Loading…

C038: Categorization of blood pressure by conventional versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement

We categorized blood pressure (BP) status (normotension [NTN] or hypertension [HTN]) in a population-based sample of 495 adults ≥45 years old by home, and office measurements of BP (conventional), and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Categorization using conventional measures of BP was de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of hypertension 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.223A-223A
Main Authors: Schwartz, G.L., Meissner, I., Whisnant, J.P., Sheps, S.G., O'Fallon, W.M., Covalt, J.L., Sicks, J.D., Baily, K.R., Wiebers, D.O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 223A
container_issue S2
container_start_page 223A
container_title American journal of hypertension
container_volume 13
creator Schwartz, G.L.
Meissner, I.
Whisnant, J.P.
Sheps, S.G.
O'Fallon, W.M.
Covalt, J.L.
Sicks, J.D.
Baily, K.R.
Wiebers, D.O.
description We categorized blood pressure (BP) status (normotension [NTN] or hypertension [HTN]) in a population-based sample of 495 adults ≥45 years old by home, and office measurements of BP (conventional), and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Categorization using conventional measures of BP was determined by the average of two random-zero measurements obtained at home plus four measures obtained in the office. HTN was defined as systolic (S) BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic (D) BP ≥ 90 mm Hg (JNC VI criteria). Categorization using ABPM was determined by the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the awake period (AP), and separately on the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the asleep period (SP) (JNC VI criteria). HTN during the AP was defined as average SBP ≥ 135 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 85 mm Hg. HTN during the SP was defined as average SBP ≥ 120 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 75 mm Hg. Of 209 subjects categorized as HTN by conventional measurement, 30 (14%) were categorized as NTN by average AP BP. Of 286 subjects categorized as NTN by conventional measurement, 71 (25%) were categorized as HTN by average AP BP and 70 (24%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Of 245 subjects classified as NTN by average AP BP, 47 (19%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Compared to conventional measurement, ABPM identifies more individuals at risk from elevated BP. Conventional BP is associated with high rates of both white coat NTN (24%) and white coat HTN (14%). These observations argue for more routine use of 24-hour ABPM to determine individual risk from elevated BP.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00758-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_natur</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1038141889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753710931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i919-b5d94fbe88b5b51c8cec4993616e99ebea4062dfa7356d2b6c5a479a662287bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_ghDwoodokja_vElxThh4sIfhJSRtqp1tM5N2OP96OyYKnt7hfd6X974AnBN8TTDhN89YKoYE5uQS4yuMBZOIHYAJUSlBglJ2CCa_yDE4iXGFMU45JxNQZDiRtzAzvXv1of4yfe076CtoG-9LuA4uxiE4aLew8N3GdTvfNHDjQhwiNK0dGtP7sP0faJ3ZaTsmTsFRZZrozn50CvLZfZ7N0eLp4TG7W6BaEYUsK1VaWSelZZaRQhauSJVKOOFOKWedSTGnZWVEwnhJLS-YSYUynFMqhS2SKbjYn10H_zG42OuVH8JYNmoyjiQpkVKNFNxTnenHfnod6taErTarNzp-RUgyImiP1LF3n39EeNdcJILp-fJFs0Tl-Wwu9DL5BnaWc8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038141889</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>C038: Categorization of blood pressure by conventional versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Schwartz, G.L. ; Meissner, I. ; Whisnant, J.P. ; Sheps, S.G. ; O'Fallon, W.M. ; Covalt, J.L. ; Sicks, J.D. ; Baily, K.R. ; Wiebers, D.O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, G.L. ; Meissner, I. ; Whisnant, J.P. ; Sheps, S.G. ; O'Fallon, W.M. ; Covalt, J.L. ; Sicks, J.D. ; Baily, K.R. ; Wiebers, D.O.</creatorcontrib><description>We categorized blood pressure (BP) status (normotension [NTN] or hypertension [HTN]) in a population-based sample of 495 adults ≥45 years old by home, and office measurements of BP (conventional), and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Categorization using conventional measures of BP was determined by the average of two random-zero measurements obtained at home plus four measures obtained in the office. HTN was defined as systolic (S) BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic (D) BP ≥ 90 mm Hg (JNC VI criteria). Categorization using ABPM was determined by the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the awake period (AP), and separately on the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the asleep period (SP) (JNC VI criteria). HTN during the AP was defined as average SBP ≥ 135 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 85 mm Hg. HTN during the SP was defined as average SBP ≥ 120 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 75 mm Hg. Of 209 subjects categorized as HTN by conventional measurement, 30 (14%) were categorized as NTN by average AP BP. Of 286 subjects categorized as NTN by conventional measurement, 71 (25%) were categorized as HTN by average AP BP and 70 (24%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Of 245 subjects classified as NTN by average AP BP, 47 (19%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Compared to conventional measurement, ABPM identifies more individuals at risk from elevated BP. Conventional BP is associated with high rates of both white coat NTN (24%) and white coat HTN (14%). These observations argue for more routine use of 24-hour ABPM to determine individual risk from elevated BP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00758-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJHYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>ambulatory blood pressure ; Measurement</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.223A-223A</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, G.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meissner, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whisnant, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheps, S.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Fallon, W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covalt, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicks, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baily, K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebers, D.O.