Loading…

Firm entry, trade, and welfare in Zipf's world

Firm size follows Zipf's Law, a very fat-tailed distribution that implies a few large firms account for a disproportionate share of overall economic activity. This distribution of firm size is crucial for evaluating the welfare impact of economic policies such as barriers to entry or trade libe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international economics 2013-03, Vol.89 (2), p.283-296
Main Authors: di Giovanni, Julian, Levchenko, Andrei A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Firm size follows Zipf's Law, a very fat-tailed distribution that implies a few large firms account for a disproportionate share of overall economic activity. This distribution of firm size is crucial for evaluating the welfare impact of economic policies such as barriers to entry or trade liberalization. Using a multi-country model of production and trade calibrated to the observed distribution of firm size, we show that the welfare impact of high entry costs is small. In the sample of the 50 largest economies in the world, a reduction in entry costs all the way to the U.S. level leads to an average increase in welfare of only 3.25%. In addition, when the firm size distribution follows Zipf's Law, the welfare impact of the extensive margin of trade – newly imported goods at or near the exporting cutoff – is negligible. The extensive margin of imports accounts for only about 5.2% of the total gains from a 10% reduction in trade barriers in our model. This is because under Zipf's Law, the large, infra-marginal firms have a far greater welfare impact than the much smaller firms that comprise the extensive margin in these policy experiments. The distribution of firm size matters for these results: in a counterfactual model economy that does not exhibit Zipf's Law the gains from a reduction in fixed entry barriers are an order of magnitude larger, while the gains from a reduction in variable trade costs are an order of magnitude smaller. ► Firm size follows Zipf's Law, a very fat-tailed distribution. ► This distribution is crucial for evaluating the welfare impact of economic policies. ► In a model calibrated to Zipf's Law the welfare impact of high entry costs is small. ► Under Zipf's Law, the welfare impact of the extensive margin of trade is negligible.
ISSN:0022-1996
1873-0353
DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.08.002