Loading…

Growth and distribution of individual muscles in Double Muscled and normal cattle

Eighteen Double Muscled (DM), 18 Beef Synthetic and 18 Hereford bulls, serially slaughtered from approximately 250 to 800 kg live weight, were used to examine the influence of maturity type and Double Muscling on individual muscle growth patterns and distribution. Breed types differed significantly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of agricultural science 1985-12, Vol.105 (3), p.479-490
Main Authors: Shahin, Karima A., Berg, R. T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513
container_end_page 490
container_issue 3
container_start_page 479
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 105
creator Shahin, Karima A.
Berg, R. T.
description Eighteen Double Muscled (DM), 18 Beef Synthetic and 18 Hereford bulls, serially slaughtered from approximately 250 to 800 kg live weight, were used to examine the influence of maturity type and Double Muscling on individual muscle growth patterns and distribution. Breed types differed significantly in the relative growth rate of five of the 95 muscles. Individual muscles grew and developed at relatively different rates with muscles associated with locomotion being early developing followed by those associated with structure or posture and finally those which respond to sexual maturation or luxury muscles which were late developing. Individual muscle growth patterns revealed an increasing disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an increasing caudo-cranial gradient along the whole body. However, within any anatomical region considerable variations with well defined growth gradients were found for individual muscles. In the proximal region of both limbs increasing medio-lateral growth gradients were apparent. At the same total side muscle, breed types differed significantly in adjusted mean weights of 33 of the 95 muscles. When comparison was made at the same total side muscle, DM showed a range of hypertrophy of + 28% to -28% when compared with the more normal breed types. Muscular hypertrophy followed a disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an inner–outer gradient across the muscle layers with the superficial and bulkiest muscles being the most hypertrophied. At the same total side muscle, DM had heavier expensive or luxury muscles than normal cattle.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859600059347
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1311289426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859600059347</cupid><sourcerecordid>1311289426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AE8WPFczTZo2R9l1V0ERWT2HpEk02m3WpPXPtzfrigjiJQMzv5d58xA6BHwCGKrTBcYF1CVnGOOSE1ptoRFQxvMyvdtotB7n6_ku2ovxKVEV5vUI3c6Df-sfM9npTLvYB6eG3vku8zZznXavTg-yzZZDbFoTUyub-kG1Jrv-6ugvYefDMkGN7PvW7KMdK9toDr7rGN3Pzu8mF_nVzfxycnaVN6Tifa4I4YWpK8obajWU0kopsbVMlQq4sqa2mpSa0cbUChPNCgBGlW7qCtKhQMboePPvKviXwcRePPkhdGmlAAJQ1JwWLFGwoZrgYwzGilVwSxk-BGCxTk78SS5p8o0m5WHefwQyPAtWkaoUbH4rZtPpYoqv54Im_mjDW-mFfAguivtFgYFgoCUwwhNBvl3IpQpOP5hfZv_18QldyIgy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311289426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth and distribution of individual muscles in Double Muscled and normal cattle</title><source>Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)</source><creator>Shahin, Karima A. ; Berg, R. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Karima A. ; Berg, R. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Eighteen Double Muscled (DM), 18 Beef Synthetic and 18 Hereford bulls, serially slaughtered from approximately 250 to 800 kg live weight, were used to examine the influence of maturity type and Double Muscling on individual muscle growth patterns and distribution. Breed types differed significantly in the relative growth rate of five of the 95 muscles. Individual muscles grew and developed at relatively different rates with muscles associated with locomotion being early developing followed by those associated with structure or posture and finally those which respond to sexual maturation or luxury muscles which were late developing. Individual muscle growth patterns revealed an increasing disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an increasing caudo-cranial gradient along the whole body. However, within any anatomical region considerable variations with well defined growth gradients were found for individual muscles. In the proximal region of both limbs increasing medio-lateral growth gradients were apparent. At the same total side muscle, breed types differed significantly in adjusted mean weights of 33 of the 95 muscles. When comparison was made at the same total side muscle, DM showed a range of hypertrophy of + 28% to -28% when compared with the more normal breed types. Muscular hypertrophy followed a disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an inner–outer gradient across the muscle layers with the superficial and bulkiest muscles being the most hypertrophied. At the same total side muscle, DM had heavier expensive or luxury muscles than normal cattle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600059347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>anatomy and morphology ; beef bulls ; beef synthetic ; cattle breeds ; distribution ; genetic techniques and protocols ; growth analysis ; Hereford ; muscle weight ; muscles ; statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 1985-12, Vol.105 (3), p.479-490</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859600059347/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,55689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Karima A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, R. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Growth and distribution of individual muscles in Double Muscled and normal cattle</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>Eighteen Double Muscled (DM), 18 Beef Synthetic and 18 Hereford bulls, serially slaughtered from approximately 250 to 800 kg live weight, were used to examine the influence of maturity type and Double Muscling on individual muscle growth patterns and distribution. Breed types differed significantly in the relative growth rate of five of the 95 muscles. Individual muscles grew and developed at relatively different rates with muscles associated with locomotion being early developing followed by those associated with structure or posture and finally those which respond to sexual maturation or luxury muscles which were late developing. Individual muscle growth patterns revealed an increasing disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an increasing caudo-cranial gradient along the whole body. However, within any anatomical region considerable variations with well defined growth gradients were found for individual muscles. In the proximal region of both limbs increasing medio-lateral growth gradients were apparent. At the same total side muscle, breed types differed significantly in adjusted mean weights of 33 of the 95 muscles. When comparison was made at the same total side muscle, DM showed a range of hypertrophy of + 28% to -28% when compared with the more normal breed types. Muscular hypertrophy followed a disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an inner–outer gradient across the muscle layers with the superficial and bulkiest muscles being the most hypertrophied. At the same total side muscle, DM had heavier expensive or luxury muscles than normal cattle.</description><subject>anatomy and morphology</subject><subject>beef bulls</subject><subject>beef synthetic</subject><subject>cattle breeds</subject><subject>distribution</subject><subject>genetic techniques and protocols</subject><subject>growth analysis</subject><subject>Hereford</subject><subject>muscle weight</subject><subject>muscles</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AE8WPFczTZo2R9l1V0ERWT2HpEk02m3WpPXPtzfrigjiJQMzv5d58xA6BHwCGKrTBcYF1CVnGOOSE1ptoRFQxvMyvdtotB7n6_ku2ovxKVEV5vUI3c6Df-sfM9npTLvYB6eG3vku8zZznXavTg-yzZZDbFoTUyub-kG1Jrv-6ugvYefDMkGN7PvW7KMdK9toDr7rGN3Pzu8mF_nVzfxycnaVN6Tifa4I4YWpK8obajWU0kopsbVMlQq4sqa2mpSa0cbUChPNCgBGlW7qCtKhQMboePPvKviXwcRePPkhdGmlAAJQ1JwWLFGwoZrgYwzGilVwSxk-BGCxTk78SS5p8o0m5WHefwQyPAtWkaoUbH4rZtPpYoqv54Im_mjDW-mFfAguivtFgYFgoCUwwhNBvl3IpQpOP5hfZv_18QldyIgy</recordid><startdate>19851201</startdate><enddate>19851201</enddate><creator>Shahin, Karima A.</creator><creator>Berg, R. T.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19851201</creationdate><title>Growth and distribution of individual muscles in Double Muscled and normal cattle</title><author>Shahin, Karima A. ; Berg, R. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>anatomy and morphology</topic><topic>beef bulls</topic><topic>beef synthetic</topic><topic>cattle breeds</topic><topic>distribution</topic><topic>genetic techniques and protocols</topic><topic>growth analysis</topic><topic>Hereford</topic><topic>muscle weight</topic><topic>muscles</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Karima A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, R. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shahin, Karima A.</au><au>Berg, R. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth and distribution of individual muscles in Double Muscled and normal cattle</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>1985-12-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>479-490</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>Eighteen Double Muscled (DM), 18 Beef Synthetic and 18 Hereford bulls, serially slaughtered from approximately 250 to 800 kg live weight, were used to examine the influence of maturity type and Double Muscling on individual muscle growth patterns and distribution. Breed types differed significantly in the relative growth rate of five of the 95 muscles. Individual muscles grew and developed at relatively different rates with muscles associated with locomotion being early developing followed by those associated with structure or posture and finally those which respond to sexual maturation or luxury muscles which were late developing. Individual muscle growth patterns revealed an increasing disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an increasing caudo-cranial gradient along the whole body. However, within any anatomical region considerable variations with well defined growth gradients were found for individual muscles. In the proximal region of both limbs increasing medio-lateral growth gradients were apparent. At the same total side muscle, breed types differed significantly in adjusted mean weights of 33 of the 95 muscles. When comparison was made at the same total side muscle, DM showed a range of hypertrophy of + 28% to -28% when compared with the more normal breed types. Muscular hypertrophy followed a disto-proximal gradient along the limbs and an inner–outer gradient across the muscle layers with the superficial and bulkiest muscles being the most hypertrophied. At the same total side muscle, DM had heavier expensive or luxury muscles than normal cattle.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859600059347</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 1985-12, Vol.105 (3), p.479-490
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1311289426
source Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)
subjects anatomy and morphology
beef bulls
beef synthetic
cattle breeds
distribution
genetic techniques and protocols
growth analysis
Hereford
muscle weight
muscles
statistical analysis
title Growth and distribution of individual muscles in Double Muscled and normal cattle
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth%20and%20distribution%20of%20individual%20muscles%20in%20Double%20Muscled%20and%20normal%20cattle&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Shahin,%20Karima%20A.&rft.date=1985-12-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=479-490&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859600059347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1311289426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b3392e8749c4fd15afaaa0ff6b5b19bfe8fd35d64ce8b03d621164bdc87118513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311289426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859600059347&rfr_iscdi=true