Loading…

Time‐Energy Budget of the Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris Pusilla at Barrow, Alaska

The time—activity budget of breeding Calidris pusilla was studied at Barrow, Alaska USA, in 1973 by observing several individually marked birds. Feeding, incubating and young—attending were the most time—consuming activities: °70% and 80% of the time was spent feeding by the female during laying per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 1979-08, Vol.60 (4), p.783-799
Main Authors: Ashkenazie, Shoshana, Safriel, Uriel N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2793-1ce543ab1a7efbf4844025041070cb2a1481c8cabc7936e98c3dda46ae3208d43
cites
container_end_page 799
container_issue 4
container_start_page 783
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 60
creator Ashkenazie, Shoshana
Safriel, Uriel N.
description The time—activity budget of breeding Calidris pusilla was studied at Barrow, Alaska USA, in 1973 by observing several individually marked birds. Feeding, incubating and young—attending were the most time—consuming activities: °70% and 80% of the time was spent feeding by the female during laying period by both sexes prior to southbound migration, respectively. Up to 50% of the time was spent incubating or attending young during the incubation the young—attending periods. The time—activity budget was converted into an estimate of energy requirements by using available estimates for energetic cost of activities. Although both environmental conditions and activity patterns changed throughout the season, the daily energetic cost fluctuated between only 159 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 222 kJ/d during the laying stage for the female, and between 155 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 167 kJ/d during the territorial stage for the male. But because females leave the area about the time of hatching, a female requires less energy from the tundra than a male; on the average, °7.1 x 10³ and 8.0 x 10³ kJ were required during the whole season by female and male, respectively. Energy uptake was estimated by: (a) using available data on diet composition, the energy content of prey items and their digestibility, and (b) combining them with observed feeding rates and estimated capture rates. The resultant energy budget was generally negative for the whole season and, indeed, female weights declined significantly. We conclude that either energy uptake was underestimated or the birds rely heavily upon resources obtained at wintering grounds and during migration prior to arrival at Barrow. We suggest that females, having an average daily energy requirement 15° higher than males, and entering the young—attending stage with an accumulated energy deficit, increase their fitness by deserting to better feeding grounds rather than staying with the young after they hatch. Thus females enhance their own survival to the next season. A preliminary comparison of the time—activity budget of C. pusilla with that of two rather unrelated species revealed a remarkable similarity in the pattern of time allocation.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1936615
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1296439360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1936615</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1936615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2793-1ce543ab1a7efbf4844025041070cb2a1481c8cabc7936e98c3dda46ae3208d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9Kw0AQxhdRsFbxEVxQ8GJ0_yWbPbah_oGCQtuDp2WSbGpq2sTdhNKbj-Az-iSupFedy8zh930zfIPQOSW3jBN5RxWPIhoeoIGfVKCoJIdoQAhlgYrC-BidOLcivqiIB2gxL9fm-_NrsjF2ucPjLl-aFtcFbt8Mnpl12UC1htbkeAabvCkbY3ECVZnb0uGXzpVVBRhaPAZr6-0NHlXg3uEUHRVQOXO270O0uJ_Mk8dg-vzwlIymQcak4gHNTCg4pBSkKdJCxEIQFhJBiSRZysBfSLM4gzTzdGRUnPE8BxGB4YzEueBDdNn7Nrb-6Ixr9aru7Mav1JSpSHAvI5667qnM1s5ZU-jGlmuwO02J_s1M7zPzJOvJbVmZ3V-YniSvVEkVESFj7kVXvWjl2tr-433RYwXUGpY-P72YMUIj_wlJJZf8B7UbgGI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296439360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time‐Energy Budget of the Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris Pusilla at Barrow, Alaska</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Ashkenazie, Shoshana ; Safriel, Uriel N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashkenazie, Shoshana ; Safriel, Uriel N.