</creatorcontrib><title>C038: Categorization of blood pressure by conventional versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><description>We categorized blood pressure (BP) status (normotension [NTN] or hypertension [HTN]) in a population-based sample of 495 adults ≥45 years old by home, and office measurements of BP (conventional), and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Categorization using conventional measures of BP was determined by the average of two random-zero measurements obtained at home plus four measures obtained in the office. HTN was defined as systolic (S) BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic (D) BP ≥ 90 mm Hg (JNC VI criteria). Categorization using ABPM was determined by the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the awake period (AP), and separately on the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the asleep period (SP) (JNC VI criteria). HTN during the AP was defined as average SBP ≥ 135 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 85 mm Hg. HTN during the SP was defined as average SBP ≥ 120 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 75 mm Hg. Of 209 subjects categorized as HTN by conventional measurement, 30 (14%) were categorized as NTN by average AP BP. Of 286 subjects categorized as NTN by conventional measurement, 71 (25%) were categorized as HTN by average AP BP and 70 (24%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Of 245 subjects classified as NTN by average AP BP, 47 (19%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Compared to conventional measurement, ABPM identifies more individuals at risk from elevated BP. Conventional BP is associated with high rates of both white coat NTN (24%) and white coat HTN (14%). These observations argue for more routine use of 24-hour ABPM to determine individual risk from elevated BP.</description><subject>ambulatory blood pressure</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><issn>1879-1905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_ghDwoodokja_vElxThh4sIfhJSRtqp1tM5N2OP96OyYKnt7hfd6X974AnBN8TTDhN89YKoYE5uQS4yuMBZOIHYAJUSlBglJ2CCa_yDE4iXGFMU45JxNQZDiRtzAzvXv1of4yfe076CtoG-9LuA4uxiE4aLew8N3GdTvfNHDjQhwiNK0dGtP7sP0faJ3ZaTsmTsFRZZrozn50CvLZfZ7N0eLp4TG7W6BaEYUsK1VaWSelZZaRQhauSJVKOOFOKWedSTGnZWVEwnhJLS-YSYUynFMqhS2SKbjYn10H_zG42OuVH8JYNmoyjiQpkVKNFNxTnenHfnod6taErTarNzp-RUgyImiP1LF3n39EeNdcJILp-fJFs0Tl-Wwu9DL5BnaWc8U</recordid><startdate>200004</startdate><enddate>200004</enddate><creator>Schwartz, G.L.</creator><creator>Meissner, I.</creator><creator>Whisnant, J.P.</creator><creator>Sheps, S.G.</creator><creator>O'Fallon, W.M.</creator><creator>Covalt, J.L.</creator><creator>Sicks, J.D.</creator><creator>Baily, K.R.</creator><creator>Wiebers, D.O.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200004</creationdate><title>C038: Categorization of blood pressure by conventional versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement</title><author>Schwartz, G.L. ; Meissner, I. ; Whisnant, J.P. ; Sheps, S.G. ; O'Fallon, W.M. ; Covalt, J.L. ; Sicks, J.D. ; Baily, K.R. ; Wiebers, D.O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i919-b5d94fbe88b5b51c8cec4993616e99ebea4062dfa7356d2b6c5a479a662287bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>ambulatory blood pressure</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, G.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meissner, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whisnant, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheps, S.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Fallon, W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covalt, J.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicks, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baily, K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebers, D.O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, G.L.</au><au>Meissner, I.</au><au>Whisnant, J.P.</au><au>Sheps, S.G.</au><au>O'Fallon, W.M.</au><au>Covalt, J.L.</au><au>Sicks, J.D.</au><au>Baily, K.R.</au><au>Wiebers, D.O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>C038: Categorization of blood pressure by conventional versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><date>2000-04</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>223A</spage><epage>223A</epage><pages>223A-223A</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><eissn>1941-7225</eissn><eissn>1879-1905</eissn><coden>AJHYE6</coden><abstract>We categorized blood pressure (BP) status (normotension [NTN] or hypertension [HTN]) in a population-based sample of 495 adults ≥45 years old by home, and office measurements of BP (conventional), and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Categorization using conventional measures of BP was determined by the average of two random-zero measurements obtained at home plus four measures obtained in the office. HTN was defined as systolic (S) BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic (D) BP ≥ 90 mm Hg (JNC VI criteria). Categorization using ABPM was determined by the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the awake period (AP), and separately on the average of readings measured every 10 minutes during the asleep period (SP) (JNC VI criteria). HTN during the AP was defined as average SBP ≥ 135 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 85 mm Hg. HTN during the SP was defined as average SBP ≥ 120 mm Hg or average DBP ≥ 75 mm Hg. Of 209 subjects categorized as HTN by conventional measurement, 30 (14%) were categorized as NTN by average AP BP. Of 286 subjects categorized as NTN by conventional measurement, 71 (25%) were categorized as HTN by average AP BP and 70 (24%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Of 245 subjects classified as NTN by average AP BP, 47 (19%) were categorized as HTN by average SP BP. Compared to conventional measurement, ABPM identifies more individuals at risk from elevated BP. Conventional BP is associated with high rates of both white coat NTN (24%) and white coat HTN (14%). These observations argue for more routine use of 24-hour ABPM to determine individual risk from elevated BP.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00758-5</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-7061
ispartof American journal of hypertension, 2000-04, Vol.13 (S2), p.223A-223A
issn 0895-7061
1941-7225
1879-1905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1038141889
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects ambulatory blood pressure
Measurement
title C038: Categorization of blood pressure by conventional versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A59%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_natur&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=C038:%20Categorization%20of%20blood%20pressure%20by%20conventional%20versus%20ambulatory%20blood%20pressure%20measurement&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=Schwartz,%20G.L.&rft.date=2000-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=223A&rft.epage=223A&rft.pages=223A-223A&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1941-7225&rft.coden=AJHYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00758-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_natur%3E2753710931%3C/proquest_natur%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i919-b5d94fbe88b5b51c8cec4993616e99ebea4062dfa7356d2b6c5a479a662287bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038141889&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true