Loading…
Racial Composition, White Racial Attitudes, and Black Representation: Testing the Racial Threat Hypothesis in the United States Senate
We make the case for why the racial threat hypothesis should characterize the relationship between states' racial composition, whites' racial attitudes, and black representation in the United States Senate. Consistent with this claim, we find that senators from states with larger percentag...
Saved in:
Published in: | Political behavior 2012-09, Vol.34 (3), p.391-410 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3 |
container_end_page | 410 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 391 |
container_title | Political behavior |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Avery, James M. Fine, Jeffrey A. |
description | We make the case for why the racial threat hypothesis should characterize the relationship between states' racial composition, whites' racial attitudes, and black representation in the United States Senate. Consistent with this claim, we find that senators from states with larger percentages of African-Americans among the electorate and more racially conservative preferences among whites provide worse representation of black interests in the Senate than their counterparts. We also apply theories of congressional cross-pressures in considering how senator partisanship and region moderate the effect of white racial attitudes on black representation. Finally, consistent with the racial threat hypothesis, we show that the negative effect of white racial attitudes on the quality of black representation is stronger when state unemployment rates are higher. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11109-011-9173-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1030483099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23262393</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23262393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KAzEQhYMoWKsP4IUQ8Laryc5mf7yrRa1QEPqDl0s2zbapbbImKbQv4HObulK88WqGmfOdGQ5C15TcUUKye0cpJUVEKI0KmkG0O0EdykKTpnl2ijqEFiQqICbn6MK5FSGBgryDvsZcKL7GA7NpjFNeGd3D70vlJf7d9L1XfjuXroe5nuPHNRcfeCwbK53Unh-IBzyVziu9wH555KZLK7nHw31jwtQph5X-2c90cJ_jSWClwxOpQ71EZzVfO3n1W7to9vw0HQyj0dvL66A_igRA7iPgkIPgNM2YECDyhMVVKtIwZlkqmaioFDXjCatpUmeQcwaC0aJKYpgnRFbQRbetb2PN5zY8Xa7M1upwsqQESJIDKYqgoq1KWOOclXXZWLXhdh9E5SHuso27DHGXh7jLXWDilnFBqxfS_nX-H7ppoZXzxh6vxBCnMRQA34NtjYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030483099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Racial Composition, White Racial Attitudes, and Black Representation: Testing the Racial Threat Hypothesis in the United States Senate</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Avery, James M. ; Fine, Jeffrey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Avery, James M. ; Fine, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>We make the case for why the racial threat hypothesis should characterize the relationship between states' racial composition, whites' racial attitudes, and black representation in the United States Senate. Consistent with this claim, we find that senators from states with larger percentages of African-Americans among the electorate and more racially conservative preferences among whites provide worse representation of black interests in the Senate than their counterparts. We also apply theories of congressional cross-pressures in considering how senator partisanship and region moderate the effect of white racial attitudes on black representation. Finally, consistent with the racial threat hypothesis, we show that the negative effect of white racial attitudes on the quality of black representation is stronger when state unemployment rates are higher.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11109-011-9173-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>African American studies ; African Americans ; Attitudes ; Conservatism ; Liberalism ; Original Paper ; Political attitudes ; Political behavior ; Political partisanship ; Political representation ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Race relations ; Senators ; Sociology ; Unemployment rates ; Voting ; Voting rights ; White people</subject><ispartof>Political behavior, 2012-09, Vol.34 (3), p.391-410</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1030483099/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1030483099?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21394,27924,27925,33611,33985,43733,43948,58238,58471,74221,74468</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avery, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><title>Racial Composition, White Racial Attitudes, and Black Representation: Testing the Racial Threat Hypothesis in the United States Senate</title><title>Political behavior</title><addtitle>Polit Behav</addtitle><description>We make the case for why the racial threat hypothesis should characterize the relationship between states' racial composition, whites' racial attitudes, and black representation in the United States Senate. Consistent with this claim, we find that senators from states with larger percentages of African-Americans among the electorate and more racially conservative preferences among whites provide worse representation of black interests in the Senate than their counterparts. We also apply theories of congressional cross-pressures in considering how senator partisanship and region moderate the effect of white racial attitudes on black representation. Finally, consistent with the racial threat hypothesis, we show that the negative effect of white racial attitudes on the quality of black representation is stronger when state unemployment rates are higher.