Loading…

Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems

Much of the literature on forward supply chain management has focused on the importance of product design. In this research, we follow this approach and apply it to manufacturing systems in a closed-loop supply chain. We consider two closed-loop manufacturing structures: parallel and mixed structure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of intelligent manufacturing 2012-12, Vol.23 (6), p.2383-2396
Main Authors: Su, Jack C. P., Lin, Yun Chiao, Lee, Victor
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493
container_end_page 2396
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2383
container_title Journal of intelligent manufacturing
container_volume 23
creator Su, Jack C. P.
Lin, Yun Chiao
Lee, Victor
description Much of the literature on forward supply chain management has focused on the importance of product design. In this research, we follow this approach and apply it to manufacturing systems in a closed-loop supply chain. We consider two closed-loop manufacturing structures: parallel and mixed structures. In the parallel structure, the assembly and disassembly are performed by separate lines, whereas in the mixed structure, they are performed by the same production line. We study effect of the use of a common component, the location of a common component, and the degree of delayed differentiation on the mean and variance of the cycle time for assembly (CTA). We find that the use of a common component significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA. The effect is pronounced when the variation in the disassembly service time is high, the structure is parallel, the utilization rate is high, the new-parts inventory level is low, and/or the return rate is high. Furthermore, placing the common component at the center of the manufacturing system yields the lowest mean and variance of the CTA. However, the effect is not statistically significant. Although increasing the degree of delayed differentiation significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA, the effectiveness is very sensitive to the process parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10845-010-0485-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1197064237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2823706931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOxDAQRS0EEsvCB9BFojbMxK-YDq14SSvRQG05jo2CkjjYSbF_T1ahoKGa5p6rO4eQa4RbBFB3GaHiggICBV4Jiidkg0KVtEIuTskGtJBUCBTn5CLnLwDQlcQNud_FfoyDH6bCxb6Pg-3a6VC0Q-G6mH1DuxjHorfDHKyb5tQOn0U-5Mn3-ZKcBdtlf_V7t-Tj6fF990L3b8-vu4c9dQzlRD2qygdeKssadNYyXUpW8yooXqvaCullA1zpRtbgtGKhFsCZ06FCqRjXbEtu1t4xxe_Z58l8xTktQ7NB1AokL5laUrimXIo5Jx_MmNrepoNBMEdFZlVkFkXmqMjgwpQrk8fjYz79af4X-gGAqWir</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1197064237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Su, Jack C. P. ; Lin, Yun Chiao ; Lee, Victor</creator><creatorcontrib>Su, Jack C. P. ; Lin, Yun Chiao ; Lee, Victor</creatorcontrib><description>Much of the literature on forward supply chain management has focused on the importance of product design. In this research, we follow this approach and apply it to manufacturing systems in a closed-loop supply chain. We consider two closed-loop manufacturing structures: parallel and mixed structures. In the parallel structure, the assembly and disassembly are performed by separate lines, whereas in the mixed structure, they are performed by the same production line. We study effect of the use of a common component, the location of a common component, and the degree of delayed differentiation on the mean and variance of the cycle time for assembly (CTA). We find that the use of a common component significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA. The effect is pronounced when the variation in the disassembly service time is high, the structure is parallel, the utilization rate is high, the new-parts inventory level is low, and/or the return rate is high. Furthermore, placing the common component at the center of the manufacturing system yields the lowest mean and variance of the CTA. However, the effect is not statistically significant. Although increasing the degree of delayed differentiation significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA, the effectiveness is very sensitive to the process parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10845-010-0485-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business and Management ; Control ; Environmental protection ; Inventory ; Inventory control ; Literature reviews ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing execution systems ; Mechatronics ; Processes ; Production ; Production planning ; Robotics ; Simulation ; Studies ; Supply chain management</subject><ispartof>Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2012-12, Vol.23 (6), p.2383-2396</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1197064237/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1197064237?