Loading…

Effects of rolling and alkali treatment of barley grain supplements on forage intake and utilization by steers and lactating cows

In Expt 1, lactating dairy cows grazing kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) were given no supplement (C), supplements of rolled barley grain at 4 (4R) and 6 (6R) kg/day and supplements of NaOH-treated whole barley grain at 4 (4A) and 6 (6A) kg/day. Daily production of milk (kg/day), fat and prote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of agricultural science 1980-12, Vol.95 (3), p.555-562
Main Authors: Sriskandarajah, N., Ashwood, A., Kellaway, R. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43
container_end_page 562
container_issue 3
container_start_page 555
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 95
creator Sriskandarajah, N.
Ashwood, A.
Kellaway, R. C.
description In Expt 1, lactating dairy cows grazing kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) were given no supplement (C), supplements of rolled barley grain at 4 (4R) and 6 (6R) kg/day and supplements of NaOH-treated whole barley grain at 4 (4A) and 6 (6A) kg/day. Daily production of milk (kg/day), fat and protein (g/day) and live-weight changes (g/day) respectively were C 7·82, 303, 276, 450; 4R 9·26, 338, 315, 865; 4A 10·23, 366, 349, 529; 6R 10·09, 352, 343, 672; 6A 10·61, 363, 348, 361. Milk production was significantly higher (P < 0·05) and live-weight gain significantly lower (P < 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. In Expt 2, yearling steers in pens were fed pasture hay ad libitum with no supplement (C) and 3 kg/day of barley grain which was either rolled (3R) or NaOH-treated whole grain (3A). Mean intakes of hay (g/day) and DOMD in vivo (%) respectively were C 7684, 60; 3R 5224, 65; 3A 6209, 60. Hay intake was significantly higher (P < 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. Fractional disappearance rates of rolled and NaOH-treated grain from nylon bags suspended in the rumen were, respectively, 0·15 and 0–07/h for the period 0–4 h, and 0·07 and 0·02/h for the period 4–12 h incubation. In Expt 2, rumen pH was higher and the digestion rate of hay in nylon bags in vivo was higher on C than on 3R and 3A. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in the rumen did not differ significantly between diets. It was concluded that greater milk production and hay intakes when cattle were fed NaOH-treated whole barley than when they were fed rolled barley were attributable to the slower rate of digestion of the former. The NaOH treatment (30 g NaOH/kg grain) was probably too low and further study is necessary to determine optimum levels of treatment, which are likely to vary with the ratio of grain: forage in the diet.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859600087967
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1311285329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859600087967</cupid><sourcerecordid>1311285329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQhS1UJFLgB3Cz1PO29nrXjo8tglAJqUoJFy7W2JmNTJzd1HYE6a3_vF6CKqSKy1ia77154yHkgrPPnHH15Y6xmk9bLRljU6WlOiIT3khdtaV-IJMRVyM_IR9TeiwqxfR0Qv5cdR26nOjQ0TiE4PsVhX5JIawheJojQt5gn0duIQbc01UE39O0224Djqh4e9oNEVZIfZ9hjS8TdtkH_xuyL9TuacqIMb2QAC6Xfklyw1M6I8cdhITnr-8pub--WlzeVLc_Zt8vv95WTrRtrnTNGVqhbQNMLoVQDppGWGROSXQOnGO6Y1rZ1lnFaiZVzZW0wkrU2i4bcUo-HeZu4_Brhymbx2EX-xJpuOC8nrai1kXFDyoXh5QidmYb_Qbi3nBmxkub_y5dPNXB48snn_8ZIK5Noao1cjY3Wi_mD99-KiOLXrxmwMZGv1zhm1XeTfkLPgyRCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311285329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of rolling and alkali treatment of barley grain supplements on forage intake and utilization by steers and lactating cows</title><source>Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)</source><creator>Sriskandarajah, N. ; Ashwood, A. ; Kellaway, R. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sriskandarajah, N. ; Ashwood, A. ; Kellaway, R. C.