Commercial Real Estate Returns: An Anatomy of Smoothing in Asset and Index Returns

In this article, we investigate the commonly used autoregressive filter method of adjusting appraisal‐based real estate returns to correct for the perceived biases induced in the appraisal process. Many articles have been written on appraisal smoothing but remarkably few have considered the relation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Real estate economics 2012-12, Vol.40 (4), p.637-661
Main Authors: Bond, Shaun A., Hwang, Soosung, Marcato, Gianluca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assets
Commercial real estate
Indexes
Real estate appraisal
Regression analysis
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23
container_end_page 661
container_issue 4
container_start_page 637
container_title Real estate economics
container_volume 40
creator Bond, Shaun A.
Hwang, Soosung
Marcato, Gianluca
description In this article, we investigate the commonly used autoregressive filter method of adjusting appraisal‐based real estate returns to correct for the perceived biases induced in the appraisal process. Many articles have been written on appraisal smoothing but remarkably few have considered the relationship between smoothing at the individual property level and the amount of persistence in the aggregate appraisal‐based index. To investigate this issue we analyze a large sample of appraisal data at the individual property level from the Investment Property Databank. We find that commonly used unsmoothing estimates at the index level overstate the extent of smoothing that takes place at the individual property level. There is also strong support for an ARFIMA representation of appraisal returns at the index level and an ARMA model at the individual property level.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00327.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1266246884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2856328601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1PgzAUhonRxDn9DyReg6elFDDxYiG4LVk0mR-7bAocFBwwWxbZv7eI7tqm6XnTnqcneSzLJuASs24ql_gMHE5p5FIgxAXwaOD2J9bk-HBqMoTghJzCuXWhdQUAJApgYq3jtq5RZaXc2ms0R6I72aHJ3V41-taeNWbLrq0PdlvYT3Xbdu9l82aX5l5r7GzZ5PayybH_Yy6ts0JuNV791qn1cp88xwtn9ThfxrOVkzFOA4cxDxCAQYaMhmngSwYp89M8z7kkoZTEQxJkPk2zHGiAuS8RI-JTlB5LC-pNrevx351qP_eoO1G1Zr4ZKQjlnDIehsx0hWNXplqtFRZip8paqoMgIAaDohKDKDGIEoNB8WNQ9Aa9G9GvcouHf3NinSSxSYZ3Rr7UHfZHXqoPwQMv8MXmYS4Wr3E8jzZceN43sl-FAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1266246884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commercial Real Estate Returns: An Anatomy of Smoothing in Asset and Index Returns</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Bond, Shaun A. ; Hwang, Soosung ; Marcato, Gianluca</creator><creatorcontrib>Bond, Shaun A. ; Hwang, Soosung ; Marcato, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we investigate the commonly used autoregressive filter method of adjusting appraisal‐based real estate returns to correct for the perceived biases induced in the appraisal process. Many articles have been written on appraisal smoothing but remarkably few have considered the relationship between smoothing at the individual property level and the amount of persistence in the aggregate appraisal‐based index. To investigate this issue we analyze a large sample of appraisal data at the individual property level from the Investment Property Databank. We find that commonly used unsmoothing estimates at the index level overstate the extent of smoothing that takes place at the individual property level. There is also strong support for an ARFIMA representation of appraisal returns at the index level and an ARMA model at the individual property level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-8620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00327.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Assets ; Commercial real estate ; Indexes ; Real estate appraisal ; Regression analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Real estate economics, 2012-12, Vol.40 (4), p.637-661</ispartof><rights>2012 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Real Estate and Urban Economic Association Winter 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bond, Shaun A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Soosung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcato, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><title>Commercial Real Estate Returns: An Anatomy of Smoothing in Asset and Index Returns</title><title>Real estate economics</title><description>In this article, we investigate the commonly used autoregressive filter method of adjusting appraisal‐based real estate returns to correct for the perceived biases induced in the appraisal process. Many articles have been written on appraisal smoothing but remarkably few have considered the relationship between smoothing at the individual property level and the amount of persistence in the aggregate appraisal‐based index. To investigate this issue we analyze a large sample of appraisal data at the individual property level from the Investment Property Databank. We find that commonly used unsmoothing estimates at the index level overstate the extent of smoothing that takes place at the individual property level. There is also strong support for an ARFIMA representation of appraisal returns at the index level and an ARMA model at the individual property level.</description><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Commercial real estate</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Real estate appraisal</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1080-8620</issn><issn>1540-6229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1PgzAUhonRxDn9DyReg6elFDDxYiG4LVk0mR-7bAocFBwwWxbZv7eI7tqm6XnTnqcneSzLJuASs24ql_gMHE5p5FIgxAXwaOD2J9bk-HBqMoTghJzCuXWhdQUAJApgYq3jtq5RZaXc2ms0R6I72aHJ3V41-taeNWbLrq0PdlvYT3Xbdu9l82aX5l5r7GzZ5PayybH_Yy6ts0JuNV791qn1cp88xwtn9ThfxrOVkzFOA4cxDxCAQYaMhmngSwYp89M8z7kkoZTEQxJkPk2zHGiAuS8RI-JTlB5LC-pNrevx351qP_eoO1G1Zr4ZKQjlnDIehsx0hWNXplqtFRZip8paqoMgIAaDohKDKDGIEoNB8WNQ9Aa9G9GvcouHf3NinSSxSYZ3Rr7UHfZHXqoPwQMv8MXmYS4Wr3E8jzZceN43sl-FAw</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Bond, Shaun A.</creator><creator>Hwang, Soosung</creator><creator>Marcato, Gianluca</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Commercial Real Estate Returns: An Anatomy of Smoothing in Asset and Index Returns</title><author>Bond, Shaun A. ; Hwang, Soosung ; Marcato, Gianluca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Commercial real estate</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Real estate appraisal</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bond, Shaun A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Soosung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcato, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Real estate economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bond, Shaun A.</au><au>Hwang, Soosung</au><au>Marcato, Gianluca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commercial Real Estate Returns: An Anatomy of Smoothing in Asset and Index Returns</atitle><jtitle>Real estate economics</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>661</epage><pages>637-661</pages><issn>1080-8620</issn><eissn>1540-6229</eissn><abstract>In this article, we investigate the commonly used autoregressive filter method of adjusting appraisal‐based real estate returns to correct for the perceived biases induced in the appraisal process. Many articles have been written on appraisal smoothing but remarkably few have considered the relationship between smoothing at the individual property level and the amount of persistence in the aggregate appraisal‐based index. To investigate this issue we analyze a large sample of appraisal data at the individual property level from the Investment Property Databank. We find that commonly used unsmoothing estimates at the index level overstate the extent of smoothing that takes place at the individual property level. There is also strong support for an ARFIMA representation of appraisal returns at the index level and an ARMA model at the individual property level.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00327.x</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-8620
ispartof Real estate economics, 2012-12, Vol.40 (4), p.637-661
issn 1080-8620
1540-6229
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1266246884
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Assets
Commercial real estate
Indexes
Real estate appraisal
Regression analysis
Studies
title Commercial Real Estate Returns: An Anatomy of Smoothing in Asset and Index Returns
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commercial%20Real%20Estate%20Returns:%20An%20Anatomy%20of%20Smoothing%20in%20Asset%20and%20Index%20Returns&rft.jtitle=Real%20estate%20economics&rft.au=Bond,%20Shaun%20A.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=661&rft.pages=637-661&rft.issn=1080-8620&rft.eissn=1540-6229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00327.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2856328601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4627-4430e0040ce428b75a40b45bddd6a18aa13e17c52bcd027ed5aee9152ea34bf23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1266246884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true