Federal Tax Reform

• Published in: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1968-09, Vol.379 (1), p.102-113
• Main Author: Smith, Dan Throop
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Capital gains; Capital income; Corporate income taxes; Corporations; Income taxes; Property taxes; Tax reform; Taxation; Taxation and Democracy; Transfer taxes; Value added taxes
• ISSN: 0002-7162; 1552-3349
• DOI: 10.1177/000271626837900112

Proposals for tax reform must be appraised against the subjective criteria of fairness and social policy regarding redistribution of income and wealth and the objective criteria of steady economic growth and administrative simplicity. Controversy over the individual income tax centers on the tax base and the rate structure. A fundamental change would involve the adoption of a comprehensive income tax base, including not only all capital gains but also various items of imputed income and even gifts and bequests. This concept of income breaks down the distinction between capital and income, would conflict with accepted concepts in all other fields, and would also have undesirable economic effects. High marginal individual income tax rates produce little revenue but distort decisions on personal activity and investment. Though some progression in rates is almost universally accepted as fair, confusion about the effect of rate changes at different levels has led to excessive top rates. Estate and gift taxes might be combined into a single progressive transfer tax, but this would discourage gifts before death and hence be undesirable. The incidence of the corporation income tax is not known, but theorists and businessmen increasingly believe that it is shifted forward. As such, it is a capricious excise tax, and it also holds a price umbrella over less efficient producers. Partial substitution of a value-added tax would be a major reform. Under present international agreements, it could also improve the balance of payments.