</creatorcontrib><description>In Expt 1, lactating dairy cows grazing kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) were given no supplement (C), supplements of rolled barley grain at 4 (4R) and 6 (6R) kg/day and supplements of NaOH-treated whole barley grain at 4 (4A) and 6 (6A) kg/day. Daily production of milk (kg/day), fat and protein (g/day) and live-weight changes (g/day) respectively were C 7·82, 303, 276, 450; 4R 9·26, 338, 315, 865; 4A 10·23, 366, 349, 529; 6R 10·09, 352, 343, 672; 6A 10·61, 363, 348, 361. Milk production was significantly higher (P &lt; 0·05) and live-weight gain significantly lower (P &lt; 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. In Expt 2, yearling steers in pens were fed pasture hay ad libitum with no supplement (C) and 3 kg/day of barley grain which was either rolled (3R) or NaOH-treated whole grain (3A). Mean intakes of hay (g/day) and DOMD in vivo (%) respectively were C 7684, 60; 3R 5224, 65; 3A 6209, 60. Hay intake was significantly higher (P &lt; 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. Fractional disappearance rates of rolled and NaOH-treated grain from nylon bags suspended in the rumen were, respectively, 0·15 and 0–07/h for the period 0–4 h, and 0·07 and 0·02/h for the period 4–12 h incubation. In Expt 2, rumen pH was higher and the digestion rate of hay in nylon bags in vivo was higher on C than on 3R and 3A. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in the rumen did not differ significantly between diets. It was concluded that greater milk production and hay intakes when cattle were fed NaOH-treated whole barley than when they were fed rolled barley were attributable to the slower rate of digestion of the former. The NaOH treatment (30 g NaOH/kg grain) was probably too low and further study is necessary to determine optimum levels of treatment, which are likely to vary with the ratio of grain: forage in the diet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600087967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 1980-12, Vol.95 (3), p.555-562</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859600087967/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,55689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sriskandarajah, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashwood, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellaway, R. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of rolling and alkali treatment of barley grain supplements on forage intake and utilization by steers and lactating cows</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>In Expt 1, lactating dairy cows grazing kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) were given no supplement (C), supplements of rolled barley grain at 4 (4R) and 6 (6R) kg/day and supplements of NaOH-treated whole barley grain at 4 (4A) and 6 (6A) kg/day. Daily production of milk (kg/day), fat and protein (g/day) and live-weight changes (g/day) respectively were C 7·82, 303, 276, 450; 4R 9·26, 338, 315, 865; 4A 10·23, 366, 349, 529; 6R 10·09, 352, 343, 672; 6A 10·61, 363, 348, 361. Milk production was significantly higher (P &lt; 0·05) and live-weight gain significantly lower (P &lt; 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. In Expt 2, yearling steers in pens were fed pasture hay ad libitum with no supplement (C) and 3 kg/day of barley grain which was either rolled (3R) or NaOH-treated whole grain (3A). Mean intakes of hay (g/day) and DOMD in vivo (%) respectively were C 7684, 60; 3R 5224, 65; 3A 6209, 60. Hay intake was significantly higher (P &lt; 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. Fractional disappearance rates of rolled and NaOH-treated grain from nylon bags suspended in the rumen were, respectively, 0·15 and 0–07/h for the period 0–4 h, and 0·07 and 0·02/h for the period 4–12 h incubation. In Expt 2, rumen pH was higher and the digestion rate of hay in nylon bags in vivo was higher on C than on 3R and 3A. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in the rumen did not differ significantly between diets. It was concluded that greater milk production and hay intakes when cattle were fed NaOH-treated whole barley than when they were fed rolled barley were attributable to the slower rate of digestion of the former. The NaOH treatment (30 g NaOH/kg grain) was probably too low and further study is necessary to determine optimum levels of treatment, which are likely to vary with the ratio of grain: forage in the diet.</description><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQhS1UJFLgB3Cz1PO29nrXjo8tglAJqUoJFy7W2JmNTJzd1HYE6a3_vF6CKqSKy1ia77154yHkgrPPnHH15Y6xmk9bLRljU6WlOiIT3khdtaV-IJMRVyM_IR9TeiwqxfR0Qv5cdR26nOjQ0TiE4PsVhX5JIawheJojQt5gn0duIQbc01UE39O0224Djqh4e9oNEVZIfZ9hjS8TdtkH_xuyL9TuacqIMb2QAC6Xfklyw1M6I8cdhITnr-8pub--WlzeVLc_Zt8vv95WTrRtrnTNGVqhbQNMLoVQDppGWGROSXQOnGO6Y1rZ1lnFaiZVzZW0wkrU2i4bcUo-HeZu4_Brhymbx2EX-xJpuOC8nrai1kXFDyoXh5QidmYb_Qbi3nBmxkub_y5dPNXB48snn_8ZIK5Noao1cjY3Wi_mD99-KiOLXrxmwMZGv1zhm1XeTfkLPgyRCg</recordid><startdate>19801201</startdate><enddate>19801201</enddate><creator>Sriskandarajah, N.