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Su, Jack C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yun Chiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Victor</creatorcontrib><title>Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems</title><title>Journal of intelligent manufacturing</title><addtitle>J Intell Manuf</addtitle><description>Much of the literature on forward supply chain management has focused on the importance of product design. In this research, we follow this approach and apply it to manufacturing systems in a closed-loop supply chain. We consider two closed-loop manufacturing structures: parallel and mixed structures. In the parallel structure, the assembly and disassembly are performed by separate lines, whereas in the mixed structure, they are performed by the same production line. We study effect of the use of a common component, the location of a common component, and the degree of delayed differentiation on the mean and variance of the cycle time for assembly (CTA). We find that the use of a common component significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA. The effect is pronounced when the variation in the disassembly service time is high, the structure is parallel, the utilization rate is high, the new-parts inventory level is low, and/or the return rate is high. Furthermore, placing the common component at the center of the manufacturing system yields the lowest mean and variance of the CTA. However, the effect is not statistically significant. Although increasing the degree of delayed differentiation significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA, the effectiveness is very sensitive to the process parameters.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Inventory control</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing execution systems</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><issn>0956-5515</issn><issn>1572-8145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOxDAQRS0EEsvCB9BFojbMxK-YDq14SSvRQG05jo2CkjjYSbF_T1ahoKGa5p6rO4eQa4RbBFB3GaHiggICBV4Jiidkg0KVtEIuTskGtJBUCBTn5CLnLwDQlcQNud_FfoyDH6bCxb6Pg-3a6VC0Q-G6mH1DuxjHorfDHKyb5tQOn0U-5Mn3-ZKcBdtlf_V7t-Tj6fF990L3b8-vu4c9dQzlRD2qygdeKssadNYyXUpW8yooXqvaCullA1zpRtbgtGKhFsCZ06FCqRjXbEtu1t4xxe_Z58l8xTktQ7NB1AokL5laUrimXIo5Jx_MmNrepoNBMEdFZlVkFkXmqMjgwpQrk8fjYz79af4X-gGAqWir</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Su, Jack C. P.</creator><creator>Lin, Yun Chiao</creator><creator>Lee, Victor</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems</title><author>Su, Jack C. P. ; Lin, Yun Chiao ; Lee, Victor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Inventory control</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing execution systems</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Su, Jack C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yun Chiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Victor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intelligent manufacturing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Su, Jack C. P.</au><au>Lin, Yun Chiao</au><au>Lee, Victor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intelligent manufacturing</jtitle><stitle>J Intell Manuf</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2383</spage><epage>2396</epage><pages>2383-2396</pages><issn>0956-5515</issn><eissn>1572-8145</eissn><abstract>Much of the literature on forward supply chain management has focused on the importance of product design. In this research, we follow this approach and apply it to manufacturing systems in a closed-loop supply chain. We consider two closed-loop manufacturing structures: parallel and mixed structures. In the parallel structure, the assembly and disassembly are performed by separate lines, whereas in the mixed structure, they are performed by the same production line. We study effect of the use of a common component, the location of a common component, and the degree of delayed differentiation on the mean and variance of the cycle time for assembly (CTA). We find that the use of a common component significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA. The effect is pronounced when the variation in the disassembly service time is high, the structure is parallel, the utilization rate is high, the new-parts inventory level is low, and/or the return rate is high. Furthermore, placing the common component at the center of the manufacturing system yields the lowest mean and variance of the CTA. However, the effect is not statistically significant. Although increasing the degree of delayed differentiation significantly reduces the mean and variance of the CTA, the effectiveness is very sensitive to the process parameters.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10845-010-0485-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-5515
ispartof Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2012-12, Vol.23 (6), p.2383-2396
issn 0956-5515
1572-8145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1197064237
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Analysis
Business and Management
Control
Environmental protection
Inventory
Inventory control
Literature reviews
Machines
Manufacturing
Manufacturing execution systems
Mechatronics
Processes
Production
Production planning
Robotics
Simulation
Studies
Supply chain management
title Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Component%20commonality%20in%20closed-loop%20manufacturing%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intelligent%20manufacturing&rft.au=Su,%20Jack%20C.%20P.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2383&rft.epage=2396&rft.pages=2383-2396&rft.issn=0956-5515&rft.eissn=1572-8145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10845-010-0485-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2823706931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e178ef427a3d1caa39263b48f74b7ba56e6d0479d6b0c973fb5043c9f81673493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1197064237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true