Conscience and Conscientious Action

At the present time Tribunals, appointed under an Act of Parliament, are engaged all over England in dealing with claims to exemption from military service based on the ground of “conscientious objection” to taking part directly or indirectly in warlike activities. Now it is no part of the professio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy (London) 1940-04, Vol.15 (58), p.115-130
Main Author: Broad, C. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognition
Cognitive psychology
Emotion
Military service
Morality
Motivation
Promises
Skepticism
Teleology
Utilitarianism
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-fba12e074447b6186e121a7bd9a758542aeac9baac9cbc95f011bd9812418b123
cites
container_end_page 130
container_issue 58
container_start_page 115
container_title Philosophy (London)
container_volume 15
creator Broad, C. D.
description At the present time Tribunals, appointed under an Act of Parliament, are engaged all over England in dealing with claims to exemption from military service based on the ground of “conscientious objection” to taking part directly or indirectly in warlike activities. Now it is no part of the professional business of moral philosophers to tell people what they ought or ought not to do or to exhort them to do their duty. Moral philosophers, as such, have no special information, not available to the general public, about what is right and what is wrong; nor have they any call to undertake those hortatory functions which are so adequately performed by clergymen, politicians, leader-writers, and wireless loudspeakers. But it is the function of a moral philosopher to reflect on the moral concepts and beliefs which he or others have; to try to analyse them and draw distinctions and clear up confusions in connection with them; and to see how they are inter-related and whether they can be arranged in a coherent system. Now there can be no doubt that the popular notions of “conscience” and “conscientious action” are extremely vague and confused. So I think that, by devoting this paper to an attempt to elucidate them, I may succeed in being topical without being impertinent.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0031819100035907
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1310413638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0031819100035907</cupid><jstor_id>3746830</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3746830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-fba12e074447b6186e121a7bd9a758542aeac9baac9cbc95f011bd9812418b123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoWKc_QPBisOtqTpPm43IUtykDEb92F5I0lU7XzqQD_fdmdA5BvDnnhOd9T14OQueALwEDv3rAmIAACTgOucT8ACVAmUwF8MUhSrY43fJjdBLCMqoYcJ6gUdE2wdausW6om3L48-zqdhOGYxt7c4qOKv0e3NmuD9DT5PqxmKXzu-lNMZ6nNpPQpZXRkDnMKaXcMBDMQQaam1JqnoucZtppK42OxRor8woDRCggoyAMZGSARv3etW8_Ni50atlufBO_VEAAUyCMiKiCXmV9G4J3lVr7eqX9lwKstrdQf24RPRe9Zxm61u8NhFMmCI447XEdOve5x9q_KcYJzxWb3is2eZmT2-dCLaKe7CLolfF1-ep-Jf03xDdfEHbm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1310413638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conscience and Conscientious Action</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)</source><creator>Broad, C. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Broad, C. D.</creatorcontrib><description>At the present time Tribunals, appointed under an Act of Parliament, are engaged all over England in dealing with claims to exemption from military service based on the ground of “conscientious objection” to taking part directly or indirectly in warlike activities. Now it is no part of the professional business of moral philosophers to tell people what they ought or ought not to do or to exhort them to do their duty. Moral philosophers, as such, have no special information, not available to the general public, about what is right and what is wrong; nor have they any call to undertake those hortatory functions which are so adequately performed by clergymen, politicians, leader-writers, and wireless loudspeakers. But it is the function of a moral philosopher to reflect on the moral concepts and beliefs which he or others have; to try to analyse them and draw distinctions and clear up confusions in connection with them; and to see how they are inter-related and whether they can be arranged in a coherent system. Now there can be no doubt that the popular notions of “conscience” and “conscientious action” are extremely vague and confused. So I think that, by devoting this paper to an attempt to elucidate them, I may succeed in being topical without being impertinent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-817X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0031819100035907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Cognitive psychology ; Emotion ; Military service ; Morality ; Motivation ; Promises ; Skepticism ; Teleology ; Utilitarianism</subject><ispartof>Philosophy (London), 1940-04, Vol.15 (58), p.115-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1940</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-fba12e074447b6186e121a7bd9a758542aeac9baac9cbc95f011bd9812418b123</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3746830$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031819100035907/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,55689,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broad, C. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Conscience and Conscientious Action</title><title>Philosophy (London)</title><addtitle>Philosophy</addtitle><description>At the present time Tribunals, appointed under an Act of Parliament, are engaged all over England in dealing with claims to exemption from military service based on the ground of “conscientious objection” to taking part directly or indirectly in warlike activities. Now it is no part of the professional business of moral philosophers to tell people what they ought or ought not to do or to exhort them to do their duty. Moral philosophers, as such, have no special information, not available to the general public, about what is right and what is wrong; nor have they any call to undertake those hortatory functions which are so adequately performed by clergymen, politicians, leader-writers, and wireless loudspeakers. But it is the function of a moral philosopher to reflect on the moral concepts and beliefs which he or others have; to try to analyse them and draw distinctions and clear up confusions in connection with them; and to see how they are inter-related and whether they can be arranged in a coherent system. Now there can be no doubt that the popular notions of “conscience” and “conscientious action” are extremely vague and confused. So I think that, by devoting this paper to an attempt to elucidate them, I may succeed in being topical without being impertinent.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Emotion</subject><subject>Military service</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Promises</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><subject>Teleology</subject><subject>Utilitarianism</subject><issn>0031-8191</issn><issn>1469-817X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1940</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoWKc_QPBisOtqTpPm43IUtykDEb92F5I0lU7XzqQD_fdmdA5BvDnnhOd9T14OQueALwEDv3rAmIAACTgOucT8ACVAmUwF8MUhSrY43fJjdBLCMqoYcJ6gUdE2wdausW6om3L48-zqdhOGYxt7c4qOKv0e3NmuD9DT5PqxmKXzu-lNMZ6nNpPQpZXRkDnMKaXcMBDMQQaam1JqnoucZtppK42OxRor8woDRCggoyAMZGSARv3etW8_Ni50atlufBO_VEAAUyCMiKiCXmV9G4J3lVr7eqX9lwKstrdQf24RPRe9Zxm61u8NhFMmCI447XEdOve5x9q_KcYJzxWb3is2eZmT2-dCLaKe7CLolfF1-ep-Jf03xDdfEHbm</recordid><startdate>19400401</startdate><enddate>19400401</enddate><creator>Broad, C. D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Macmillan &amp; Co., Ltd</general><general>MacMillan</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HAWNG</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19400401</creationdate><title>Conscience and Conscientious Action</title><author>Broad, C. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-fba12e074447b6186e121a7bd9a758542aeac9baac9cbc95f011bd9812418b123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1940</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Emotion</topic><topic>Military service</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Promises</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><topic>Teleology</topic><topic>Utilitarianism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broad, C. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 13</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Philosophy (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broad, C. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conscience and Conscientious Action</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophy</addtitle><date>1940-04-01</date><risdate>1940</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>58</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>115-130</pages><issn>0031-8191</issn><eissn>1469-817X</eissn><abstract>At the present time Tribunals, appointed under an Act of Parliament, are engaged all over England in dealing with claims to exemption from military service based on the ground of “conscientious objection” to taking part directly or indirectly in warlike activities. Now it is no part of the professional business of moral philosophers to tell people what they ought or ought not to do or to exhort them to do their duty. Moral philosophers, as such, have no special information, not available to the general public, about what is right and what is wrong; nor have they any call to undertake those hortatory functions which are so adequately performed by clergymen, politicians, leader-writers, and wireless loudspeakers. But it is the function of a moral philosopher to reflect on the moral concepts and beliefs which he or others have; to try to analyse them and draw distinctions and clear up confusions in connection with them; and to see how they are inter-related and whether they can be arranged in a coherent system. Now there can be no doubt that the popular notions of “conscience” and “conscientious action” are extremely vague and confused. So I think that, by devoting this paper to an attempt to elucidate them, I may succeed in being topical without being impertinent.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0031819100035907</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8191
ispartof Philosophy (London), 1940-04, Vol.15 (58), p.115-130
issn 0031-8191
1469-817X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1310413638
source JSTOR Archival Journals; Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)
subjects Cognition
Cognitive psychology
Emotion
Military service
Morality
Motivation
Promises
Skepticism
Teleology
Utilitarianism
title Conscience and Conscientious Action
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A20%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conscience%20and%20Conscientious%20Action&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20(London)&rft.au=Broad,%20C.%20D.&rft.date=1940-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=58&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=115-130&rft.issn=0031-8191&rft.eissn=1469-817X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0031819100035907&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3746830%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-fba12e074447b6186e121a7bd9a758542aeac9baac9cbc95f011bd9812418b123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1310413638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0031819100035907&rft_jstor_id=3746830&rfr_iscdi=true