Sociologie et Islamwissenschaft: Max Weber et Ignaz Goldziher ou la «non rencontre

Claiming different conceptions of the Kulturgeschichte, Max Weber and Ignaz Goldziher have deeply marked their respective disciplines and have even played a leading role against their contemporary cultural and scientific temptations. They had mostly had the merit of safeguarding the full autonomy of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Der Islam (Berlin) 2011-01, Vol.86 (2), p.312
Main Author: Djedi, Youcef
Format: Article
Language:fre ; ger
Subjects:
Goldziher, Ignac
Islamism
Scholars
Sociology
Weber, Max (1864-1920)
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Claiming different conceptions of the Kulturgeschichte, Max Weber and Ignaz Goldziher have deeply marked their respective disciplines and have even played a leading role against their contemporary cultural and scientific temptations. They had mostly had the merit of safeguarding the full autonomy of the religious reality, mostly against Marxism (Weber) and against the New School of Islamic studies (Goldziher). But these two scholars were also distinguished by their skepticism regarding the new science, that is "sociology", that Weber wanted to strictly define among the Kulturwissenschaften and against which Goldziher wanted to protect the Islamwissenschaft. However, if Weber had sometimes lost in his approach to Islam, Goldziher, who stayed in a classic conception of categories as basic as those of "asceticism", for example, or "Beruf", had remained away from Weberian concerns of religious relationships with modernity. Obviously these two scholars would have won a lot about each other. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0021-1818
1613-0928
DOI:10.1515/ISLAM.2011.024