Loading…

The Independent Voter in 1952: A Study of Pittsfield, Massachusetts

A challenging problem for both the student of political behavior and the practical politician is the self-labeled independent voter. Much of the research on what appears to be an increasingly larger segment of the American electorate has been either historically or sociologically oriented in the sen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American political science review 1953-09, Vol.47 (3), p.805-810
Main Author: Hastings, Philip K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8046a1135cc81e63c2e7dec89d3be3c9eeab0761e96cd6cf703811f29b830bed3
cites
container_end_page 810
container_issue 3
container_start_page 805
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 47
creator Hastings, Philip K.
description A challenging problem for both the student of political behavior and the practical politician is the self-labeled independent voter. Much of the research on what appears to be an increasingly larger segment of the American electorate has been either historically or sociologically oriented in the sense that it has focused on trend studies of the voting pattern of this group or has attempted to describe it in terms of its objective characteristics. Frequently, by inference at least, we are led to believe that the future political behavior of the independent can be anticipated if we have information of the above nature. The central purpose of this article is to present evidence favoring the hypothesis that the political behavior of the independent is more closely related to relevant psychological variables, such as his political perceptions, than to his past voting habits or his objective attributes. During the period from April through November of 1952, the author directed a detailed study of the political opinions and behavior of the residents of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, a city of approximately 53,000 people. The research methods employed in the project included a systematic historic analysis of the community, a series of four public opinion surveys, content analysis of some of the mass media of communication, and a panel study. The first poll took place late in the spring of 1952, the second in August, and the third and fourth were carried out just prior to and immediately following the November elections. The panel members, coming from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds, were interviewed periodically throughout the course of the project.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1952907
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1304775472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_1952907</cupid><jstor_id>1952907</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1952907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8046a1135cc81e63c2e7dec89d3be3c9eeab0761e96cd6cf703811f29b830bed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p_gsBBRGsJk2TtL6NoXOwzV_T15AmV9c515mk4P57OzpEfPAlR44P3zsOoWNKLmNG5BXNeJwRuYM6lDMZ8Sxhu6hDCGER4TzZRwfez5svoSTtoP50Bni4tLCC5lkG_FoFcLhc4k3ONe7h51DbNa4K_FCG4IsSFvYCj7X32sxqD03vEO0VeuHhaFu76OX2Ztq_i0b3g2G_N4oM40mIUpIITSnjxqQUBDMxSAsmzSzLgZkMQOdECgqZMFaYQhKWUlrEWZ4ykoNlXXTS5q5c9VmDD2pe1W7ZjFSUkURKnsi4UWetMq7y3kGhVq780G6tKFGbC6nthRp52sq5D5X7h0UtK32Arx-m3bsSkkmuxOBRPRE-YWMm1KTx59sF9EfuSvsGv_b8k_0N0bV81g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304775472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Independent Voter in 1952: A Study of Pittsfield, Massachusetts</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Cambridge Journals Digital Archive: All to end 2021 Full Collection</source><creator>Hastings, Philip K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Philip K.</creatorcontrib><description>A challenging problem for both the student of political behavior and the practical politician is the self-labeled independent voter. Much of the research on what appears to be an increasingly larger segment of the American electorate has been either historically or sociologically oriented in the sense that it has focused on trend studies of the voting pattern of this group or has attempted to describe it in terms of its objective characteristics. Frequently, by inference at least, we are led to believe that the future political behavior of the independent can be anticipated if we have information of the above nature. The central purpose of this article is to present evidence favoring the hypothesis that the political behavior of the independent is more closely related to relevant psychological variables, such as his political perceptions, than to his past voting habits or his objective attributes. During the period from April through November of 1952, the author directed a detailed study of the political opinions and behavior of the residents of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, a city of approximately 53,000 people. The research methods employed in the project included a systematic historic analysis of the community, a series of four public opinion surveys, content analysis of some of the mass media of communication, and a panel study. The first poll took place late in the spring of 1952, the second in August, and the third and fourth were carried out just prior to and immediately following the November elections. The panel members, coming from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds, were interviewed periodically throughout the course of the project.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1952907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Economic surveys ; Political elections ; Political organizations ; Political parties ; Presidential elections ; Short Papers ; Voting ; Voting behavior ; Voting patterns</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 1953-09, Vol.47 (3), p.805-810</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 1953</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8046a1135cc81e63c2e7dec89d3be3c9eeab0761e96cd6cf703811f29b830bed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1952907$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1952907$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>161,314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Philip K.