Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases

This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Exceptional children 1991-02, Vol.57 (4), p.360
Main Author: Huefner, Dixie Snow
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior Problems
Common Law
Court Litigation
Disabilities
Elementary Secondary Education
Exceptional children
Expulsion
Federal Legislation
Federal Regulation
Honig v Doe
Student Behavior
Student expulsion
Student Placement
Student suspension
Suspension
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 360
container_title Exceptional children
container_volume 57
creator Huefner, Dixie Snow
description This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities, including litigation; federal regulations; and constitutional, statutory, and common law. (JDD)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1311477773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A10344891</galeid><ericid>EJ425684</ericid><sourcerecordid>A10344891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e239t-b2e036d0b83f35203bd925fff5e5ac36c9d97e0113b7473a4ef37174616f429a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLAzEQAOAgCtbqP_CwIN5cSDJJtnsspb4oePBxXbK7kzZlm6zJLuq_N1gPCp05DDN8zMAckQlnCnIpFT0mE0qZyAXl5Sk5i3FLKVVU0gnhc-eHDYbszeJH5k2Wmux5jD26aL3LtGuz5Wc_dj_dQkeM5-TE6C7ixW-dktfb5cviPl893T0s5qscOZRDXnOkoFpaz8CA5BTqtuTSGCNR6gZUU7ZlgZQxqAtRgBZooGCFUEwZwUsNU3K139sH_z5iHKqtH4NLJysGjIkiBSR1s1dr3WFlnfFD0M0aHQbdeYfGpvGcURBiVrLE8wM8ZYs72xzy13_8BnU3bKLvxiG9I_5zl3uHwTZVH-xOh69q-Si4VDMB3xtBdLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311477773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Huefner, Dixie Snow</creator><creatorcontrib>Huefner, Dixie Snow</creatorcontrib><description>This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities, including litigation; federal regulations; and constitutional, statutory, and common law. (JDD)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-5560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington, VA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior Problems ; Common Law ; Court Litigation ; Disabilities ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Exceptional children ; Expulsion ; Federal Legislation ; Federal Regulation ; Honig v Doe ; Student Behavior ; Student expulsion ; Student Placement ; Student suspension ; Suspension</subject><ispartof>Exceptional children, 1991-02, Vol.57 (4), p.360</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1991 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ425684$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huefner, Dixie Snow</creatorcontrib><title>Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases</title><title>Exceptional children</title><description>This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities, including litigation; federal regulations; and constitutional, statutory, and common law. (JDD)</description><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Common Law</subject><subject>Court Litigation</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Exceptional children</subject><subject>Expulsion</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Federal Regulation</subject><subject>Honig v Doe</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student expulsion</subject><subject>Student Placement</subject><subject>Student suspension</subject><subject>Suspension</subject><issn>0014-4029</issn><issn>2163-5560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLAzEQAOAgCtbqP_CwIN5cSDJJtnsspb4oePBxXbK7kzZlm6zJLuq_N1gPCp05DDN8zMAckQlnCnIpFT0mE0qZyAXl5Sk5i3FLKVVU0gnhc-eHDYbszeJH5k2Wmux5jD26aL3LtGuz5Wc_dj_dQkeM5-TE6C7ixW-dktfb5cviPl893T0s5qscOZRDXnOkoFpaz8CA5BTqtuTSGCNR6gZUU7ZlgZQxqAtRgBZooGCFUEwZwUsNU3K139sH_z5iHKqtH4NLJysGjIkiBSR1s1dr3WFlnfFD0M0aHQbdeYfGpvGcURBiVrLE8wM8ZYs72xzy13_8BnU3bKLvxiG9I_5zl3uHwTZVH-xOh69q-Si4VDMB3xtBdLw</recordid><startdate>19910201</startdate><enddate>19910201</enddate><creator>Huefner, Dixie Snow</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Council for Exceptional Children</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>JTYFY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910201</creationdate><title>Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases</title><author>Huefner, Dixie Snow</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e239t-b2e036d0b83f35203bd925fff5e5ac36c9d97e0113b7473a4ef37174616f429a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Common Law</topic><topic>Court Litigation</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Exceptional children</topic><topic>Expulsion</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Federal Regulation</topic><topic>Honig v Doe</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student expulsion</topic><topic>Student Placement</topic><topic>Student suspension</topic><topic>Suspension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huefner, Dixie Snow</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 37</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Exceptional children</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huefner, Dixie Snow</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ425684</ericid><atitle>Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases</atitle><jtitle>Exceptional children</jtitle><date>1991-02-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>360</spage><pages>360-</pages><issn>0014-4029</issn><eissn>2163-5560</eissn><abstract>This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities, including litigation; federal regulations; and constitutional, statutory, and common law. (JDD)</abstract><cop>Arlington, VA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4029
ispartof Exceptional children, 1991-02, Vol.57 (4), p.360
issn 0014-4029
2163-5560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1311477773
source Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Behavior Problems
Common Law
Court Litigation
Disabilities
Elementary Secondary Education
Exceptional children
Expulsion
Federal Legislation
Federal Regulation
Honig v Doe
Student Behavior
Student expulsion
Student Placement
Student suspension
Suspension
title Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Another%20View%20of%20the%20Suspension%20and%20Expulsion%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Exceptional%20children&rft.au=Huefner,%20Dixie%20Snow&rft.date=1991-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=360&rft.pages=360-&rft.issn=0014-4029&rft.eissn=2163-5560&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA10344891%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e239t-b2e036d0b83f35203bd925fff5e5ac36c9d97e0113b7473a4ef37174616f429a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311477773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A10344891&rft_ericid=EJ425684&rfr_iscdi=true