Coping Style Following Acute Stress in Competitive Sport

• Published in: The Journal of social psychology 2000-12, Vol.140 (6), p.751-773
• Main Authors: Anshel, Mark H., Williams, L. R. T., Williams, Sheila M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute Disease; acute stress; Adaptation, Psychological; Adolescent; Adult; Applied psychology; Athletes; athletics; Australia; Avoidance Learning; Biological and medical sciences; Competitive Behavior; Competitive sports; coping; coping inventory; Coping style; Emotions; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Male; Models, Psychological; Personality. Affectivity; Problem Solving; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Psychometrics; Social research; sport; Sports - psychology; Sports. Leisure; Stress; Stress, Psychological - prevention & control; Stress, Psychological - psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Transactional Analysis; United States
• ISSN: 0022-4545; 1940-1183
• DOI: 10.1080/00224540009600515

The purpose of this study was to ascertain coping styles among competitive athletes in response to various acute stressors. Specifically, the authors used a 134-item survey to measure approach and avoidance coping styles, with task-focused and emotion-focused coping tendencies nested hierarchically as subdimensions under each. Australian and U.S. college-aged participants indicated the extent to which they used approach, avoidance, task-focused, and emotion-focused coping strategies (a 4-factor model) in response to selected acute stressors experienced during sport competition. The authors computed confirmatory factor analysis to test the theoretically driven model. The criterion loading of .30 and above for each of the factors reduced the survey to 65 items. Findings indicated stronger links between the 2 approach constructs of task- and emotion-focused coping than between the 2 avoidance constructs of those subdimensions. The goodness-of-fit indices for the 4-factor model were 0.58 and 0.57 for Australian and U.S. samples, respectively, and .71 overall. Concomitant low correlations between the 2 approach (0.18) and the 2 avoidance dimensions (0.43) reflected relatively high residuals between stressors. In general, psychometric analyses suggest that coping style may be more prevalent in some situations than others, lending partial support for the transactional model of coping.