</creatorcontrib><description>The time—activity budget of breeding Calidris pusilla was studied at Barrow, Alaska USA, in 1973 by observing several individually marked birds. Feeding, incubating and young—attending were the most time—consuming activities: °70% and 80% of the time was spent feeding by the female during laying period by both sexes prior to southbound migration, respectively. Up to 50% of the time was spent incubating or attending young during the incubation the young—attending periods. The time—activity budget was converted into an estimate of energy requirements by using available estimates for energetic cost of activities. Although both environmental conditions and activity patterns changed throughout the season, the daily energetic cost fluctuated between only 159 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 222 kJ/d during the laying stage for the female, and between 155 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 167 kJ/d during the territorial stage for the male. But because females leave the area about the time of hatching, a female requires less energy from the tundra than a male; on the average, °7.1 x 10³ and 8.0 x 10³ kJ were required during the whole season by female and male, respectively. Energy uptake was estimated by: (a) using available data on diet composition, the energy content of prey items and their digestibility, and (b) combining them with observed feeding rates and estimated capture rates. The resultant energy budget was generally negative for the whole season and, indeed, female weights declined significantly. We conclude that either energy uptake was underestimated or the birds rely heavily upon resources obtained at wintering grounds and during migration prior to arrival at Barrow. We suggest that females, having an average daily energy requirement 15° higher than males, and entering the young—attending stage with an accumulated energy deficit, increase their fitness by deserting to better feeding grounds rather than staying with the young after they hatch. Thus females enhance their own survival to the next season. A preliminary comparison of the time—activity budget of C. pusilla with that of two rather unrelated species revealed a remarkable similarity in the pattern of time allocation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1936615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn, N.Y., etc: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Aerial locomotion ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding seasons ; Cost estimates ; Energy budgets ; Energy requirements ; Female animals ; Incubation ; Male animals</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1979-08, Vol.60 (4), p.783-799</ispartof><rights>Coopyright 1979 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1979 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2793-1ce543ab1a7efbf4844025041070cb2a1481c8cabc7936e98c3dda46ae3208d43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1936615$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1936615$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashkenazie, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safriel, Uriel N.</creatorcontrib><title>Time‐Energy Budget of the Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris Pusilla at Barrow, Alaska</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>The time—activity budget of breeding Calidris pusilla was studied at Barrow, Alaska USA, in 1973 by observing several individually marked birds. Feeding, incubating and young—attending were the most time—consuming activities: °70% and 80% of the time was spent feeding by the female during laying period by both sexes prior to southbound migration, respectively. Up to 50% of the time was spent incubating or attending young during the incubation the young—attending periods. The time—activity budget was converted into an estimate of energy requirements by using available estimates for energetic cost of activities. Although both environmental conditions and activity patterns changed throughout the season, the daily energetic cost fluctuated between only 159 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 222 kJ/d during the laying stage for the female, and between 155 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 167 kJ/d during the territorial stage for the male. But because females leave the area about the time of hatching, a female requires less energy from the tundra than a male; on the average, °7.1 x 10³ and 8.0 x 10³ kJ were required during the whole season by female and male, respectively. Energy uptake was estimated by: (a) using available data on diet composition, the energy content of prey items and their digestibility, and (b) combining them with observed feeding rates and estimated capture rates. The resultant energy budget was generally negative for the whole season and, indeed, female weights declined significantly. We conclude that either energy uptake was underestimated or the birds rely heavily upon resources obtained at wintering grounds and during migration prior to arrival at Barrow. We suggest that females, having an average daily energy requirement 15° higher than males, and entering the young—attending stage with an accumulated energy deficit, increase their fitness by deserting to better feeding grounds rather than staying with the young after they hatch. Thus females enhance their own survival to the next season. A preliminary comparison of the time—activity budget of C. pusilla with that of two rather unrelated species revealed a remarkable similarity in the pattern of time allocation.