</creator><creator>Ashwood, A.</creator><creator>Kellaway, R. C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19801201</creationdate><title>Effects of rolling and alkali treatment of barley grain supplements on forage intake and utilization by steers and lactating cows</title><author>Sriskandarajah, N. ; Ashwood, A. ; Kellaway, R. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sriskandarajah, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashwood, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellaway, R. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sriskandarajah, N.</au><au>Ashwood, A.</au><au>Kellaway, R. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of rolling and alkali treatment of barley grain supplements on forage intake and utilization by steers and lactating cows</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>1980-12-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>555</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>555-562</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>In Expt 1, lactating dairy cows grazing kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) were given no supplement (C), supplements of rolled barley grain at 4 (4R) and 6 (6R) kg/day and supplements of NaOH-treated whole barley grain at 4 (4A) and 6 (6A) kg/day. Daily production of milk (kg/day), fat and protein (g/day) and live-weight changes (g/day) respectively were C 7·82, 303, 276, 450; 4R 9·26, 338, 315, 865; 4A 10·23, 366, 349, 529; 6R 10·09, 352, 343, 672; 6A 10·61, 363, 348, 361. Milk production was significantly higher (P &lt; 0·05) and live-weight gain significantly lower (P &lt; 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. In Expt 2, yearling steers in pens were fed pasture hay ad libitum with no supplement (C) and 3 kg/day of barley grain which was either rolled (3R) or NaOH-treated whole grain (3A). Mean intakes of hay (g/day) and DOMD in vivo (%) respectively were C 7684, 60; 3R 5224, 65; 3A 6209, 60. Hay intake was significantly higher (P &lt; 0·05) on NaOH-treated grain than on rolled grain. Fractional disappearance rates of rolled and NaOH-treated grain from nylon bags suspended in the rumen were, respectively, 0·15 and 0–07/h for the period 0–4 h, and 0·07 and 0·02/h for the period 4–12 h incubation. In Expt 2, rumen pH was higher and the digestion rate of hay in nylon bags in vivo was higher on C than on 3R and 3A. Volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in the rumen did not differ significantly between diets. It was concluded that greater milk production and hay intakes when cattle were fed NaOH-treated whole barley than when they were fed rolled barley were attributable to the slower rate of digestion of the former. The NaOH treatment (30 g NaOH/kg grain) was probably too low and further study is necessary to determine optimum levels of treatment, which are likely to vary with the ratio of grain: forage in the diet.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859600087967</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 1980-12, Vol.95 (3), p.555-562
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1311285329
source Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)
title Effects of rolling and alkali treatment of barley grain supplements on forage intake and utilization by steers and lactating cows
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A46%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20rolling%20and%20alkali%20treatment%20of%20barley%20grain%20supplements%20on%20forage%20intake%20and%20utilization%20by%20steers%20and%20lactating%20cows&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Sriskandarajah,%20N.&rft.date=1980-12-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=555&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=555-562&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859600087967&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1311285329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9210eb39b4a06d337ca443be0c76eccacc09f097b5cb7020672176b3b6e99bd43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311285329&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859600087967&rfr_iscdi=true