</creatorcontrib><title>The Independent Voter in 1952: A Study of Pittsfield, Massachusetts</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>A challenging problem for both the student of political behavior and the practical politician is the self-labeled independent voter. Much of the research on what appears to be an increasingly larger segment of the American electorate has been either historically or sociologically oriented in the sense that it has focused on trend studies of the voting pattern of this group or has attempted to describe it in terms of its objective characteristics. Frequently, by inference at least, we are led to believe that the future political behavior of the independent can be anticipated if we have information of the above nature. The central purpose of this article is to present evidence favoring the hypothesis that the political behavior of the independent is more closely related to relevant psychological variables, such as his political perceptions, than to his past voting habits or his objective attributes. During the period from April through November of 1952, the author directed a detailed study of the political opinions and behavior of the residents of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, a city of approximately 53,000 people. The research methods employed in the project included a systematic historic analysis of the community, a series of four public opinion surveys, content analysis of some of the mass media of communication, and a panel study. The first poll took place late in the spring of 1952, the second in August, and the third and fourth were carried out just prior to and immediately following the November elections. The panel members, coming from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds, were interviewed periodically throughout the course of the project.</description><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political organizations</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Short Papers</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting behavior</subject><subject>Voting patterns</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1953</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p_gsBBRGsJk2TtL6NoXOwzV_T15AmV9c515mk4P57OzpEfPAlR44P3zsOoWNKLmNG5BXNeJwRuYM6lDMZ8Sxhu6hDCGER4TzZRwfez5svoSTtoP50Bni4tLCC5lkG_FoFcLhc4k3ONe7h51DbNa4K_FCG4IsSFvYCj7X32sxqD03vEO0VeuHhaFu76OX2Ztq_i0b3g2G_N4oM40mIUpIITSnjxqQUBDMxSAsmzSzLgZkMQOdECgqZMFaYQhKWUlrEWZ4ykoNlXXTS5q5c9VmDD2pe1W7ZjFSUkURKnsi4UWetMq7y3kGhVq780G6tKFGbC6nthRp52sq5D5X7h0UtK32Arx-m3bsSkkmuxOBRPRE-YWMm1KTx59sF9EfuSvsGv_b8k_0N0bV81g</recordid><startdate>19530901</startdate><enddate>19530901</enddate><creator>Hastings, Philip K.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>The American Political Science Association</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19530901</creationdate><title>The Independent Voter in 1952: A Study of Pittsfield, Massachusetts</title><author>Hastings, Philip K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8046a1135cc81e63c2e7dec89d3be3c9eeab0761e96cd6cf703811f29b830bed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1953</creationdate><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political organizations</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Short Papers</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting behavior</topic><topic>Voting patterns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Philip K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hastings, Philip K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Independent Voter in 1952: A Study of Pittsfield, Massachusetts</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>1953-09-01</date><risdate>1953</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>805</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>805-810</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>A challenging problem for both the student of political behavior and the practical politician is the self-labeled independent voter. Much of the research on what appears to be an increasingly larger segment of the American electorate has been either historically or sociologically oriented in the sense that it has focused on trend studies of the voting pattern of this group or has attempted to describe it in terms of its objective characteristics. Frequently, by inference at least, we are led to believe that the future political behavior of the independent can be anticipated if we have information of the above nature. The central purpose of this article is to present evidence favoring the hypothesis that the political behavior of the independent is more closely related to relevant psychological variables, such as his political perceptions, than to his past voting habits or his objective attributes. During the period from April through November of 1952, the author directed a detailed study of the political opinions and behavior of the residents of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, a city of approximately 53,000 people. The research methods employed in the project included a systematic historic analysis of the community, a series of four public opinion surveys, content analysis of some of the mass media of communication, and a panel study. The first poll took place late in the spring of 1952, the second in August, and the third and fourth were carried out just prior to and immediately following the November elections. The panel members, coming from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds, were interviewed periodically throughout the course of the project.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1952907</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 1953-09, Vol.47 (3), p.805-810
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1304775472
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Cambridge Journals Digital Archive: All to end 2021 Full Collection
subjects Economic surveys
Political elections
Political organizations
Political parties
Presidential elections
Short Papers
Voting
Voting behavior
Voting patterns
title The Independent Voter in 1952: A Study of Pittsfield, Massachusetts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Independent%20Voter%20in%201952:%20A%20Study%20of%20Pittsfield,%20Massachusetts&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Hastings,%20Philip%20K.&rft.date=1953-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=805&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=805-810&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1952907&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1952907%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8046a1135cc81e63c2e7dec89d3be3c9eeab0761e96cd6cf703811f29b830bed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304775472&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_1952907&rft_jstor_id=1952907&rfr_iscdi=true