</description><subject>African American studies</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Race relations</subject><subject>Senators</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Unemployment rates</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>0190-9320</issn><issn>1573-6687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1KAzEQhYMoWKsP4IUQ8Laryc5mf7yrRa1QEPqDl0s2zbapbbImKbQv4HObulK88WqGmfOdGQ5C15TcUUKye0cpJUVEKI0KmkG0O0EdykKTpnl2ijqEFiQqICbn6MK5FSGBgryDvsZcKL7GA7NpjFNeGd3D70vlJf7d9L1XfjuXroe5nuPHNRcfeCwbK53Unh-IBzyVziu9wH555KZLK7nHw31jwtQph5X-2c90cJ_jSWClwxOpQ71EZzVfO3n1W7to9vw0HQyj0dvL66A_igRA7iPgkIPgNM2YECDyhMVVKtIwZlkqmaioFDXjCatpUmeQcwaC0aJKYpgnRFbQRbetb2PN5zY8Xa7M1upwsqQESJIDKYqgoq1KWOOclXXZWLXhdh9E5SHuso27DHGXh7jLXWDilnFBqxfS_nX-H7ppoZXzxh6vxBCnMRQA34NtjYk</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Avery, James M.</creator><creator>Fine, Jeffrey A.</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Racial Composition, White Racial Attitudes, and Black Representation: Testing the Racial Threat Hypothesis in the United States Senate</title><author>Avery, James M. ; Fine, Jeffrey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>African American studies</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Race relations</topic><topic>Senators</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Unemployment rates</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avery, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avery, James M.</au><au>Fine, Jeffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Racial Composition, White Racial Attitudes, and Black Representation: Testing the Racial Threat Hypothesis in the United States Senate</atitle><jtitle>Political behavior</jtitle><stitle>Polit Behav</stitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>391-410</pages><issn>0190-9320</issn><eissn>1573-6687</eissn><abstract>We make the case for why the racial threat hypothesis should characterize the relationship between states' racial composition, whites' racial attitudes, and black representation in the United States Senate. Consistent with this claim, we find that senators from states with larger percentages of African-Americans among the electorate and more racially conservative preferences among whites provide worse representation of black interests in the Senate than their counterparts. We also apply theories of congressional cross-pressures in considering how senator partisanship and region moderate the effect of white racial attitudes on black representation. Finally, consistent with the racial threat hypothesis, we show that the negative effect of white racial attitudes on the quality of black representation is stronger when state unemployment rates are higher.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11109-011-9173-x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-9320 |
ispartof | Political behavior, 2012-09, Vol.34 (3), p.391-410 |
issn | 0190-9320 1573-6687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1030483099 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Springer Link |
subjects | African American studies African Americans Attitudes Conservatism Liberalism Original Paper Political attitudes Political behavior Political partisanship Political representation Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Race relations Senators Sociology Unemployment rates Voting Voting rights White people |
title | Racial Composition, White Racial Attitudes, and Black Representation: Testing the Racial Threat Hypothesis in the United States Senate |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T13%3A36%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Racial%20Composition,%20White%20Racial%20Attitudes,%20and%20Black%20Representation:%20Testing%20the%20Racial%20Threat%20Hypothesis%20in%20the%20United%20States%20Senate&rft.jtitle=Political%20behavior&rft.au=Avery,%20James%20M.&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=391-410&rft.issn=0190-9320&rft.eissn=1573-6687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11109-011-9173-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23262393%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-3a383ca1675cc3c8452b6c63a3576e5cb1ecf5a45f14f738a53c519b423d40eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030483099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23262393&rfr_iscdi=true |