Loading…
Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery
The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2012-09, Vol.188 (9), p.769 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c765-7bc8742cda874376200ca224b1e46336070f52d2ae9e7f471dafd7e628f007143 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 769 |
container_title | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie |
container_volume | 188 |
creator | Zabel-du Bois, A Milker-zabel, S Henzel, M Popp, W Debus, J Sack, H Engenhart-cabillic, R |
description | The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the required resources (technical equipment and medical staff) for stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery. At two radiotherapy centers of excellence (University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Marburg/Gießen), the manpower and time required for the implementation of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was prospectively collected consistently over a 3-month period. The data were collected using specifically developed process acquisition tools and standard forms and were evaluated using specific process analysis tools. For intracranial (extracranial) fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and radiosurgery (RS), a total of 1,925 (270) and 199 (36) records, respectively, could be evaluated. The approximate time needed to customize the immobilization device was median 37 min (89 min) for FRST and 31 min (26 min) for RS, for the contrast enhanced planning studies 22 and 27 min (25 and 28 min), for physical treatment planning 122 and 59 min (187 and 27 min), for the first and routine radiotherapy sessions for FSRT 40 and 13 min (58 and 31 min), respectively. The median time needed for the RS session was 58 min (45 min). The corresponding minimal manpower needed was 2 technicians for customization of the immobilization device, 2.5 technicians and 1 consultant for the contrast-enhanced planning studies, 1 consultant, 0.5 resident and 0.67 medical physics expert (MPE) for physical treatment planning, as well as 1 consultant, 0.5 resident, and 2.5 technicians for the first radiotherapy treatment and 2.33 technicians for routine radiotherapy sessions. For the first time, the resource requirements for a radiotherapy department for the maintenance, protection and optimization of operational readiness for the application of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was determined methodically.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00066-012-0140-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1037275515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2748861291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c765-7bc8742cda874376200ca224b1e46336070f52d2ae9e7f471dafd7e628f007143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwGvxk6y2aR7lFI_oOClB29lmkzqlu1uTbJC_73x4zA85j2YN-8xdivhQQLYWQIAYwRIVUaDkGdsInXVCGia93M2AWkbYWU9v2RXKe0BpNGNnrBu-YXdiLkdej4EntsD3XPMmXqPvaMf7kC-ddjxlDGEIvaeR0rDGB0l7sfY9ruiUaQho8ut4xF9O-QPing8zX6XNMYdxdM1uwjYJbr5xylbPy3Xixexent-XTyuhLOmFnbr5lYr57FAZY0CcKiU3krSpqoMWAi18gqpIRu0lR6Dt2TUPJQmSugpu_s7e4zD50gpb_bl2744biRUVtm6lnX1DeZHW7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037275515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Zabel-du Bois, A ; Milker-zabel, S ; Henzel, M ; Popp, W ; Debus, J ; Sack, H ; Engenhart-cabillic, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Zabel-du Bois, A ; Milker-zabel, S ; Henzel, M ; Popp, W ; Debus, J ; Sack, H ; Engenhart-cabillic, R</creatorcontrib><description>The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the required resources (technical equipment and medical staff) for stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery. At two radiotherapy centers of excellence (University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Marburg/Gießen), the manpower and time required for the implementation of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was prospectively collected consistently over a 3-month period. The data were collected using specifically developed process acquisition tools and standard forms and were evaluated using specific process analysis tools. For intracranial (extracranial) fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and radiosurgery (RS), a total of 1,925 (270) and 199 (36) records, respectively, could be evaluated. The approximate time needed to customize the immobilization device was median 37 min (89 min) for FRST and 31 min (26 min) for RS, for the contrast enhanced planning studies 22 and 27 min (25 and 28 min), for physical treatment planning 122 and 59 min (187 and 27 min), for the first and routine radiotherapy sessions for FSRT 40 and 13 min (58 and 31 min), respectively. The median time needed for the RS session was 58 min (45 min). The corresponding minimal manpower needed was 2 technicians for customization of the immobilization device, 2.5 technicians and 1 consultant for the contrast-enhanced planning studies, 1 consultant, 0.5 resident and 0.67 medical physics expert (MPE) for physical treatment planning, as well as 1 consultant, 0.5 resident, and 2.5 technicians for the first radiotherapy treatment and 2.33 technicians for routine radiotherapy sessions. For the first time, the resource requirements for a radiotherapy department for the maintenance, protection and optimization of operational readiness for the application of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was determined methodically.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-7158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-099X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00066-012-0140-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><ispartof>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2012-09, Vol.188 (9), p.769</ispartof><rights>Urban & Vogel 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c765-7bc8742cda874376200ca224b1e46336070f52d2ae9e7f471dafd7e628f007143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zabel-du Bois, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milker-zabel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henzel, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popp, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debus, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sack, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engenhart-cabillic, R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery</title><title>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</title><description>The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the required resources (technical equipment and medical staff) for stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery. At two radiotherapy centers of excellence (University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Marburg/Gießen), the manpower and time required for the implementation of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was prospectively collected consistently over a 3-month period. The data were collected using specifically developed process acquisition tools and standard forms and were evaluated using specific process analysis tools. For intracranial (extracranial) fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and radiosurgery (RS), a total of 1,925 (270) and 199 (36) records, respectively, could be evaluated. The approximate time needed to customize the immobilization device was median 37 min (89 min) for FRST and 31 min (26 min) for RS, for the contrast enhanced planning studies 22 and 27 min (25 and 28 min), for physical treatment planning 122 and 59 min (187 and 27 min), for the first and routine radiotherapy sessions for FSRT 40 and 13 min (58 and 31 min), respectively. The median time needed for the RS session was 58 min (45 min). The corresponding minimal manpower needed was 2 technicians for customization of the immobilization device, 2.5 technicians and 1 consultant for the contrast-enhanced planning studies, 1 consultant, 0.5 resident and 0.67 medical physics expert (MPE) for physical treatment planning, as well as 1 consultant, 0.5 resident, and 2.5 technicians for the first radiotherapy treatment and 2.33 technicians for routine radiotherapy sessions. For the first time, the resource requirements for a radiotherapy department for the maintenance, protection and optimization of operational readiness for the application of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was determined methodically.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><issn>0179-7158</issn><issn>1439-099X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwGvxk6y2aR7lFI_oOClB29lmkzqlu1uTbJC_73x4zA85j2YN-8xdivhQQLYWQIAYwRIVUaDkGdsInXVCGia93M2AWkbYWU9v2RXKe0BpNGNnrBu-YXdiLkdej4EntsD3XPMmXqPvaMf7kC-ddjxlDGEIvaeR0rDGB0l7sfY9ruiUaQho8ut4xF9O-QPing8zX6XNMYdxdM1uwjYJbr5xylbPy3Xixexent-XTyuhLOmFnbr5lYr57FAZY0CcKiU3krSpqoMWAi18gqpIRu0lR6Dt2TUPJQmSugpu_s7e4zD50gpb_bl2744biRUVtm6lnX1DeZHW7M</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Zabel-du Bois, A</creator><creator>Milker-zabel, S</creator><creator>Henzel, M</creator><creator>Popp, W</creator><creator>Debus, J</creator><creator>Sack, H</creator><creator>Engenhart-cabillic, R</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery</title><author>Zabel-du Bois, A ; Milker-zabel, S ; Henzel, M ; Popp, W ; Debus, J ; Sack, H ; Engenhart-cabillic, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c765-7bc8742cda874376200ca224b1e46336070f52d2ae9e7f471dafd7e628f007143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zabel-du Bois, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milker-zabel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henzel, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popp, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debus, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sack, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engenhart-cabillic, R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zabel-du Bois, A</au><au>Milker-zabel, S</au><au>Henzel, M</au><au>Popp, W</au><au>Debus, J</au><au>Sack, H</au><au>Engenhart-cabillic, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery</atitle><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>769</spage><pages>769-</pages><issn>0179-7158</issn><eissn>1439-099X</eissn><abstract>The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the required resources (technical equipment and medical staff) for stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery. At two radiotherapy centers of excellence (University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Marburg/Gießen), the manpower and time required for the implementation of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was prospectively collected consistently over a 3-month period. The data were collected using specifically developed process acquisition tools and standard forms and were evaluated using specific process analysis tools. For intracranial (extracranial) fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and radiosurgery (RS), a total of 1,925 (270) and 199 (36) records, respectively, could be evaluated. The approximate time needed to customize the immobilization device was median 37 min (89 min) for FRST and 31 min (26 min) for RS, for the contrast enhanced planning studies 22 and 27 min (25 and 28 min), for physical treatment planning 122 and 59 min (187 and 27 min), for the first and routine radiotherapy sessions for FSRT 40 and 13 min (58 and 31 min), respectively. The median time needed for the RS session was 58 min (45 min). The corresponding minimal manpower needed was 2 technicians for customization of the immobilization device, 2.5 technicians and 1 consultant for the contrast-enhanced planning studies, 1 consultant, 0.5 resident and 0.67 medical physics expert (MPE) for physical treatment planning, as well as 1 consultant, 0.5 resident, and 2.5 technicians for the first radiotherapy treatment and 2.33 technicians for routine radiotherapy sessions. For the first time, the resource requirements for a radiotherapy department for the maintenance, protection and optimization of operational readiness for the application of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was determined methodically.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00066-012-0140-1</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0179-7158 |
ispartof | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2012-09, Vol.188 (9), p.769 |
issn | 0179-7158 1439-099X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1037275515 |
source | Springer Nature |
title | Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A27%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20time,%20attendance%20of%20medical%20staff,%20and%20resources%20during%20stereotactic%20radiotherapy/radiosurgery&rft.jtitle=Strahlentherapie%20und%20Onkologie&rft.au=Zabel-du%20Bois,%20A&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=769&rft.pages=769-&rft.issn=0179-7158&rft.eissn=1439-099X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00066-012-0140-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2748861291%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c765-7bc8742cda874376200ca224b1e46336070f52d2ae9e7f471dafd7e628f007143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037275515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |