Loading…

MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING

This experiment investigated the effect of channel load in a one-, two- and three-meter vigilance task. Also investigated was the effect of training under one of the three-channel load conditions when subjects were later transferred to a two-channel condition. Subjects monitored a voltmeter display...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics 1964-10, Vol.7 (4), p.453-460
Main Author: WIENER, EARL L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773
container_end_page 460
container_issue 4
container_start_page 453
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 7
creator WIENER, EARL L.
description This experiment investigated the effect of channel load in a one-, two- and three-meter vigilance task. Also investigated was the effect of training under one of the three-channel load conditions when subjects were later transferred to a two-channel condition. Subjects monitored a voltmeter display for 64 minutes. Results showed that the overall performance of the two- and three-channel groups was virtually identical, and considerably inferior to the single-channel group in the initial session. A time decrement was exhibited by all three groups. In the second session when all subjects monitored two channels, no significant differences between groups wore found. The results are discussed in terms of time-sharing load on the monitor, and implications for equipment design and training.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140136408930762
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1301233398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1301233398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQHwZ-FxNctP8AV9GqVuh60S255C2CWx07Uw2ZN_ejPkmPl0O9_zOgYPQI8EvBEv8ijFhmABnWCrAgtMrNIqSJ6lk4hqNzv8kGtQtugthGyUQRUfoabEuV8VHmU-y-bSq8nKyWFbFavlZVLN7dONMF-zD7x2j9Xu-yuZJuZwV2bRMGqD8kLSCOCeYZbTmAEzQtLG1qWvZpKK2DtpYRpXBjErF6rblXArV4BS31jghBIzR8yV374evow0HvR2Ovo-VmkBkAUDJ6CIXV-OHELx1eu83O-NPmmB93kD_2SAybxdm07vB78z34LtWH8ypG7zzpm82QcP_-A-yv1wz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301233398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Engineering, Computing &amp; Technology Archive</source><creator>WIENER, EARL L.</creator><creatorcontrib>WIENER, EARL L.</creatorcontrib><description>This experiment investigated the effect of channel load in a one-, two- and three-meter vigilance task. Also investigated was the effect of training under one of the three-channel load conditions when subjects were later transferred to a two-channel condition. Subjects monitored a voltmeter display for 64 minutes. Results showed that the overall performance of the two- and three-channel groups was virtually identical, and considerably inferior to the single-channel group in the initial session. A time decrement was exhibited by all three groups. In the second session when all subjects monitored two channels, no significant differences between groups wore found. The results are discussed in terms of time-sharing load on the monitor, and implications for equipment design and training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140136408930762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>Ergonomics, 1964-10, Vol.7 (4), p.453-460</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1964</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140136408930762$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140136408930762$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59901,60690</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>WIENER, EARL L.</creatorcontrib><title>MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING</title><title>Ergonomics</title><description>This experiment investigated the effect of channel load in a one-, two- and three-meter vigilance task. Also investigated was the effect of training under one of the three-channel load conditions when subjects were later transferred to a two-channel condition. Subjects monitored a voltmeter display for 64 minutes. Results showed that the overall performance of the two- and three-channel groups was virtually identical, and considerably inferior to the single-channel group in the initial session. A time decrement was exhibited by all three groups. In the second session when all subjects monitored two channels, no significant differences between groups wore found. The results are discussed in terms of time-sharing load on the monitor, and implications for equipment design and training.</description><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1964</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQHwZ-FxNctP8AV9GqVuh60S255C2CWx07Uw2ZN_ejPkmPl0O9_zOgYPQI8EvBEv8ijFhmABnWCrAgtMrNIqSJ6lk4hqNzv8kGtQtugthGyUQRUfoabEuV8VHmU-y-bSq8nKyWFbFavlZVLN7dONMF-zD7x2j9Xu-yuZJuZwV2bRMGqD8kLSCOCeYZbTmAEzQtLG1qWvZpKK2DtpYRpXBjErF6rblXArV4BS31jghBIzR8yV374evow0HvR2Ovo-VmkBkAUDJ6CIXV-OHELx1eu83O-NPmmB93kD_2SAybxdm07vB78z34LtWH8ypG7zzpm82QcP_-A-yv1wz</recordid><startdate>19641001</startdate><enddate>19641001</enddate><creator>WIENER, EARL L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19641001</creationdate><title>MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING</title><author>WIENER, EARL L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1964</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WIENER, EARL L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WIENER, EARL L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><date>1964-10-01</date><risdate>1964</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>453-460</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>This experiment investigated the effect of channel load in a one-, two- and three-meter vigilance task. Also investigated was the effect of training under one of the three-channel load conditions when subjects were later transferred to a two-channel condition. Subjects monitored a voltmeter display for 64 minutes. Results showed that the overall performance of the two- and three-channel groups was virtually identical, and considerably inferior to the single-channel group in the initial session. A time decrement was exhibited by all three groups. In the second session when all subjects monitored two channels, no significant differences between groups wore found. The results are discussed in terms of time-sharing load on the monitor, and implications for equipment design and training.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00140136408930762</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 1964-10, Vol.7 (4), p.453-460
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1301233398
source Taylor & Francis Engineering, Computing & Technology Archive
title MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MULTIPLE%20CHANNEL%20MONITORING&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=WIENER,%20EARL%20L.&rft.date=1964-10-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=453-460&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140136408930762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1301233398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d71ff74e42b6334725cebabb8c57bef3d00129a042894bdd66879c050deaf7773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301233398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true