Arenosillo (Spain). In addition, satellite TOC observations derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) with the TOMS algorithm are also used in this paper. The agreement between EP-TOMS TOC data and Brewer measurements is excellent (R 2 ~ 0.92) even for the period 2000-2005 when a higher EP-TOMS instrument degradation occurred. Despite its low magnitude, the EP-TOMS-Brewer relative differences depend on the solar zenith angle (SZA), showing a clear seasonal cycle with amplitude between ±2% and ±4%. Conversely, OMI-Brewer relative differences show a constant negative value around -1% with no significant dependence on SZA. No significant dependence on the ground-based to satellite-based differences with respect to the EP-TOMS scene or to the OMI crosstrack position is observed for either satellite retrieval algorithm. Finally, TOC, estimated by the two satellite instruments, have also been compared, showing a good agreement (R 2 ~ 0.88). Overall, we conclude that the empirical correction of the EP-TOMS data record provides a reprocessed set of high quality. However, EP-TOMS data after year 2000 should not be used in calculations of global-ozone trending due to remaining errors in the data set and because it is no longer an independent data set.