</description><subject>Aerial locomotion</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Energy budgets</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9Kw0AQxhdRsFbxEVxQ8GJ0_yWbPbah_oGCQtuDp2WSbGpq2sTdhNKbj-Az-iSupFedy8zh930zfIPQOSW3jBN5RxWPIhoeoIGfVKCoJIdoQAhlgYrC-BidOLcivqiIB2gxL9fm-_NrsjF2ucPjLl-aFtcFbt8Mnpl12UC1htbkeAabvCkbY3ECVZnb0uGXzpVVBRhaPAZr6-0NHlXg3uEUHRVQOXO270O0uJ_Mk8dg-vzwlIymQcak4gHNTCg4pBSkKdJCxEIQFhJBiSRZysBfSLM4gzTzdGRUnPE8BxGB4YzEueBDdNn7Nrb-6Ixr9aru7Mav1JSpSHAvI5667qnM1s5ZU-jGlmuwO02J_s1M7zPzJOvJbVmZ3V-YniSvVEkVESFj7kVXvWjl2tr-433RYwXUGpY-P72YMUIj_wlJJZf8B7UbgGI</recordid><startdate>197908</startdate><enddate>197908</enddate><creator>Ashkenazie, Shoshana</creator><creator>Safriel, Uriel N.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197908</creationdate><title>Time‐Energy Budget of the Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris Pusilla at Barrow, Alaska</title><author>Ashkenazie, Shoshana ; Safriel, Uriel N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2793-1ce543ab1a7efbf4844025041070cb2a1481c8cabc7936e98c3dda46ae3208d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Aerial locomotion</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Energy budgets</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashkenazie, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safriel, Uriel N.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashkenazie, Shoshana</au><au>Safriel, Uriel N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time‐Energy Budget of the Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris Pusilla at Barrow, Alaska</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1979-08</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>783-799</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>The time—activity budget of breeding Calidris pusilla was studied at Barrow, Alaska USA, in 1973 by observing several individually marked birds. Feeding, incubating and young—attending were the most time—consuming activities: °70% and 80% of the time was spent feeding by the female during laying period by both sexes prior to southbound migration, respectively. Up to 50% of the time was spent incubating or attending young during the incubation the young—attending periods. The time—activity budget was converted into an estimate of energy requirements by using available estimates for energetic cost of activities. Although both environmental conditions and activity patterns changed throughout the season, the daily energetic cost fluctuated between only 159 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 222 kJ/d during the laying stage for the female, and between 155 kJ/d during the prelaying stage and 167 kJ/d during the territorial stage for the male. But because females leave the area about the time of hatching, a female requires less energy from the tundra than a male; on the average, °7.1 x 10³ and 8.0 x 10³ kJ were required during the whole season by female and male, respectively. Energy uptake was estimated by: (a) using available data on diet composition, the energy content of prey items and their digestibility, and (b) combining them with observed feeding rates and estimated capture rates. The resultant energy budget was generally negative for the whole season and, indeed, female weights declined significantly. We conclude that either energy uptake was underestimated or the birds rely heavily upon resources obtained at wintering grounds and during migration prior to arrival at Barrow. We suggest that females, having an average daily energy requirement 15° higher than males, and entering the young—attending stage with an accumulated energy deficit, increase their fitness by deserting to better feeding grounds rather than staying with the young after they hatch. Thus females enhance their own survival to the next season. A preliminary comparison of the time—activity budget of C. pusilla with that of two rather unrelated species revealed a remarkable similarity in the pattern of time allocation.</abstract><cop>Brooklyn, N.Y., etc</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1936615</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1979-08, Vol.60 (4), p.783-799
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1296439360
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Aerial locomotion
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding seasons
Cost estimates
Energy budgets
Energy requirements
Female animals
Incubation
Male animals
title Time‐Energy Budget of the Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris Pusilla at Barrow, Alaska
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%E2%80%90Energy%20Budget%20of%20the%20Semipalmated%20Sandpiper%20Calidris%20Pusilla%20at%20Barrow,%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Ashkenazie,%20Shoshana&rft.date=1979-08&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=783-799&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1936615&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1936615%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2793-1ce543ab1a7efbf4844025041070cb2a1481c8cabc7936e98c3dda46ae3208d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296439360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1936615&rfr_iscdi=true